Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Misc patches

PATCH In review Khem Raj 2 participants 12 messages May 7, 2011 – May 9, 2011

lore
Share & tools
lore

Khem Raj

author
#0 lore raw

cover Misc patches

This patchset addresses few issues remaining for uclibc support and fixes some recipes which need patches to get compiling on uclibc systems.

Replacing gconf-dbus with gconf is needed for ansgstrom to build SDK images since in angstrom gconf-dbus is provided by gconf

we docuement the variable definions inside layer.conf

send-pull-request is fixed to CC only concerned folks per patch bases and not collect all addresses and CC them on all assorted patches

Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: kraj/misc-fixes
Browse: http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/misc-fixes

Thanks,
Khem Raj <[email protected]>
---

Khem Raj (8):
recipes: Replace gconf-dbus with gconf
gcc-4.6.0: Apply linaro patches
gettext.bbclass, bitbake.conf: Append nls options to EXTRA_OECONF

    instead of +=

conf/layer.conf: Use .= to append to BBPATH and =+ for BBFILES libgalago_0.5.2.bb: Fix compile for uclibc liburcu_0.5.4.bb: Let it build on uclibc targets lttng-ust_0.12.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc scripts/send-pull-request: Add CC selectively

 .../recipes-gnome/gnome/libgnomekbd_2.26.0.bb      |    2 +-
 meta/classes/gettext.bbclass                       |    6 +-
 meta/conf/bitbake.conf                             |    2 +-
 meta/conf/layer.conf                               |   13 +-
 .../recipes-connectivity/galago/libgalago_0.5.2.bb |    4 +
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc            |    4 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch  |   51 ++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch  |   63 ++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch  |   32 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch  |   28 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch  |  653 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch  |  126 ++++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch  |  177 ++++++
 .../gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc        |    9 +
 meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-desktop.inc         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-gnome/gthumb/gthumb_2.12.2.bb         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-sdk-gmae.inc         |    2 +-
 .../lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch      |   50 ++
 meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust_0.12.bb        |    4 +-
 meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.6.bb    |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.5.4.bb      |    2 +-
 scripts/send-pull-request                          |   51 +-
 22 files changed, 1249 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/8 recipes: Replace gconf-dbus with gconf

Some distributions e.g. angstrom do not support gconf-dbus anymore since its now provided by gconf and in oe-core we have PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gconf tunable, here we replace all dependencies on gconf-dbus with gconf, which should work in both cases where poky defines PREFERRED_PROVIDER-gconf = "gconf-dbus" and for angstrom it is simply gconf

Without this meta-toolchain-sdk ends up with conflicts in runqueue and does not build

---
 .../recipes-gnome/gnome/libgnomekbd_2.26.0.bb      |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-desktop.inc         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-gnome/gthumb/gthumb_2.12.2.bb         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-sdk-gmae.inc         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.6.bb    |    2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
meta-demoapps/recipes-gnome/gnome/libgnomekbd_2.26.0.bb +1 -1
index f2e4ec5..68e4eee 100644
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 DESCRIPTION = "GNOME keyboard library"
 LICENSE = "LGPL"
 
-DEPENDS = "gconf-dbus dbus libxklavier gtk+"
+DEPENDS = "gconf dbus libxklavier gtk+"
 
 inherit gnome
 
meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-desktop.inc +1 -1
index 123f82d..336b87f 100644
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 DESCRIPTION = "GNOME library for reading .desktop files"
 SECTION = "x11/gnome"
 LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2"
-DEPENDS = "gconf-dbus libxrandr virtual/libx11 gtk+ glib-2.0 gnome-doc-utils"
+DEPENDS = "gconf libxrandr virtual/libx11 gtk+ glib-2.0 gnome-doc-utils"
 
 EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-scrollkeeper --disable-desktop-docs"
 
meta/recipes-gnome/gthumb/gthumb_2.12.2.bb +1 -1
index 0b3bd1a..258f2d5 100644
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "gThumb is an image viewer and browser for the GNOME Desktop"
 SECTION = "x11/gnome"
 LICENSE = "GPLv2"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552"
-DEPENDS = "glib-2.0 gtk+ libxml2 gnome-doc-utils libunique gconf-dbus libpng gstreamer jpeg tiff gst-plugins-base"
+DEPENDS = "glib-2.0 gtk+ libxml2 gnome-doc-utils libunique gconf libpng gstreamer jpeg tiff gst-plugins-base"
 PR = "r0"
 
 EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-gnome-keyring --disable-libsoup --disable-exiv2 --disable-clutter"
meta/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-sdk-gmae.inc +1 -1
index 586d76f..b24fc9e 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ SDK-GMAE = " \
     gtk+-dev \
     gstreamer-dev \
     bluez4-dev \
-    gconf-dbus-dev \
+    gconf-dev \
     avahi-dev \
     telepathy-glib-dev \
     eds-dbus-dev \
meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.6.bb +1 -1
index 255cd5b..2e18065 100644
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \
                     file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0"
 
 
-DEPENDS = "virtual/libx11 xmu gconf-dbus"
+DEPENDS = "virtual/libx11 xmu gconf"
 
 SRC_URI = "http://libproxy.googlecode.com/files/libproxy-${PV}.tar.gz"
 
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/8 gcc-4.6.0: Apply linaro patches

In reply to Khem Raj

We take the improvements done by linaro for gcc 4.6

---
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc            |    4 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch  |   51 ++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch  |   63 ++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch  |   32 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch  |   28 +
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch  |  653 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch  |  126 ++++
 .../gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch  |  177 ++++++
 .../gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc        |    9 +
 9 files changed, 1143 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc +4 -0
index 2c30d43..609b1df 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ require gcc-common.inc
 
 require gcc-4_6-branch-backports.inc
 
+# Linaro patches for 4.6 branch
+require gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
+
 PR = "r1"
 
 DEPENDS =+ "mpfr gmp libmpc"
@@ -22,6 +25,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552 \
 
 SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
 	   ${GCC-4_6-BRANCH-BACKPORTS} \
+	   ${GCC-4_6-BRANCH-LINARO-BACKPORTS} \
 	   file://gcc-4.3.1-ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET.patch \
 	   file://100-uclibc-conf.patch \
            file://gcc-uclibc-locale-ctype_touplow_t.patch \
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch new file +51 -0

51 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch new file +63 -0

63 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch new file +32 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..465d09c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+2011-03-22  Andrew Stubbs  <[email protected]>
+
+	Backport from FSF:
+
+	2011-03-21  Daniel Jacobowitz  <[email protected]>
+
+	gcc/
+	* config/arm/unwind-arm.c (__gnu_unwind_pr_common): Correct test
+	for barrier handlers.
+
+=== modified file 'gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c'
+--- old/gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c	2009-10-30 14:55:10 +0000
++++ new/gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c	2011-03-22 10:59:10 +0000
+@@ -1196,8 +1196,6 @@
+ 		  ucbp->barrier_cache.bitpattern[4] = (_uw) &data[1];
+ 
+ 		  if (data[0] & uint32_highbit)
+-		    phase2_call_unexpected_after_unwind = 1;
+-		  else
+ 		    {
+ 		      data += rtti_count + 1;
+ 		      /* Setup for entry to the handler.  */
+@@ -1207,6 +1205,8 @@
+ 		      _Unwind_SetGR (context, 0, (_uw) ucbp);
+ 		      return _URC_INSTALL_CONTEXT;
+ 		    }
++		  else
++		    phase2_call_unexpected_after_unwind = 1;
+ 		}
+ 	      if (data[0] & uint32_highbit)
+ 		data++;
+
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch new file +28 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b684aa
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+2011-03-23  Andrew Stubbs  <[email protected]>
+
+	Backport from FSF:
+
+	2011-03-23  Julian Brown  <[email protected]>
+
+	gcc/
+	* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Only use BLKmode for volatile
+	accesses which are not naturally aligned.
+
+=== modified file 'gcc/expr.c'
+--- old/gcc/expr.c	2011-03-18 09:04:31 +0000
++++ new/gcc/expr.c	2011-04-05 16:18:11 +0000
+@@ -9147,8 +9147,11 @@
+ 		&& modifier != EXPAND_CONST_ADDRESS
+ 		&& modifier != EXPAND_INITIALIZER)
+ 	    /* If the field is volatile, we always want an aligned
+-	       access.  */
+-	    || (volatilep && flag_strict_volatile_bitfields > 0)
++	       access.  Only do this if the access is not already naturally
++	       aligned, otherwise "normal" (non-bitfield) volatile fields
++	       become non-addressable.  */
++	    || (volatilep && flag_strict_volatile_bitfields > 0
++		&& (bitpos % GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode) != 0))
+ 	    /* If the field isn't aligned enough to fetch as a memref,
+ 	       fetch it as a bit field.  */
+ 	    || (mode1 != BLKmode
+
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch new file +653 -0

