block: fix ioc leak in put_io_context
PATCH 1/1 block: fix ioc leak in put_io_context
When put_io_context is called, if ioc->icq_list is empty and refcount is 1, kernel will not free the ioc.
This is caught by following kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0xffff880036349fe0 (size 216):
comm "sh", pid 2137, jiffies 4294931140 (age 290579.412s) hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
01 00 01 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8169f926>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50
[<ffffffff81195a9c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1cc/0x2a0
[<ffffffff81356b67>] create_io_context_slowpath+0x27/0x130
[<ffffffff81356d2b>] get_task_io_context+0xbb/0xf0
[<ffffffff81055f0e>] copy_process+0x188e/0x18b0
[<ffffffff8105609b>] do_fork+0x11b/0x420
[<ffffffff810247f8>] sys_clone+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffff816d3373>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffffioc->release_work() should be used even if ioc->icq_list is empty.
--- block/blk-ioc.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
block/blk-ioc.c +1 -2
@@ -157,8 +157,7 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)*/ if (atomic_long_dec_and_test (&ioc->refcount)) {spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags); -if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list)) -schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); +schedule_work (&ioc->release_work);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags); } }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
Quoted 35 lines · Xiaotian Feng
When
put_io_contextis called, ifioc->icq_listis empty and refcount is 1, kernel will not free the ioc.This is caught by following kmemleak:
unreferenced object
0xffff880036349fe0(size 216):
comm "sh", pid 2137, jiffies 4294931140 (age 290579.412s) hex dump (first 32 bytes):00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 01 00 01 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N.......... backtrace: [<ffffffff8169f926>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff81195a9c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1cc/0x2a0 [<ffffffff81356b67>] create_io_context_slowpath+0x27/0x130 [<ffffffff81356d2b>] get_task_io_context+0xbb/0xf0 [<ffffffff81055f0e>] copy_process+0x188e/0x18b0 [<ffffffff8105609b>] do_fork+0x11b/0x420 [<ffffffff810247f8>] sys_clone+0x28/0x30 [<ffffffff816d3373>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
ioc->release_work()should be used even ifioc->icq_listis empty.Signed-off-by Xiaotian Feng <[email protected]>Cc Tejun Heo <[email protected]>Cc Jens Axboe <[email protected]>--- block/blk-ioc.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)block/blk-ioc.c +0
-0
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 161
Quoted 7 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +1
-2@@ -157,8 +157,7 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)*/ if (atomic_long_dec_and_test (&ioc->refcount)) {spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags); -if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list)) -schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); +schedule_work (&ioc->release_work);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags);
May be free the ioc right here instead of invoking release_work().
Thanks
Vivek
PATCH v2 1/1 block: fix ioc leak in put_io_context
When put_io_context is called, if ioc->icq_list is empty and refcount
is 1, kernel will not free the ioc.
This is caught by following kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0xffff880036349fe0 (size 216):
comm "sh", pid 2137, jiffies 4294931140 (age 290579.412s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
01 00 01 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8169f926>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50
[<ffffffff81195a9c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1cc/0x2a0
[<ffffffff81356b67>] create_io_context_slowpath+0x27/0x130
[<ffffffff81356d2b>] get_task_io_context+0xbb/0xf0
[<ffffffff81055f0e>] copy_process+0x188e/0x18b0
[<ffffffff8105609b>] do_fork+0x11b/0x420
[<ffffffff810247f8>] sys_clone+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffff816d3373>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
ioc should be freed if ioc->icq_list is empty.--- block/blk-ioc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
block/blk-ioc.c +6 -0
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)void put_io_context (struct io_context *ioc) {unsigned long flags; +bool free_ioc = false;if (ioc ==NULL )return ;
@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags);if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list))schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); +else + free_ioc = true;spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags); } + +if (free_ioc) +kmem_cache_free (iocontext_cachep, ioc); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (put_io_context);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.5.4
Quoted 42 lines · Xiaotian Feng
When put_io_context is called, if ioc->icq_list is empty and refcount is 1, kernel will not free the ioc. This is caught by following kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff880036349fe0 (size 216): comm "sh", pid 2137, jiffies 4294931140 (age 290579.412s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 01 00 01 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N.......... backtrace: [<ffffffff8169f926>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff81195a9c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1cc/0x2a0 [<ffffffff81356b67>] create_io_context_slowpath+0x27/0x130 [<ffffffff81356d2b>] get_task_io_context+0xbb/0xf0 [<ffffffff81055f0e>] copy_process+0x188e/0x18b0 [<ffffffff8105609b>] do_fork+0x11b/0x420 [<ffffffff810247f8>] sys_clone+0x28/0x30 [<ffffffff816d3373>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff ioc should be freed if ioc->icq_list is empty.Signed-off-by Xiaotian Feng <[email protected]>--- block/blk-ioc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)block/blk-ioc.c +1
-0@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)void put_io_context (struct io_context *ioc) {unsigned long flags; +bool free_ioc = false;if (ioc ==NULL )return ;@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags);if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list))
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 171
Quoted 10 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +5
-0schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); + else + free_ioc = true;spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags); } + +if (free_ioc) +kmem_cache_free (iocontext_cachep, ioc); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (put_io_context);
This one looks good to me. Tejun?
