Let opkg-build allow uppercase letters
cover Let opkg-build allow uppercase letters
Majority of the changes are backported from OE one additional patch is to opkg-utils/opkg-build to allow uppercase letters.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: kraj/opkg
Browse: http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/opkg
Thanks,
Khem Raj <[email protected]>
---
Khem Raj (2):
opkg: Synchronise with OE
opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
.../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch | 29 +++++++++++++ .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb | 8 +++- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 7 ++- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch | 36 ---------------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure | 25 +++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 -------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 23 ++-------- 8 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/2 opkg: Synchronise with OE
Remove use of IMAGE_ROOTFS which was making sstage to install ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/${sysconfdir}/rcS.d into the dir where it was built first time. So if you moved the tmpdir it would still create this directory in old tmpdir and anyway its not needed
All the patches that it was applying are not needed anymore so we delete them
Install opkg configure script
--- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 7 ++-- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch | 36 ---------------------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure | 25 +++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 ----------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 23 +++----------- 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc +4 -3
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" PKGSUFFIX = "" PKGSUFFIX_virtclass-nativesdk = "-nativesdk" -# Define a variable to allow distros to run configure earlier. -# (for example, to enable loading of ethernet kernel modules before networking starts) -POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION ?= "98" +do_install_prepend() { + install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/rcS.d + install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/configure ${D}${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S40configure +}
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch deleted +0 -36
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@ -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [function not used] - -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.c -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:40:34.000000000 +0000 -@@ -876,3 +876,18 @@ - - return ret; - } -+ -+int -+opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2) -+{ -+ pkg_t *pkg1, *pkg2; -+ -+ pkg1 = pkg_new(); -+ pkg2 = pkg_new(); -+ -+ parse_version(pkg1, ver1); -+ parse_version(pkg2, ver2); -+ -+ return pkg_compare_versions(pkg1, pkg2); -+} -+ -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.h -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:35:19.000000000 +0000 -@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ - - int opkg_repository_accessibility_check(void); - -+int opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2); -+ - #endif /* OPKG_H */
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure new file +25 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# get splash funcs +if [ -f /etc/default/splashfuncs ]; then + . /etc/default/splashfuncs +## tell boot status to "pulsate" really long busy cycle here +status_pulse || true +fi + +# run configure in bg +if [ -f /etc/default/splashfuncs ]; then + opkg-cl configure & + PID=$! + + # while configure still running loop + while test -d /proc/$PID; do + # tick to splash so it doesn't time out + status_tick || true + sleep 1 + done +else + opkg-cl configure +fi + +# delete myself +rm -f /etc/rcS.d/S40configure
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch deleted +0 -19
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -Without this, the FILE reference in this header can cause compile issues. - -RP - 29/1/10 - -Upstream-Status: Pending - -Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg_dest.h -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg_dest.h 2010-01-29 09:37:22.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/pkg_dest.h 2010-01-29 09:37:33.000000000 +0000 -@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ - #ifndef PKG_DEST_H - #define PKG_DEST_H - -+#include <stdio.h> -+ - typedef struct pkg_dest pkg_dest_t; - struct pkg_dest - {
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb +5 -18
@@ -10,15 +10,14 @@ PACKAGE_ARCH_update-alternatives-cworth = "all" RREPLACES_${PN} = "opkg-nogpg" SRC_URI = "svn://opkg.googlecode.com/svn;module=trunk;proto=http \ - file://add_vercmp.patch \ - file://headerfix.patch \ -" + file://configure \ + " S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk" SRCREV = "609" PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}" -PR = "r2" +PR = "r3" PACKAGES =+ "libopkg${PKGSUFFIX}-dev libopkg${PKGSUFFIX} update-alternatives-cworth${PKGSUFFIX}"
@@ -32,22 +31,10 @@ do_install_append() { } pkg_postinst_${PN} () { -#!/bin/sh -if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then - install -d ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/${sysconfdir}/rcS.d - # this happens at S98 where our good 'ole packages script used to run - echo "#!/bin/sh -opkg-cl configure -rm -f /${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure -" > $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure - chmod 0755 $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure -fi - -update-alternatives --install ${bindir}/opkg opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl 100 + update-alternatives --install ${bindir}/opkg opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl 100 } pkg_postrm_${PN} () { -#!/bin/sh -update-alternatives --remove opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl + update-alternatives --remove opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
Re: [PATCH 1/2] opkg: Synchronise with OE
Quoted 7 lines · Khem Raj
Remove use of
IMAGE_ROOTFSwhich was making sstage to install ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/${sysconfdir}/rcS.d into the dir where it was built first time. So if you moved the tmpdir it would still create this directory in old tmpdir and anyway its not neededAll the patches that it was applying are not needed anymore so we delete them
packagekit's opkg support required the add_vercmp patch?
