Skip to contentSkip to conversation

x86, intel: Output microcode revision v7

PATCH Applied Andi Kleen 2 participants 4 messages Oct 13, 2011 – Oct 14, 2011

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Andi Kleen

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 x86, intel: Output microcode revision v7

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.

The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together with the other CPUID model information.

I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated it fills in the new values too.

I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being optimized away when the result is not used.

This turns out to clean up further code which already got this information manually. This is done in followon patches.

v2:  Lots of updates based on feedback.
v3:  Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
v4:  minor updates. rebased.
v5:  move MSR read to early_intel_init()
v6:  Use sync_core() instead of CPUID 1. Drop a white space change.
v7:  Add Acked-bys.
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |    9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c  |    9 +++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   14 +++++---------
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +3 -1
index 0d1171c..b650435 100644
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 #endif
+	u32			microcode;
 } __attribute__((__aligned__(SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
 
 #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL	0
@@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ static inline void native_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
 	      "=b" (*ebx),
 	      "=c" (*ecx),
 	      "=d" (*edx)
-	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx));
+	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx)
+	    : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c +9 -0
index ed6086e..26627a3 100644
@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		(c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 
+	if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
+		unsigned lower_word;
+
+		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
+		/* Required by the SDM */
+		sync_core();
+		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Atom erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41:
 	 *
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +7 -2
index 08363b0..8af6fa4 100644
@@ -217,8 +217,13 @@ static void print_mce(struct mce *m)
 		pr_cont("MISC %llx ", m->misc);
 
 	pr_cont("\n");
-	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x\n",
-		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid);
+	/*
+	 * Note this output is parsed by external tools and old fields
+	 * should not be changed.
+	 */
+	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x microcode %u\n",
+		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid,
+		cpu_data(m->extcpu).microcode);
 
 	/*
 	 * Print out human-readable details about the MCE error,
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +2 -0
index 62ac8cb..6254fda 100644
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
 	else
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
+	if (c->microcode)
+		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: %u\n", c->microcode);
 
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
 		unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c +5 -9
index 1a1b606..3ca42d0 100644
@@ -161,12 +161,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
 	}
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
-	sync_core();
-	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
-
+	csig->rev = c->microcode;
 	pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
 		cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
 
@@ -299,9 +294,9 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
 	unsigned int val[2];
-	int cpu_num;
+	int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
 
-	cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	mc_intel = uci->mc;
 
@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
+	/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
 	sync_core();
 
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
@@ -335,6 +330,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 		(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
+	c->microcode = val[1];
 
 	return 0;
 }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.4
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c +4 -11
index 26627a3..5231312 100644
@@ -64,17 +64,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.4
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3

In reply to Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode revision from cpu_data instead

v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
v3: Port to latest tree

---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   28 ++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c +4 -24
index 9323837..ce18c04 100644
@@ -325,15 +325,6 @@ static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
 	return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
 }
 
-static void __devinit get_ucode_rev_on_cpu(void *edx)
-{
-	u32 eax;
-
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-	sync_core();
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, eax, *(u32 *)edx);
-}
-
 static int create_name_attr(struct platform_data *pdata, struct device *dev)
 {
 	sysfs_attr_init(&pdata->name_attr.attr);
@@ -380,27 +371,16 @@ exit_free:
 static int __cpuinit chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-	int err;
-	u32 edx;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if we have problem with errata AE18 of Core processors:
 	 * Readings might stop update when processor visited too deep sleep,
 	 * fixed for stepping D0 (6EC).
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc) {
-		/* check for microcode update */
-		err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_ucode_rev_on_cpu,
-					       &edx, 1);
-		if (err) {
-			pr_err("Cannot determine microcode revision of "
-			       "CPU#%u (%d)!\n", cpu, err);
-			return -ENODEV;
-		} else if (edx < 0x39) {
-			pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
-			       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
+	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc && c->microcode < 0x39) {
+		pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
+		       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.4
Applied
#3 lore raw
In reply to Andi Kleen
Quoted 26 lines · Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.

The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together with the other CPUID model information.

I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated it fills in the new values too.

I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being optimized away when the result is not used.

This turns out to clean up further code which already got this information manually. This is done in followon patches.

v2:  Lots of updates based on feedback.
v3:  Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
v4:  minor updates. rebased.
v5:  move MSR read to early_intel_init()
v6:  Use sync_core() instead of CPUID 1. Drop a white space change.
v7:  Add Acked-bys.
Quoted 7 lines
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |    9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c  |    9 +++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   14 +++++---------
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Applied to tip:x86/microcode,

Thanks,

Ingo