Revert "regulator: Move VCOINCELL to be the last element of mc13892_regulators array"
PATCH 1/1 Revert "regulator: Move VCOINCELL to be the last element of mc13892_regulators array"
I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug because MC13xxx_DEFINE explictly defines the order of each entry in the array.
Thus revert the patch.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
--- drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c +1 -1
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops mc13892_sw_regulator_ops; mc13xxx_regulator_ops) static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = { +MC13892_DEFINE_REGU (VCOINCELL ,POWERCTL0 ,POWERCTL0 , mc13892_vcoincell),MC13892_SW_DEFINE (SW1 ,SWITCHERS0 ,SWITCHERS0 , mc13892_sw1),MC13892_SW_DEFINE (SW2 ,SWITCHERS1 ,SWITCHERS1 , mc13892_sw),MC13892_SW_DEFINE (SW3 ,SWITCHERS2 ,SWITCHERS2 , mc13892_sw),
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = {MC13892_GPO_DEFINE (GPO4 ,POWERMISC , mc13892_gpo),MC13892_GPO_DEFINE (PWGT1SPI ,POWERMISC , mc13892_pwgtdrv), MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(PWGT2SPI, POWERMISC, mc13892_pwgtdrv), - MC13892_DEFINE_REGU(VCOINCELL, POWERCTL0, POWERCTL0, mc13892_vcoincell), }; static int mc13892_powermisc_rmw(struct mc13xxx_regulator_priv *priv, u32 mask,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Quoted 6 lines · Axel Lin
I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug because
MC13xxx_DEFINEexplictly defines the order of each entry in the array.Thus revert the patch.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Acked-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>
but this seems like something error prone that we probably want to consider fixing anyway?
Liam Girdwood
AppliedQuoted 6 lines · Axel Lin
I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug because
MC13xxx_DEFINEexplictly defines the order of each entry in the array.Thus revert the patch.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Applied.