653 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch new file +126 -0

126 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch new file +177 -0

177 lines not on this page · raw message

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc new file +9 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3160e35
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+GCC-4_6-BRANCH-LINARO-BACKPORTS = " \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106723.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106729.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106731.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106733.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106737.patch \
+file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106738.patch \
+"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#3 lore raw

PATCH 3/8 gettext.bbclass, bitbake.conf: Append nls options to EXTRA_OECONF instead of +=

In reply to Khem Raj

Some recipes do not defined EXTRA_OECONF in such cases += drops the --enable|--disable-nls options. In another case where recipe defines EXTRA_OECONF instead of adding/appending to it then --enable|--disable-nls options are lost from EXTRA_OECONF

We define EXTRA_OECONF = "" in bitbake.conf so the variable exists always.

We use _append instead of += so the option is added at very end and not lost.

We only return empty gettext dependencies if its a target recipe
in case when USE_NLS is not set because the native/cross/nativesdk recipes still need the gettext dependencies

---
 meta/classes/gettext.bbclass |    6 +++---
 meta/conf/bitbake.conf       |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
meta/classes/gettext.bbclass +3 -3
index 6f79e5e..86b505b 100644
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 def gettext_dependencies(d):
-    if d.getVar('USE_NLS', True) == 'no':
+    if d.getVar('USE_NLS', True) == 'no' and not oe.utils.inherits(d, 'native', 'nativesdk', 'cross'):
         return ""
-    if bb.data.getVar('INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS', d, True) and not oe.utils.inherits(d, 'cross-canadian'):
+    if d.getVar('INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS', True) and not oe.utils.inherits(d, 'cross-canadian'):
         return ""
     return d.getVar('DEPENDS_GETTEXT', False)
 
@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ def gettext_oeconf(d):
 DEPENDS_GETTEXT = "virtual/gettext gettext-native"
 
 BASEDEPENDS =+ "${@gettext_dependencies(d)}"
-EXTRA_OECONF += "${@gettext_oeconf(d)}"
+EXTRA_OECONF_append = " ${@gettext_oeconf(d)}"
meta/conf/bitbake.conf +1 -1
index a2b36bd..4a1bfa1 100644
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ export BUILD_NM = "${BUILD_PREFIX}nm"
 
 export MAKE = "make"
 EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS="
-
+EXTRA_OECONF = ""
 export LC_ALL = "C"
 
 ##################################################################
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#4 lore raw

PATCH 4/8 conf/layer.conf: Use .= to append to BBPATH and =+ for BBFILES

In reply to Khem Raj

Appending to BBPATH gives a definite order to BBLAYERS which means paths are preferred in order from left to right.

---
 meta/conf/layer.conf |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
meta/conf/layer.conf +10 -3
index 5287417..10a6948 100644
@@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
 BBPATH ?= ""
 # We have a conf and classes directory, add to BBPATH
-BBPATH := "${BBPATH}:${LAYERDIR}"
-
+BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}"
 # We have a packages directory, add to BBFILES
-BBFILES := "${BBFILES} ${LAYERDIR}/packages/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb"
+# packages is still there because metadata_scm.bbclass still uses
+# it to deduce the repo directory and thats the reason to prepend
+# to BBFILES here because this class uses the first entry in
+# BBFILES to calculate the scm base.
+# since the order of BBFLILES is not that important its acted upon
+# using BBFILES_PRIORITY we are ok to keep the oe-core BBFILES dir
+# at top
+
+BBFILES =+ "${LAYERDIR}/packages/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb"
 
 BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "normal"
 BBFILE_PATTERN_normal := "^${LAYERDIR}/"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#5 lore raw

PATCH 5/8 libgalago_0.5.2.bb: Fix compile for uclibc

In reply to Khem Raj

uclibc targets may not have gettext but this package still needs config.rpath during regenerating configury so we provide it when libc is uclibc.

