pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation method
PATCH 1/6 pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation method
PATCH 1/6 pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation method
Quoted 5 lines · Haojian Zhuang
From
9064b2c877cad560fda7577564b3369c0025b7dfMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lei Wen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:24:06 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/06]pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation method
Quoted 8 lines
For the original method change from plus 1 to minus 1, this way make the default timing like tCS become 0 after calculation, although we set the timing as
0xa...Change the method to no plus and minus, and make the result closer to what the timing specified in the NAND chip spec.
Signed-off-by Lei Wen <[email protected]>
I have an identical patch queued for -stable and 2.6.36 already, from Axel Lin (but with a slightly better changelog).
I'll add your signed-off-by to that and send it on today.
The other five I'll apply to the mtd-2.6.git on top, once I have Eric's ack.
Thanks.
By the way, please could you use my dwmw2 at infradead.org address instead of @intel.com -- the latter has taken to corrupting incoming mail again, and they're being extremely slow to fix it.
Signature · 2 lines
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation
PATCH 1/6 pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation method
Quoted 13 lines · David Woodhouse
Quoted 12 lines · Haojian Zhuang
From
9064b2c877cad560fda7577564b3369c0025b7dfMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lei Wen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:24:06 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/06]pxa3xx_nand: update ns2cycle calculation methodFor the original method change from plus 1 to minus 1, this way make the default timing like tCS become 0 after calculation, although we set the timing as
0xa...Change the method to no plus and minus, and make the result closer to what the timing specified in the NAND chip spec.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Lei Wen <[email protected]>I have an identical patch queued for -stable and 2.6.36 already, from Axel Lin (but with a slightly better changelog).
I'll add your signed-off-by to that and send it on today.
Sure. No problem. And I'll send this patch set again according to Eric's comments. So please ignore the first patch in your review.