regulator: as3711: Fix valid min_uV/max_UV checking in as3711_bound_check
PATCH 1/2 regulator: as3711: Fix valid min_uV/max_UV checking in as3711_bound_check
Below cases are supposed to be valid:
min_uV == max_uV == info->max_uVmin_uV == max_uV == rdev->desc->min_uV
Don't return -EINVAL for above cases.
This patch also includes below cleanups:
- Use rdev_get_drvdata(rdev) instead of rdev->reg_data.
- Remove unnecessary WARN_ON, it looks pointless.
--- drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c +3 -6
@@ -69,17 +69,14 @@ static int as3711_list_voltage_dldo(struct regulator_dev *rdev,static int as3711_bound_check (struct regulator_dev *rdev,int *min_uV,int *max_uV) { -struct as3711_regulator_info *info =container_of (rdev->desc, - struct as3711_regulator_info, desc); -struct as3711_regulator *reg = rdev->reg_data; - -WARN_ON (reg->reg_info != info); +struct as3711_regulator *reg =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); +struct as3711_regulator_info *info = reg->reg_info;dev_dbg (&rdev->dev,"%s(), %d, %d, %d\n" , __func__, *min_uV, rdev->desc->min_uV, info->max_uV);if (*max_uV < *min_uV || - *min_uV >= info->max_uV || rdev->desc->min_uV >= *max_uV) + *min_uV > info->max_uV || rdev->desc->min_uV > *max_uV)return -EINVAL ;if (rdev->desc->n_voltages ==1 )
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 2/2 regulator: as3711: Fix the logic in as3711_sel_check
Below equation means the "voltage" is the "smallest" voltage within specific range.
ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min - bottom) / step;
voltage = ret * step + bottom;
If we do try 1 down when (voltage > max), new voltage is then less than min voltage. Which means the new voltage is not in the requested voltage range.
This patch also includes below cleanups:
- Use DIV_ROUND_UP
- rename variable 'ret' to 'sel' for better readability because as3711_sel_check returns the selector.
--- drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c | 23 ++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c +8 -15
@@ -93,24 +93,17 @@ static int as3711_bound_check(struct regulator_dev *rdev,static int as3711_sel_check (int min,int max,int bottom,int step) { -int ret, voltage; +int sel, voltage;/* Round up min, when dividing: keeps us within the range */ - ret = (min - bottom + step -1 ) / step; - voltage = ret * step + bottom; + sel =DIV_ROUND_UP (min - bottom, step); + voltage = sel * step + bottom;pr_debug ("%s(): select %d..%d in %d+N*%d: %d\n" , __func__, - min, max, bottom, step, ret); -if (voltage > max) { -/* -* Try 1 down. It will take us below min, but as long we stay -* above bottom, we're fine. -*/ - ret--; - voltage = ret * step + bottom; -if (voltage < bottom) -return -EINVAL ; - } -return ret; + min, max, bottom, step, sel); +if (voltage > max) +return -EINVAL ; + +return sel; } static int as3711_map_voltage_sd(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: as3711: Fix the logic in as3711_sel_check
Quoted 9 lines · Axel Lin
Below equation means the "voltage" is the "smallest" voltage within specific range.
ret =
DIV_ROUND_UP(min - bottom)/ step;
voltage = ret * step + bottom;If we do try 1 down when (voltage > max), new voltage is then less than min voltage. Which means the new voltage is not in the requested voltage range.
Quoted 6 lines
This patch also includes below cleanups:
- UseDIV_ROUND_UP
- rename variable 'ret' to 'sel' for better readability becauseas3711_sel_checkreturns the selector.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Thanks
Guennadi
Quoted 46 lines
--- drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c | 23 ++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c +8
-15@@ -93,24 +93,17 @@ static int as3711_bound_check(struct regulator_dev *rdev,static int as3711_sel_check (int min,int max,int bottom,int step) { -int ret, voltage; +int sel, voltage;/* Round up min, when dividing: keeps us within the range */ - ret = (min - bottom + step -1 ) / step; - voltage = ret * step + bottom; + sel =DIV_ROUND_UP (min - bottom, step); + voltage = sel * step + bottom;pr_debug ("%s(): select %d..%d in %d+N*%d: %d\n" , __func__, - min, max, bottom, step, ret); -if (voltage > max) { -/* -* Try 1 down. It will take us below min, but as long we stay -* above bottom, we're fine. -*/ - ret--; - voltage = ret * step + bottom; -if (voltage < bottom) -return -EINVAL ; - } -return ret; + min, max, bottom, step, sel); +if (voltage > max) +return -EINVAL ; + +return sel; } static int as3711_map_voltage_sd(struct regulator_dev *rdev,Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
Quoted 5 lines · Axel Lin
Below cases are supposed to be valid:
min_uV==max_uV==info->max_uVmin_uV==max_uV==rdev->desc->min_uV
Quoted 7 lines
Don't return
-EINVALfor above cases.This patch also includes below cleanups:
- Userdev_get_drvdata(rdev)instead ofrdev->reg_data.
- Remove unnecessaryWARN_ON, it looks pointless.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Thanks
Guennadi
Quoted 34 lines
--- drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)drivers/regulator/as3711-regulator.c +3
-6@@ -69,17 +69,14 @@ static int as3711_list_voltage_dldo(struct regulator_dev *rdev,static int as3711_bound_check (struct regulator_dev *rdev,int *min_uV,int *max_uV) { -struct as3711_regulator_info *info =container_of (rdev->desc, - struct as3711_regulator_info, desc); -struct as3711_regulator *reg = rdev->reg_data; - -WARN_ON (reg->reg_info != info); +struct as3711_regulator *reg =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); +struct as3711_regulator_info *info = reg->reg_info;dev_dbg (&rdev->dev,"%s(), %d, %d, %d\n" , __func__, *min_uV, rdev->desc->min_uV, info->max_uV);if (*max_uV < *min_uV || - *min_uV >= info->max_uV || rdev->desc->min_uV >= *max_uV) + *min_uV > info->max_uV || rdev->desc->min_uV > *max_uV)return -EINVAL ;if (rdev->desc->n_voltages ==1 )Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
Mark Brown
AppliedQuoted 4 lines · Axel Lin
Below cases are supposed to be valid:
min_uV==max_uV==info->max_uVmin_uV==max_uV==rdev->desc->min_uV
Applied both, thanks.