---
 .../recipes-connectivity/galago/libgalago_0.5.2.bb |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-connectivity/galago/libgalago_0.5.2.bb +4 -0
index 6d9f76b..3a47620 100644
@@ -18,3 +18,7 @@ PR = "r2"
 inherit autotools pkgconfig gettext
 
 EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-tests --disable-check"
+
+do_configure_prepend_libc-uclibc() {
+        touch ${S}/config.rpath
+}
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#6 lore raw

PATCH 6/8 liburcu_0.5.4.bb: Let it build on uclibc targets

In reply to Khem Raj

uclibc requires -D_GNU_SOURCE to be defined for it to enable GNU extensions which CPU_SET/CPU_ZERO are used by this package. So we add -D_GNU_SOURCE to CFLAGS when compiling for uclibc.

---
 meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.5.4.bb |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.5.4.bb +1 -1
index 8e17e5d..b83d708 100644
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "04147d24749be75200173859839207f7"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "02aedbb16c16bd034e246d5c9637a9232be559c66fc2fe4eb28948e234bd89f1"
 
 S = "${WORKDIR}/userspace-rcu-${PV}"
-
+CFLAGS_append_libc-uclibc = " -D_GNU_SOURCE"
 inherit autotools
 
 # liburcu, which is only used by lttng-ust, may not build on other
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#7 lore raw

PATCH 7/8 lttng-ust_0.12.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

In reply to Khem Raj

We provide alternative implementation of sched_getcpu() when compiling for uclibc

---
 .../lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch      |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust_0.12.bb        |    4 +-
 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch new file +50 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7102a69
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+uClibc does not have sched_getcpu() implemented. So we create a wrapper
+to getcpu syscall when compiling for uclibc.
+
+So far execinfo.h does not exist on uclibc but it turns out to be that
+this header is not needed even in eglibc case so it can be removed
+
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
+
+Upstream-status: Pending
+
+Index: ust-0.12/libust/tracer.h
+===================================================================
+--- ust-0.12.orig/libust/tracer.h
++++ ust-0.12/libust/tracer.h
+@@ -342,14 +342,22 @@ static __inline__ void ltt_write_trace_h
+ 	header->start_freq = trace->start_freq;
+ 	header->freq_scale = trace->freq_scale;
+ }
+-
++#ifdef __UCLIBC__
++#define sched_getcpu(cpu, node, cache) syscall(__NR_getcpu, cpu, node, cache)
++#endif
+ #ifndef UST_VALGRIND
+ 
+ static __inline__ int ust_get_cpu(void)
+ {
+ 	int cpu;
+ 
++#ifdef __UCLIBC__
++	int c, s;
++	s = syscall(__NR_getcpu, &c, NULL, NULL);
++	cpu = (s == -1) ? s : c;
++#else
+ 	cpu = sched_getcpu();
++#endif
+ 	if (likely(cpu >= 0))
+ 		return cpu;
+ 	/*
+Index: ust-0.12/libustcomm/ustcomm.c
+===================================================================
+--- ust-0.12.orig/libustcomm/ustcomm.c
++++ ust-0.12/libustcomm/ustcomm.c
+@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <string.h>
+-#include <execinfo.h>
+ 
+ #include "ustcomm.h"
+ #include "usterr.h"
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust_0.12.bb +3 -1
index 7dadc04..5fca949 100644
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ DEPENDS = "liburcu"
 
 PR = "r0"
 
-SRC_URI = "http://lttng.org/files/ust/releases/ust-${PV}.tar.gz"
+SRC_URI = "http://lttng.org/files/ust/releases/ust-${PV}.tar.gz \
+           file://uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch \
+          "
 
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "fae6e324a56016658c5b83ec14ba0043"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "215b05f47d0c9e3a2934926a7d14fa9c67025db917c3a1f641df40b08314ab0c"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
author
#8 lore raw

PATCH 8/8 scripts/send-pull-request: Add CC selectively

In reply to Khem Raj

Currently a consolidated pull request adds all the participants to every patch, which in essence is good but might lose focus of developers who would be interested to know about the patch that developer contributed to. This patch fixes the script by extracting the to and cc information from each patch one by one and add it to patch mail header instead of doing a sweeping one pass over all patches to collect all email addresses. It should reduce some email traffic for developers.

---
 scripts/send-pull-request |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
scripts/send-pull-request +29 -22
index 3af2a9f..36a89f4 100755
@@ -29,24 +29,38 @@ EOM
 # Collect To and CC addresses from the patch files if they exist
 # $1: Which header to add the recipients to, "TO" or "CC"
 # $2: The regex to match and strip from the line with email addresses
+# $3: The patch which we are preparing to send
 harvest_recipients()
 {
     TO_CC=$1
     REGX=$2
+    PATCH=$3
     export IFS=$',\n'
-    for PATCH in $PDIR/*.patch; do
-        # Grab To addresses
-        for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
-            if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
-            elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
-            fi
-        done
+    # Grab To addresses
+    for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
+        if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
+        elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
+        fi
     done
     unset IFS
 }
 
+# $1: The given patch
+create_recipient_lists()
+{
+    THEPATCH=$1
+    # Harvest emails from the generated patch and populate the TO and CC variables
+    # In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
+    # etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
+    if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
+        harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *" $THEPATCH
+    fi
+}
+
 
 # Parse and verify arguments
 while getopts "af:ghp:t:" OPT; do
@@ -100,15 +114,6 @@ for TOKEN in SUBJECT BLURB; do
 done
 
 
-# Harvest emails from the generated patches and populate the TO and CC variables
-# In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
-# etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
-if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
-    harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *"
-fi
-
 case "$PULL_MTA" in
     git)
         FROM="$(git config sendemail.from)"
@@ -158,11 +163,12 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
     ERROR=0
     case "$PULL_MTA" in
         git)
-            export IFS=$','
-            GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
-            GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
-            unset IFS
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
+                export IFS=$','
+                GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
+                GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
+                unset IFS
                 # We harvest the emails manually, so force git not to.
                 eval "git send-email $GIT_TO $GIT_CC --no-chain-reply-to --suppress-cc=all $PATCH"
                 if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then
@@ -172,6 +178,7 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
             ;;
         sendmail)
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
                 # Insert To and CC headers via formail to keep them separate and
                 # appending them to the sendmail command as -- $TO $CC has
                 # proven to be an exercise in futility.
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 8/8] scripts/send-pull-request: Add CC selectively

Quoted 8 lines · Khem Raj

Currently a consolidated pull request adds all the participants to every patch, which in essence is good but might lose focus of developers who would be interested to know about the patch that developer contributed to. This patch fixes the script by extracting the to and cc information from each patch one by one and add it to patch mail header instead of doing a sweeping one pass over all patches to collect all email addresses. It should reduce some email traffic for developers.

This behavior was intentional. If you don't want the CC applied to the entire series, you can just use git-send-email as this is its behavior. In particular, it doesn't apply any of the addresses from the patches to the cover letter, which was my primary objection.

If you would like to modify this patch to apply the entire CC list to the cover letter, then I think you'll have addressed both of our concerns and I'll add my Acked-by. As it is, please do not accept this patch. I will nack it for poky and we don't want the two to diverge.

Please include the primary author/maintainer of sources/recipes/etc. on CC.