Why not just s/${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/$D/ rather than remove a load of functionality which people use?
This patch is at best very confusing and misleading as you do more than you say in the above commit message...
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 176 lines
Install opkg configure script
Signed-off-by Khem Raj <[email protected]>--- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 7 ++-- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch | 36 ---------------------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure | 25 +++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 ----------- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 23 +++----------- 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patchmeta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc +4
-3@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" PKGSUFFIX = "" PKGSUFFIX_virtclass-nativesdk = "-nativesdk" -# Define a variable to allow distros to run configure earlier. -# (for example, to enable loading of ethernet kernel modules before networking starts) -POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION ?= "98" +do_install_prepend() { + install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/rcS.d + install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/configure ${D}${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S40configure +}meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/add_vercmp.patch deleted +0
-36@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@ -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [function not used] - -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.c -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.c 2010-01-26 20:40:34.000000000 +0000 -@@ -876,3 +876,18 @@ - - return ret; - } -+ -+int -+opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2) -+{ -+ pkg_t *pkg1, *pkg2; -+ -+ pkg1 = pkg_new(); -+ pkg2 = pkg_new(); -+ -+ parse_version(pkg1, ver1); -+ parse_version(pkg2, ver2); -+ -+ return pkg_compare_versions(pkg1, pkg2); -+} -+ -Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg.h -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:32:19.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/opkg.h 2010-01-26 20:35:19.000000000 +0000 -@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ - - int opkg_repository_accessibility_check(void); - -+int opkg_compare_versions (const char *ver1, const char *ver2); -+ - #endif /* OPKG_H */meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/configure new file +25
-0@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# get splash funcs +if [ -f /etc/default/splashfuncs ]; then + . /etc/default/splashfuncs +## tell boot status to "pulsate" really long busy cycle here +status_pulse || true +fi + +# run configure in bg +if [ -f /etc/default/splashfuncs ]; then + opkg-cl configure & + PID=$! + + # while configure still running loop + while test -d /proc/$PID; do + # tick to splash so it doesn't time out + status_tick || true + sleep 1 + done +else + opkg-cl configure +fi + +# delete myself +rm -f /etc/rcS.d/S40configuremeta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch deleted +0
-19@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -Without this, the FILE reference in this header can cause compile issues. - -RP - 29/1/10 - -Upstream-Status: Pending - -Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg_dest.h -=================================================================== ---- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg_dest.h 2010-01-29 09:37:22.000000000 +0000 -+++ trunk/libopkg/pkg_dest.h 2010-01-29 09:37:33.000000000 +0000 -@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ - #ifndef PKG_DEST_H - #define PKG_DEST_H - -+#include <stdio.h> -+ - typedef struct pkg_dest pkg_dest_t; - struct pkg_dest - {meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb +5
-18@@ -10,15 +10,14 @@ PACKAGE_ARCH_update-alternatives-cworth = "all" RREPLACES_${PN} = "opkg-nogpg" SRC_URI = "svn://opkg.googlecode.com/svn;module=trunk;proto=http \ - file://add_vercmp.patch \ - file://headerfix.patch \ -" + file://configure \ + " S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk" SRCREV = "609" PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}" -PR = "r2" +PR = "r3" PACKAGES =+ "libopkg${PKGSUFFIX}-dev libopkg${PKGSUFFIX} update-alternatives-cworth${PKGSUFFIX}"@@ -32,22 +31,10 @@ do_install_append() { } pkg_postinst_${PN} () { -#!/bin/sh -if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then - install -d ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/${sysconfdir}/rcS.d - # this happens at S98 where our good 'ole packages script used to run - echo "#!/bin/sh -opkg-cl configure -rm -f /${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure -" > $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure - chmod 0755 $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}configure -fi - -update-alternatives --install ${bindir}/opkg opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl 100 + update-alternatives --install ${bindir}/opkg opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl 100 } pkg_postrm_${PN} () { -#!/bin/sh -update-alternatives --remove opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl + update-alternatives --remove opkg ${bindir}/opkg-cl }
PATCH 2/2 opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
In reply to Khem RajSome packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
Import mtime-int.patch from OE commitc81990aecae3bdf70a7c924699776b248ab7a006
--- .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch | 29 +++++++++++++ .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb | 8 +++- 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch new file +29 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Convert mtime to int before comparing it + +The st_mtime attribute (which is a float) is compared against a value +from the timestamp database, which was stored as an integer there. + +When working on a filesystem with precise timestamps the comparision +will fail nearly everytime hence. + +Although it might be possible to enhance the database to store the +fractional part too, this will complicate things more than we would +gain by this change. + +Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <[email protected]> + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +Index: opkg-utils/opkg-make-index +=================================================================== +--- opkg-utils.orig/opkg-make-index ++++ opkg-utils/opkg-make-index +@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ for filename in files: + pkg = None + fnameStat = os.stat(filename) + if old_pkg_hash.has_key(basename): +- if pkgsStamps.has_key(basename) and fnameStat.st_mtime == pkgsStamps[basename]: ++ if pkgsStamps.has_key(basename) and int(fnameStat.st_mtime) == pkgsStamps[basename]: + if (verbose): + sys.stderr.write("Found %s in Packages\n" % (filename,)) + pkg = old_pkg_hash[basename]
