5x slower guest disk performance with virtio disk
I have a CentOS 6 host system running a CentOS 6 KVM guest and the guest seems to get about 5x slower disk throughput than the host:
host $ sudo dd of=/dev/datavol/disk1 if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=50000 50000+0 records in
50000+0 records out
52428800000 bytes (52 GB) copied, 150.36 s, 349 MB/s
host $ ssh guest dd of=/dev/vdb if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=50000 50000+0 records in
50000+0 records out
52428800000 bytes (52 GB) copied, 731.007 s, 71.7 MB/s
This is actually a vast improvement over earlier tests where it was a factor of 40x difference. But even still, I thought virtio disks were supposed to be much closer to native host speed than 5x.
/dev/datavol/disk1 is a RAIDed LV in an LVM volume group consisting of 5 disks:
$ sudo pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/sda3 lvm2 a- 420.16g 420.16g /dev/sdb datavol lvm2 a- 465.76g 227.66g /dev/sdc datavol lvm2 a- 465.76g 245.76g /dev/sdd datavol lvm2 a- 465.76g 245.76g /dev/sde datavol lvm2 a- 465.76g 245.76g /dev/sdf datavol lvm2 a- 465.76g 245.76g $ sudo lvdisplay --maps /dev/datavol/disk1 --- Logical volume --- LV Name /dev/datavol/disk1 VG Name datavol LV UUID 3gD1N3-ybAU-GzUO-8QBV-b6op-lsK9-GMNm3w LV Write Access read/write LV Status available # open 1 LV Size 500.00 GiB Current LE 128000 Segments 1 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 256 Block device 253:1
--- Segments ---
Logical extent 0 to 127999:
Type striped
Stripes 5
Stripe size 4.00 KiB
Stripe 0:
Physical volume /dev/sdb
Physical extents 5120 to 30719
Stripe 1:
Physical volume /dev/sdc
Physical extents 5120 to 30719
Stripe 2:
Physical volume /dev/sdd
Physical extents 5120 to 30719
Stripe 3:
Physical volume /dev/sde
Physical extents 5120 to 30719
Stripe 4:
Physical volume /dev/sdf
Physical extents 5120 to 30719The KVM command line is as follows:
$ tr '\0' '\n' < /proc/9409/cmdline /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -S -M rhel6.0.0 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -name guest -uuid e2bf97e0-cfb7-444c-abc3-9efe262d8efe -nodefconfig -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=monitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/guest.monitor,server,nowait -mon chardev=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -boot c -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/cdrom.iso,if=none,media=cdrom,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,format=raw -device ide-drive,bus=ide.1,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-1-0,id=ide0-1-0 -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/guest.qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,boot=on,format=qcow2 -device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0 -drive file=/dev/datavol/disk1,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk1,format=raw -device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6,drive=drive-virtio-disk1,id=virtio-disk1 -netdev tap,fd=23,id=hostnet0 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:ec:8d:47,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3 -chardev pty,id=serial0 -device isa-serial,chardev=serial0 -usb -vnc 127.0.0.1:2 -vga cirrus -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5
That is started from virt-manager given the following configuration:
<domain type='kvm' id='18'>
<name>guest</name> <uuid>e2bf97e0-cfb7-444c-abc3-9efe262d8efe</uuid> <memory>1048576</memory> <currentMemory>1048576</currentMemory> <vcpu>1</vcpu>
<os>
<type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.0.0'>hvm</type>
<boot dev='hd'/>
</os>
<features>
<acpi/>
<apic/>
<pae/>
</features>
<clock offset='utc'/>
<on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff>
<on_reboot>restart</on_reboot>
<on_crash>restart</on_crash>
<devices>
<emulator>/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm</emulator>
<disk type='file' device='cdrom'>
<driver name='qemu' type='raw'/>
<source file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/cdrom.iso'/>
<target dev='hdc' bus='ide'/>
<readonly/>
<alias name='ide0-1-0'/>
<address type='drive' controller='0' bus='1' unit='0'/>
</disk>
<disk type='file' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/>
<source file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/guest.qcow2'/>
<target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/>
<alias name='virtio-disk0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/>
</disk>
<disk type='block' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='raw'/>
<source dev='/dev/datavol/disk1'/>
<target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/>
<alias name='virtio-disk1'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x0'/>
</disk>
<controller type='ide' index='0'>
<alias name='ide0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x1'/>
</controller>
<interface type='network'>
<mac address='52:54:00:ec:8d:47'/>
<source network='default'/>
<target dev='vnet2'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<alias name='net0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
</interface>
<serial type='pty'>
<source path='/dev/pts/3'/>
<target port='0'/>
<alias name='serial0'/>
</serial>
<console type='pty' tty='/dev/pts/3'>
<source path='/dev/pts/3'/>
<target port='0'/>
<alias name='serial0'/>
</console>
<input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/>
<graphics type='vnc' port='5902' autoport='yes'/>
<video>
<model type='cirrus' vram='9216' heads='1'/>
<alias name='video0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/>
</video>
<memballoon model='virtio'>
<alias name='balloon0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/>
</memballoon> </devices>
</domain>
Any ideas why the huge performance difference?