Thanks,

Signature · 3 lines
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
Quoted 99 lines
---
 scripts/send-pull-request |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
scripts/send-pull-request +29 -22
index 3af2a9f..36a89f4 100755
@@ -29,24 +29,38 @@ EOM
 # Collect To and CC addresses from the patch files if they exist
 # $1: Which header to add the recipients to, "TO" or "CC"
 # $2: The regex to match and strip from the line with email addresses
+# $3: The patch which we are preparing to send
 harvest_recipients()
 {
     TO_CC=$1
     REGX=$2
+    PATCH=$3
     export IFS=$',\n'
-    for PATCH in $PDIR/*.patch; do
-        # Grab To addresses
-        for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
-            if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
-            elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
-            fi
-        done
+    # Grab To addresses
+    for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
+        if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
+        elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
+        fi
     done
     unset IFS
 }
 
+# $1: The given patch
+create_recipient_lists()
+{
+    THEPATCH=$1
+    # Harvest emails from the generated patch and populate the TO and CC variables
+    # In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
+    # etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
+    if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
+        harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *" $THEPATCH
+    fi
+}
+
 
 # Parse and verify arguments
 while getopts "af:ghp:t:" OPT; do
@@ -100,15 +114,6 @@ for TOKEN in SUBJECT BLURB; do
 done
 
 
-# Harvest emails from the generated patches and populate the TO and CC variables
-# In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
-# etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
-if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
-    harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *"
-fi
-
 case "$PULL_MTA" in
     git)
         FROM="$(git config sendemail.from)"
@@ -158,11 +163,12 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
     ERROR=0
     case "$PULL_MTA" in
         git)
-            export IFS=$','
-            GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
-            GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
-            unset IFS
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
+                export IFS=$','
+                GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
+                GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
+                unset IFS
                 # We harvest the emails manually, so force git not to.
                 eval "git send-email $GIT_TO $GIT_CC --no-chain-reply-to --suppress-cc=all $PATCH"
                 if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then
@@ -172,6 +178,7 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
             ;;
         sendmail)
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
                 # Insert To and CC headers via formail to keep them separate and
                 # appending them to the sendmail command as -- $TO $CC has
                 # proven to be an exercise in futility.
Signature · 2 lines
Darren Hart
Yocto Linux Kernel
author
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 8/8] scripts/send-pull-request: Add CC selectively

Quoted 10 lines · Darren Hart
Quoted 8 lines · Khem Raj

Currently a consolidated pull request adds all the participants to every patch, which in essence is good but might lose focus of developers who would be interested to know about the patch that developer contributed to. This patch fixes the script by extracting the to and cc information from each patch one by one and add it to patch mail header instead of doing a sweeping one pass over all patches to collect all email addresses. It should reduce some email traffic for developers.

Quoted 2 lines

This behavior was intentional. If you don't want the CC applied to the entire series, you can just use git-send-email as this is its behavior.

imho git request-pull would have been sufficient for us along with git send-mail to post all patches for review
and get acks and sign-offs then the they all can be collected using patchwork or whatever way one likes and
then git pull-request can be sent

Right now one one sends a pull requests and publishes the tree for pull then feedback is given and one does another round and repulishes the tree. So having all patches sent for review using git send-mail and then form pull-requests once they are approved would be a way to go

Quoted 2 lines

In particular, it doesn't apply any of the addresses from the patches to the cover letter, which was my primary objection.

yes once I did this I was sort of thinking that it would be appropriate to CC all concerned on cover letter Should be doable.

Quoted 8 lines

If you would like to modify this patch to apply the entire CC list to the cover letter, then I think you'll have addressed both of our concerns and I'll add my Acked-by. As it is, please do not accept this patch. I will nack it for poky and we don't want the two to diverge.

Please include the primary author/maintainer of sources/recipes/etc. on CC.

I guess this should be automated somehow too.