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch new file +44 -0
44 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb +6 -2
@@ -9,10 +9,13 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python" RDEPENDS_${PN}_virtclass-native = "" SRCREV = "4747" PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}" -PR = "r2" +PR = "r3" SRC_URI = "svn://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/;module=opkg-utils;proto=http \ - file://index-ignore-filenotfound.patch" + file://index-ignore-filenotfound.patch \ + file://mtime-int.patch \ + file://uppercase-letters.patch \ + " S = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-utils"
@@ -24,3 +27,4 @@ do_install() { } BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" +TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
2011/5/19 Khem Raj <[email protected]>
Quoted 28 lines
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
Import mtime-int.patch from OE commit
c81990aecae3bdf70a7c924699776b248ab7a006Signed-off-by Khem Raj <[email protected]>--- .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch | 29 +++++++++++++ .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb | 8 +++- 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patchmeta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch new file +1
-0@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Convert mtime to int before comparing it
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch line 11
Quoted 10 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch new file +10
-0+ +The st_mtime attribute (which is a float) is compared against a value +from the timestamp database, which was stored as an integer there. + +When working on a filesystem with precise timestamps the comparision +will fail nearly everytime hence. + +Although it might be possible to enhance the database to store the +fractional part too, this will complicate things more than we would +gain by this change.
This part is not covered by the commit message. Was it intended to be in here.?
Rest of the patch looks fine to me.
Frans
Quoted 114 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch new file +14
-0+ +Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <[email protected]> + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +Index: opkg-utils/opkg-make-index +=================================================================== +--- opkg-utils.orig/opkg-make-index ++++ opkg-utils/opkg-make-index +@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ for filename in files: + pkg = None + fnameStat = os.stat(filename) + if old_pkg_hash.has_key(basename): +- if pkgsStamps.has_key(basename) and fnameStat.st_mtime ==pkgsStamps[basename]:
++ ifpkgsStamps.has_key(basename)andint(fnameStat.st_mtime)==
pkgsStamps[basename]:meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch new file +3
-0+ if (verbose): + sys.stderr.write("Found %s in Packages\n" % (filename,)) + pkg = old_pkg_hash[basename]diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patchb/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patchnew file mode 100644
index 0000000..689d780meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch new file +5
-0@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +when building packages, accept uppercase letters in the package name +Fixes issues like + + +| Packaged contents of kernel into
/home/kraj/work/angstrom/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/efikamx-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linux-efikamx-2.6.31-r0/deploy-ipks/efikamx/kernel_2.6.31-r0_efikamx.ipk+| kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1
+| *** Error: Package name contains illegal characters, (other than
[a-z0-9.+-])+| +| opkg-build: Please fix the above errors and try again. +| ERROR: Function 'opkg-build execution failed' failedmeta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch new file +14
-0+ +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> + +Upstream-Status: Pending +Index: opkg-utils/opkg-buildpackage +=================================================================== +--- opkg-utils.orig/opkg-buildpackage ++++ opkg-utils/opkg-buildpackage +@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ pkg_appears_sane_control() { + required_field Maintainer >/dev/null + required_field Description >/dev/null + +- if echo $pkg | grep '[^a-z0-9.+-]'; then +- echo "opkg-build: Error: Package name $name containsillegal characters, (other than [a-z0-9.+-])"
++ if echo $pkg | grep '[^a-zA-Z0-9.+-]'; then
++ echo "opkg-build: Error: Package name $name contains
illegal characters, (other than [a-zA-Z0-9.+-])"meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch new file +13
-0+ PKG_ERROR=1; + fi + +Index: opkg-utils/opkg-build +=================================================================== +--- opkg-utils.orig/opkg-build ++++ opkg-utils/opkg-build +@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ You probably want to chown these to a sy + disallowed_filename=`disallowed_field Filename` + [ "$?" -ne 0 ] && PKG_ERROR=1 + +- if echo $pkg | grep '[^a-z0-9.+-]'; then +- echo "*** Error: Package name $name contains illegalcharacters, (other than [a-z0-9.+-])" >&2
++ if echo $pkg | grep '[^a-zA-Z0-9.+-]'; then
++ echo "*** Error: Package name $name contains illegal
characters, (other than [a-zA-Z0-9.+-])" >&2meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/uppercase-letters.patch new file +3
-0+ PKG_ERROR=1; + fi +(quoted diff) +0
-0opkg-utils_svn.bb
index 0db6f80..7e4c6e4 100644meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb +6
-3@@ -9,10 +9,13 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python" RDEPENDS_${PN}_virtclass-native = "" SRCREV = "4747" PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}" -PR = "r2" +PR = "r3" SRC_URI = "svn:// svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/;module=opkg-utils;proto=http \ - file://index-ignore-filenotfound.patch" + file://index-ignore-filenotfound.patch \ + file://mtime-int.patch \ + file://uppercase-letters.patch \ + " S = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-utils"@@ -24,3 +27,4 @@ do_install() { } BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" +TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" --1.7.4.1
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
In reply to Khem RajQuoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
This is not a good idea. Uppercase characters have never been permitted in .deb/.ipk.