Cheers,
b.
Quoted 12 lines · Brian J. Murrell
I have a CentOS 6 host system running a CentOS 6 KVM guest and the guest seems to get about 5x slower disk throughput than the host:
host $ sudo dd of=/dev/datavol/disk1 if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=50000 50000+0 records in
50000+0 records out
52428800000 bytes (52 GB) copied, 150.36 s, 349 MB/s
host $ ssh guest dd of=/dev/vdb if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=50000 50000+0 records in
50000+0 records out
52428800000 bytes (52 GB) copied, 731.007 s, 71.7 MB/s
Quoted 3 lines
This is actually a vast improvement over earlier tests where it was a factor of 40x difference. But even still, I thought virtio disks were supposed to be much closer to native host speed than 5x.
--- snip ---
Did you try to set the cache of the virtio disk to "none"?
Regards,
Stefan
Quoted 2 lines · Stefan Pietsch
Did you try to set the cache of the virtio disk to "none"?
I didn't. It was set at "default" in virt-manager and I suppose I just assumed that "default" would be reasonable.
Changing to "none" has had a good effect indeed:
host $ ssh guest dd of=/dev/vdb if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=10000 10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 49.9241 s, 210 MB/s
host $ ssh guest dd of=/dev/vdb if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=10000 10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 54.7737 s, 191 MB/s
host $ ssh guest dd of=/dev/vdb if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=10000 10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 50.9851 s, 206 MB/s
host $ sudo dd of=/dev/datavol/disk1 if=/dev/zero bs=1M oflag=direct count=10000 10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 31.0545 s, 338 MB/s
So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about normal or should I be looking for more?
Thanks much!
b.
Quoted 2 lines · Brian J. Murrell
So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about normal or should I be looking for more?
aio=native
Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure where libvirt hides that.
Signature · 1 line
Sasha.
Quoted 7 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 2 lines · Brian J. Murrell
So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about normal or should I be looking for more?
aio=native
Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure where libvirt hides that.
<disk ...>
<driver io='threads|native'/>
...</disk>
Regards,
Daniel
Signature · 4 lines
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
Quoted 5 lines · Daniel P. Berrange
Quoted 4 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 2 lines · Brian J. Murrell
So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about normal or should I be looking for more?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
aio=native
Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure where libvirt hides that.
<disk ...>
<driver io='threads|native'/> ...</disk>
When I try to "virsh edit" and add that "<driver io=.../>" it seems to get stripped out of the config (as observed with "virsh dumpxml"). Doing some googling I discovered an alternate syntax (in message
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2011-June/msg00004.html):
<driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none' io='native'/>
But the "io='native'" seems to get stripped out of that too.
FWIW, I have:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.113.el6.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.8.1-27.el6.x86_64
installed here on CentOS 6.0. Maybe this aio= is not supported in the above package(s)?
Cheers,
b.
----- Message from "Brian J. Murrell" <[email protected]> ---------
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:43:23 -0500
From: "Brian J. Murrell" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 5x slower guest disk performance with virtio disk
To: [email protected]
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Quoted 24 lines · Daniel P. Berrange
Quoted 5 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 4 lines · Brian J. Murrell
Quoted 2 lines
So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about normal or should I be looking for more?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
aio=native
Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure where libvirt hides that.
<disk ...>
<driver io='threads|native'/> ...</disk>
When I try to "virsh edit" and add that "<driver io=.../>" it seems to get stripped out of the config (as observed with "virsh dumpxml"). Doing some googling I discovered an alternate syntax (in message
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2011-June/msg00004.html):<driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none' io='native'/>
But the "io='native'" seems to get stripped out of that too.
Quoted 8 lines
FWIW, I have:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.113.el6.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.8.1-27.el6.x86_64installed here on CentOS 6.0. Maybe this aio= is not supported in the above package(s)?
You need to update CentOS, your version of libvirt does not support io=native I don't believe. You are running into similar issues that I have posted about (mostly unsuccessfully in terms of getting much support LOL) here - https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33708&forum=55
From that thread:
With libvirt 0.8.7-6, qemu-kvm 0.12.1.2-2.144, and kernel 2.6.32-115, you can use the "io=native" parameter in the KVM xml files. Bugzilla 591703 has the details, but basically my img file references in the VM xml now reads like this:
<disk type='file' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none' io='native'/>
<source file='/vm/pool/server06.img'/>
<target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04'
function='0x0'/>
</disk>You may also want to search this list for my thread from November with the title "Improving RAID5 write performance in a KVM VM"
Cheers
Simon.