Quoted 118 lines

Thanks,

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

Quoted 97 lines

---
 scripts/send-pull-request |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------

 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
scripts/send-pull-request +1 -0
index 3af2a9f..36a89f4 100755
@@ -29,24 +29,38 @@ EOM
  # Collect To and CC addresses from the patch files if they exist
  # $1: Which header to add the recipients to, "TO" or "CC"
  # $2: The regex to match and strip from the line with email addresses
+# $3: The patch which we are preparing to send
  harvest_recipients()
  {

     TO_CC=$1
     REGX=$2
+    PATCH=$3
     export IFS=$',\n'
-    for PATCH in $PDIR/*.patch; do
-        # Grab To addresses
-        for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
-            if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
-            elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
-            fi
-        done
+    # Grab To addresses
+    for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
+        if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
+        elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
+        fi
     done
     unset IFS
 }

scripts/send-pull-request +14 -0
+# $1: The given patch
+create_recipient_lists()
+{
+    THEPATCH=$1
+    # Harvest emails from the generated patch and populate the TO and CC variables
+    # In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
+    # etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
+    if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
+        harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *" $THEPATCH
+    fi
+}
+

 # Parse and verify arguments
 while getopts "af:ghp:t:" OPT; do

scripts/send-pull-request +0 -0
@@ -100,15 +114,6 @@ for TOKEN in SUBJECT BLURB; do

 done

scripts/send-pull-request +0 -9
-# Harvest emails from the generated patches and populate the TO and CC variables
-# In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
-# etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
-if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
-    harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *"
-fi
-

 case "$PULL_MTA" in
     git)
         FROM="$(git config sendemail.from)"

scripts/send-pull-request +0 -0
@@ -158,11 +163,12 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then

     ERROR=0
     case "$PULL_MTA" in
         git)
-            export IFS=$','
-            GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
-            GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
-            unset IFS
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
+                export IFS=$','
+                GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
+                GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
+                unset IFS
                 # We harvest the emails manually, so force git not to.
                 eval "git send-email $GIT_TO $GIT_CC --no-chain-reply-to --suppress-cc=all $PATCH" if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then

scripts/send-pull-request +0 -0
@@ -172,6 +178,7 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
              ;;
          sendmail)

             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
                 # Insert To and CC headers via formail to keep them separate and

Quoted 2 lines
                 # appending them to the sendmail command as -- $TO $CC has
                 # proven to be an exercise in futility.

--
Darren Hart
Yocto Linux Kernel

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 8/8] scripts/send-pull-request: Add CC selectively

Quoted 2 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 1 line · Darren Hart

On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 00:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

Hi Khem,

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Currently a consolidated pull request adds all the participants to every patch, which in essence is good but might lose focus of developers who would be interested to know about the patch that developer contributed to. This patch fixes the script by extracting the to and cc information from each patch one by one and add it to patch mail header instead of doing a sweeping one pass over all patches to collect all email addresses. It should reduce some email traffic for developers.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

This behavior was intentional. If you don't want the CC applied to the entire series, you can just use git-send-email as this is its behavior.

imho git request-pull would have been sufficient for us along with git send-mail to post all patches for review

Right. So some context on why I wrote this pair of scripts. There was an existing practice amongst the poky developers to only send a pull request and no patches, which effectively reduced the level of code review by complicating access to the patches for potential reviewers. IIRC there was an existing script to generate the pull request.

In order to facilitate adoption of a new process which sent the patches to the list, but still kept the pull model that the community was accustomed to, I wrote the new scripts. I chose to avoid using git-send-email as not everyone had git setup to do mail, and I wasn't aware of "git request-pull" at the time. I always found not having all the CCs on the cover letter to be very frustrating, and defeating the purpose of the auto-cc feature, which is why I manually collect the CC.

After some experience using these scripts, I agree that CC'ing the entire list on EVERY patch is probably overkill, and can lead to annoying people. I added a task to the Yocto Janitors list to use request-pull to generate the cover letter. One to keep the CC list local to each recipe is also a good idea.

Quoted 24 lines

and get acks and sign-offs then the they all can be collected using patchwork or whatever way one likes and
then git pull-request can be sent

Right now one one sends a pull requests and publishes the tree for pull then feedback is given and one does another round and repulishes the tree. So having all patches sent for review using git send-mail and then form pull-requests once they are approved would be a way to go

Quoted 2 lines

In particular, it doesn't apply any of the addresses from the patches to the cover letter, which was my primary objection.

yes once I did this I was sort of thinking that it would be appropriate to CC all concerned on cover letter Should be doable.

