Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mfd: wm5102: Treat future revisions as revision B

PATCH In review Mark Brown 2 participants 3 messages Nov 29, 2012 – Dec 1, 2012

Subsystems (2)
Multifunction devices (MFD) Wolfson microelectronics drivers
lore
Share & tools
lore

Mark Brown

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mfd: wm5102: Treat future revisions as revision B

The expectation is that future revisions will behave as revision B.

Signed-off-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c +1 -3
index 447b00b..b82a003 100644
@@ -76,12 +76,10 @@ int wm5102_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 		return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
 					     wm5102_reva_patch,
 					     ARRAY_SIZE(wm5102_reva_patch));
-	case 1:
+	default:
 		return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
 					     wm5102_revb_patch,
 					     ARRAY_SIZE(wm5102_revb_patch));
-	default:
-		return 0;
 	}
 }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw

Hi Mark,

Quoted 6 lines · Mark Brown

The expectation is that future revisions will behave as revision B.

Signed-off-by Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mfd/wm5102-tables.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

This one does not apply. I'm missing a patch that would register the revision B patch.

Cheers,
Samuel.

Signature · 2 lines
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Samuel Ortiz

This one does not apply. I'm missing a patch that would register the revision B patch.

I'm pretty sure I sent it out... I think there's a few patches went AWOL a couple of weeks ago. Anyway, will resend.