checkpatch: suggest spaces around binary operators in strict mode
PATCH 1/1 checkpatch: suggest spaces around binary operators in strict mode
--- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
scripts/checkpatch.pl +2 -0
@@ -2167,6 +2167,8 @@ sub process { if ($ctx =~ /Wx[^WCE]|[^WCE]xW/) { ERROR("need consistent spacing around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr); + } elsif ($ctx =~ /[^WCE]x[^WCE]/) { + CHK("spaces suggested around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr); } # A colon needs no spaces before when it is
Joe Perches
maintainerQuoted 10 lines · Pavel Roskin
Signed-off-by Pavel Roskin <[email protected]>--- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)scripts/checkpatch.pl +0
-0
scripts/checkpatch.pl sub process { · line 2171
Quoted 5 lines
scripts/checkpatch.pl +2
-0@@ -2167,6 +2167,8 @@ sub process { if ($ctx =~ /Wx[^WCE]|[^WCE]xW/) { ERROR("need consistent spacing around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr); + } elsif ($ctx =~ /[^WCE]x[^WCE]/) { + CHK("spaces suggested around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr);
Hey Pavel.
This should probably not be an elsif but
a standalone test.
Also, there's an upcoming patch in mm that
classifies all output ERROR/WARN/CHK types.
This one should be "SPACING".
Quoted 19 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 10 lines · Pavel Roskin
Signed-off-by Pavel Roskin<[email protected]>--- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)scripts/checkpatch.pl +0
-0scripts/checkpatch.pl sub process { · line 2171
Quoted 5 lines
scripts/checkpatch.pl +2
-0@@ -2167,6 +2167,8 @@ sub process { if ($ctx =~ /Wx[^WCE]|[^WCE]xW/) { ERROR("need consistent spacing around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr); + } elsif ($ctx =~ /[^WCE]x[^WCE]/) { + CHK("spaces suggested around '$op' $at\n" . $hereptr);Hey Pavel.
Quoted 2 lines
This should probably not be an elsif but
a standalone test.
Maybe. I just tried to minimize the changes. I think all of the operators in the condition above the lines I changed need spaces around them, so I decided to reuse the code block.
Spaces around binary operands are pretty standard. scripts/Lindent would add them.
I understand that not everybody wants that rule enforced, so I used a nicely worded warning and enabled it only in the strict mode. That was done to avoid sparking a flamewar about formatting.
There are some cases when missing spaces are palatable, in particular with "|", which is thin. So this may be OK:
(high_id << 8)|(low_id & 0xff)
But I've seen checkpatch ignore stuff like this:
ah->ah_gain.g_current-ah->ah_gain.g_f_corr
And that is just horrible on the eyes. I want checkpatch to catch that.
Quoted 4 lines
Also, there's an upcoming patch in mm that
classifies all output ERROR/WARN/CHK types.This one should be "SPACING".
OK, please keep my suggestion in mind.
Signature · 2 lines
Regards, Pavel Roskin