Quoted 6 lines

If you would like to modify this patch to apply the entire CC list to the cover letter, then I think you'll have addressed both of our concerns and I'll add my Acked-by. As it is, please do not accept this patch. I will nack it for poky and we don't want the two to diverge.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Please include the primary author/maintainer of sources/recipes/etc. on CC.

I guess this should be automated somehow too.

That is a bit more tricky as there can be a long list of people involved with a particular file. Just doing a "git log FILE" is often enough to let you know who you're collaborating with, and who you need to CC.

--
Darren

Quoted 124 lines
Quoted 114 lines

Thanks,

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

Quoted 92 lines
---
 scripts/send-pull-request |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
scripts/send-pull-request +28 -22
index 3af2a9f..36a89f4 100755
@@ -29,24 +29,38 @@ EOM
 # Collect To and CC addresses from the patch files if they exist
 # $1: Which header to add the recipients to, "TO" or "CC"
 # $2: The regex to match and strip from the line with email addresses
+# $3: The patch which we are preparing to send
 harvest_recipients()
 {
     TO_CC=$1
     REGX=$2
+    PATCH=$3
     export IFS=$',\n'
-    for PATCH in $PDIR/*.patch; do
-        # Grab To addresses
-        for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
-            if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
-            elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
-                if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
-            fi
-        done
+    # Grab To addresses
+    for EMAIL in $(sed '/^---$/q' $PATCH | grep -e "$REGX" | sed "s/$REGX//"); do
+        if [ "$TO_CC" == "TO" ] && [ "${TO/$EMAIL/}" == "$TO" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$TO" ]; then TO=$EMAIL; else TO="$TO,$EMAIL"; fi
+        elif [ "$TO_CC" == "CC" ] && [ "${CC/$EMAIL/}" == "$CC" ] && [ -n "$EMAIL" ]; then
+           if [ -z "$CC" ]; then CC=$EMAIL; else CC="$CC,$EMAIL"; fi
+        fi
     done
     unset IFS
 }
 
+# $1: The given patch
+create_recipient_lists()
+{
+    THEPATCH=$1
+    # Harvest emails from the generated patch and populate the TO and CC variables
+    # In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
+    # etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
+    if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
+        harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *" $THEPATCH
+        harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *" $THEPATCH
+    fi
+}
+
 
 # Parse and verify arguments
 while getopts "af:ghp:t:" OPT; do
@@ -100,15 +114,6 @@ for TOKEN in SUBJECT BLURB; do
 done
 
 
-# Harvest emails from the generated patches and populate the TO and CC variables
-# In addition to To and CC headers/lines, the common Signed-off-by, Tested-by,
-# etc. (*-by) will be added to CC.
-if [ $AUTO -eq 1 ]; then
-    harvest_recipients TO "^[Tt][Oo]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^[Cc][Cc]: *"
-    harvest_recipients CC "^.*-[Bb][Yy]: *"
-fi
-
 case "$PULL_MTA" in
     git)
         FROM="$(git config sendemail.from)"
@@ -158,11 +163,12 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
     ERROR=0
     case "$PULL_MTA" in
         git)
-            export IFS=$','
-            GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
-            GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
-            unset IFS
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
+                export IFS=$','
+                GIT_TO=$(for R in $TO; do echo -n "--to='$R' "; done)
+                GIT_CC=$(for R in $CC; do echo -n "--cc='$R' "; done)
+                unset IFS
                 # We harvest the emails manually, so force git not to.
                 eval "git send-email $GIT_TO $GIT_CC --no-chain-reply-to --suppress-cc=all $PATCH"
                 if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then

scripts/send-pull-request if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then · line 184

Quoted 7 lines
scripts/send-pull-request +1 -0
@@ -172,6 +178,7 @@ if [ "$cont" == "y" ] || [ "$cont" == "Y" ]; then
             ;;
         sendmail)
             for PATCH in $PDIR/*patch; do
+                create_recipient_lists $PATCH
                 # Insert To and CC headers via formail to keep them separate and
                 # appending them to the sendmail command as -- $TO $CC has
                 # proven to be an exercise in futility.

--
Darren Hart
Yocto Linux Kernel

Quoted 5 lines

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Signature · 2 lines
Darren Hart
Yocto Linux Kernel