Isn't legitimize_package_name() crunching them to lower case for you? If not then I think it should be made to do that.
p.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
Quoted 10 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
This is not a good idea. Uppercase characters have never been permitted in .deb/.ipk.
Isn't
legitimize_package_name()crunching them to lower case for you? If not then I think it should be made to do that.
I just checked the code and it certainly looks like it should be doing that:
# Remaining package name validity fixes
return s.lower().replace('_', '-').replace('@', '+').replace(',', '+').replace('/', '-')So if that isn't working for you then I think it needs a bit of debugging.
p.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
Op 20 mei 2011, om 17:01 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 12 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 10 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 3 lines
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
This is not a good idea. Uppercase characters have never been permitted in .deb/.ipk.
Isn't
legitimize_package_name()crunching them to lower case for you? If not then I think it should be made to do that.
Quoted 8 lines
I just checked the code and it certainly looks like it should be doing that:
# Remaining package name validity fixes return s.lower().replace('_', '-').replace('@', '+').replace(',', '+').replace('/', '-')So if that isn't working for you then I think it needs a bit of debugging.
Does that run on PV or PN? I think Khem has weird things in PV
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
In reply to Phil BlundellQuoted 12 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 10 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
This is not a good idea. Uppercase characters have never been permitted in .deb/.ipk.
Isn't
legitimize_package_name()crunching them to lower case for you? If not then I think it should be made to do that.
Quoted 8 lines
I just checked the code and it certainly looks like it should be doing that:
# Remaining package name validity fixes return s.lower().replace('_', '-').replace('@', '+').replace(',', '+').replace('/', '-')So if that isn't working for you then I think it needs a bit of debugging.
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I was waiting for a second ack.
Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send an ack or push this patch.
Regards,
Andreas
Richard Purdie
AppliedRe: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
Quoted 19 lines · Andreas Oberritter
Quoted 18 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 10 lines · Phil Blundell
Quoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with uppercase-letters.patch
This is not a good idea. Uppercase characters have never been permitted in .deb/.ipk.
Isn't
legitimize_package_name()crunching them to lower case for you? If not then I think it should be made to do that.I just checked the code and it certainly looks like it should be doing that:
# Remaining package name validity fixes return s.lower().replace('_', '-').replace('@', '+').replace(',', '+').replace('/', '-')
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So if that isn't working for you then I think it needs a bit of debugging.
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I was waiting for a second ack.
Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send an ack or push this patch.
I merged this to OE-Core since I happened to look at it :)
Cheers,
Richard
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
In reply to Andreas OberritterQuoted 6 lines · Andreas Oberritter
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I was waiting for a second ack.
Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send an ack or push this patch.
yes it does thanks. I meant to look for this before I butchered opkg-utils but my memory did not serve me well.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names
Op 20 mei 2011, om 20:35 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines · Andreas Oberritter
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I was waiting for a second ack.
Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send an ack or push this patch.
yes it does thanks. I meant to look for this before I butchered opkg-utils but my memory did not serve me well.
With a build from scratch I get:
| * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-base: | * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package task-base. | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-base-extended: | * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * kernel-2.6.31.12-ER1 * | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package task-base-extended.
Quoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Majority of the changes are backported from OE one additional patch is to opkg-utils/opkg-build to allow uppercase letters.
Upperspace package names are a violation of debian packaging guidelines (which OE has aimed to roughly follow) and will break the debian package backend. At the very least some kind of translation is needed there before this gets enabled.
Where did this requirement come from?
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 5 lines · Richard Purdie
Quoted 3 lines · Khem Raj
Majority of the changes are backported from OE one additional patch is to opkg-utils/opkg-build to allow uppercase letters.
Quoted 7 lines
Upperspace package names are a violation of debian packaging guidelines (which OE has aimed to roughly follow) and will break the debian package backend. At the very least some kind of translation is needed there before this gets enabled.
Where did this requirement come from?
I was building kernel for efikamx wich has some uppercase chars appended to version
but I think I can patch the kernel for that and we can drop uppercase-letters.patch
Do you want me to update the patch ?
Quoted 10 lines
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core