Vivek
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 47 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 46 lines · Xiaotian Feng
When put_io_context is called, if ioc->icq_list is empty and refcount is 1, kernel will not free the ioc. This is caught by following kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff880036349fe0 (size 216): comm "sh", pid 2137, jiffies 4294931140 (age 290579.412s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 01 00 01 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N.......... backtrace: [<ffffffff8169f926>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff81195a9c>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1cc/0x2a0 [<ffffffff81356b67>] create_io_context_slowpath+0x27/0x130 [<ffffffff81356d2b>] get_task_io_context+0xbb/0xf0 [<ffffffff81055f0e>] copy_process+0x188e/0x18b0 [<ffffffff8105609b>] do_fork+0x11b/0x420 [<ffffffff810247f8>] sys_clone+0x28/0x30 [<ffffffff816d3373>] stub_clone+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff ioc should be freed if ioc->icq_list is empty.Signed-off-by Xiaotian Feng <[email protected]>--- block/blk-ioc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)block/blk-ioc.c +3
-0@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)void put_io_context (struct io_context *ioc) {unsigned long flags; +bool free_ioc = false;if (ioc ==NULL )return ;@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags);if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list))schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); +else + free_ioc = true;spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags);
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 171
Quoted 6 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +3
-0} + +if (free_ioc) +kmem_cache_free (iocontext_cachep, ioc); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (put_io_context);This one looks good to me. Tejun?
It's definitely a leak. I have applied it.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Tejun Heo
Acked-byQuoted 11 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 10 lines · Xiaotian Feng
block/blk-ioc.c +1
-0@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work)void put_io_context (struct io_context *ioc) {unsigned long flags; +bool free_ioc = false;
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 164
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +2
-0if (ioc ==NULL )return ;@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc)spin_lock_irqsave (&ioc->lock, flags);if (!hlist_empty (&ioc->icq_list))schedule_work (&ioc->release_work); +else + free_ioc = true;
Calling kmem_cache_free() here directly is probably better.
Quoted 11 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 171
Quoted 7 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +3
-0spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ioc->lock, flags); } + +if (free_ioc) +kmem_cache_free (iocontext_cachep, ioc); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (put_io_context);This one looks good to me. Tejun?
Acked-by Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun
Quoted 12 lines · Tejun Heo
Quoted 11 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 10 lines · Xiaotian Feng
block/blk-ioc.c +1
-0@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work) void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) { unsigned long flags; + bool free_ioc = false;
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 164
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +2
-0if (ioc == NULL) return;@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->lock, flags); if (!hlist_empty(&ioc->icq_list)) schedule_work(&ioc->release_work); + else + free_ioc = true;Calling
kmem_cache_free()here directly is probably better.
I did this on my first try, but I got a kernel warning with the following spin_unlock on ioc->lock :(
We'll hit a use after free bug then...
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 9 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 171
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +3
-0spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags); } + + if (free_ioc) + kmem_cache_free(iocontext_cachep, ioc); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_io_context);Quoted 3 lines
This one looks good to me. Tejun?
Acked-by Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>Acked-by Tejun Heo <[email protected]>Thanks.
--
tejun
Quoted 24 lines · Xiaotian Feng
Quoted 12 lines · Tejun Heo
Quoted 11 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 10 lines · Xiaotian Feng
block/blk-ioc.c +1
-0@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_struct *work) void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) { unsigned long flags; + bool free_ioc = false;Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) · line 164
Quoted 8 lines
block/blk-ioc.c +2
-0if (ioc == NULL) return;@@ -159,8 +160,13 @@ void put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->lock, flags); if (!hlist_empty(&ioc->icq_list)) schedule_work(&ioc->release_work); + else + free_ioc = true;Calling
kmem_cache_free()here directly is probably better.
Quoted 3 lines
I did this on my first try, but I got a kernel warning with the following
spin_unlockonioc->lock:(
We'll hit a use after free bug then...
Ah, you're right. Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun