dw_dmac: backlink to dw_dma in dw_dma_chan is superfluous
PATCH v2 1/2 dw_dmac: backlink to dw_dma in dw_dma_chan is superfluous
The same information could be exctracted from the struct dma_chan. The patch introduces helper function dwc_get_data_width() as well.
--- drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- drivers/dma/dw_dmac_regs.h | 3 --- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c +12 -7
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ static inline unsigned int dwc_get_sms(struct dw_dma_slave *slave)*/ #define NR_DESCS_PER_CHANNEL 64 +static inline unsigned int dwc_get_data_width (struct dma_chan *chan,bool d) +{ +struct dw_dma *dw =to_dw_dma (chan->device); +struct dw_dma_slave *dws = chan->private; + +return dw->data_width[d ?dwc_get_dms (dws) :dwc_get_sms (dws)]; +} +/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /*
@@ -703,7 +711,6 @@ dwc_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src, size_t len, unsigned long flags) {struct dw_dma_chan *dwc =to_dw_dma_chan (chan); -struct dw_dma_slave *dws = chan->private;struct dw_desc *desc;struct dw_desc *first;struct dw_desc *prev;
@@ -726,8 +733,8 @@ dwc_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src, dwc->direction =DMA_MEM_TO_MEM ; - data_width = min_t(unsigned int, dwc->dw->data_width[dwc_get_sms(dws)], - dwc->dw->data_width[dwc_get_dms (dws)]); + data_width = min_t(unsigned int, dwc_get_data_width(chan, true), +dwc_get_data_width (chan, false)); src_width = dst_width = min_t(unsigned int, data_width,dwc_fast_fls (src | dest | len));
@@ -792,7 +799,6 @@ dwc_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned long flags, void *context) { struct dw_dma_chan *dwc = to_dw_dma_chan(chan); -struct dw_dma_slave *dws = chan->private;struct dma_slave_config *sconfig = &dwc->dma_sconfig;struct dw_desc *prev;struct dw_desc *first;
@@ -826,7 +832,7 @@ dwc_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl, ctllo |= sconfig->device_fc ?DWC_CTLL_FC (DW_DMA_FC_P_M2P ) :DWC_CTLL_FC (DW_DMA_FC_D_M2P ); - data_width = dwc->dw->data_width[dwc_get_sms (dws)]; + data_width =dwc_get_data_width (chan, false);for_each_sg (sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {struct dw_desc *desc;
@@ -889,7 +895,7 @@ slave_sg_todev_fill_desc: ctllo |= sconfig->device_fc ?DWC_CTLL_FC (DW_DMA_FC_P_P2M ) :DWC_CTLL_FC (DW_DMA_FC_D_P2M ); - data_width = dwc->dw->data_width[dwc_get_dms (dws)]; + data_width =dwc_get_data_width (chan, true);for_each_sg (sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {struct dw_desc *desc;
@@ -1720,7 +1726,6 @@ static int dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)channel_clear_bit (dw,CH_EN , dwc->mask); - dwc->dw = dw; dwc->direction =DMA_TRANS_NONE ;/* hardware configuration */
drivers/dma/dw_dmac_regs.h +0 -3
@@ -214,9 +214,6 @@ struct dw_dma_chan {/* configuration passed via DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG */ struct dma_slave_config dma_sconfig; - -/* backlink to dw_dma */ -struct dw_dma *dw; }; static inline struct dw_dma_chan_regs __iomem *
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 2/2 dw_dmac: check for mapping errors
Otherwise we get a warning in case of CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG=y
[ 45.775943] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x5d6/0x6ac() [ 45.782369] dw_dmac dw_dmac.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check map error[device address=0x00000000356efcc0] [size=28 bytes] [mapped as single]
--- drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c +14 -6
@@ -1099,6 +1099,7 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)struct dw_desc *desc;int i;unsigned long flags; +int ret;dev_vdbg (chan2dev (chan),"%s\n" , __func__);
@@ -1122,12 +1123,8 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dwc->lock, flags); desc =kzalloc (sizeof (struct dw_desc ),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!desc) { -dev_info (chan2dev (chan), -"only allocated %d descriptors\n" , i); -spin_lock_irqsave (&dwc->lock, flags); -break ; - } +if (!desc) + goto err_desc_alloc;INIT_LIST_HEAD (&desc->tx_list);dma_async_tx_descriptor_init (&desc->txd, chan);
@@ -1135,6 +1132,10 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan) desc->txd.flags =DMA_CTRL_ACK ; desc->txd.phys =dma_map_single (chan2parent (chan), &desc->lli,sizeof (desc->lli),DMA_TO_DEVICE ); + ret =dma_mapping_error (chan2parent (chan), desc->txd.phys); +if (ret) + goto err_desc_alloc; +dwc_desc_put (dwc, desc);spin_lock_irqsave (&dwc->lock, flags);
@@ -1146,6 +1147,13 @@ static int dwc_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)dev_dbg (chan2dev (chan),"%s: allocated %d descriptors\n" , __func__, i);return i; + +err_desc_alloc: +kfree (desc); + +dev_info (chan2dev (chan),"only allocated %d descriptors\n" , i); + +return i; }static void dwc_free_chan_resources (struct dma_chan *chan)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] dw_dmac: check for mapping errors
Quoted 6 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Otherwise we get a warning in case of
CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG=y[ 45.775943] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x5d6/0x6ac() [ 45.782369] dw_dmac dw_dmac.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check map error[device address=0x00000000356efcc0] [size=28 bytes] [mapped as single]Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 14 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The same information could be exctracted from the struct
dma_chan. The patch introduces helper functiondwc_get_data_width()as well.Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- drivers/dma/dw_dmac_regs.h | 3 --- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c +0
-0
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c static inline unsigned int dwc_get_sms(struct dw_dma_slave *slave) · line 82
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c +7
-0@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ static inline unsigned int dwc_get_sms(struct dw_dma_slave *slave)*/ #define NR_DESCS_PER_CHANNEL 64 +static inline unsigned int dwc_get_data_width (struct dma_chan *chan,bool d) +{ +struct dw_dma *dw =to_dw_dma (chan->device); +struct dw_dma_slave *dws = chan->private; + +return dw->data_width[d ?dwc_get_dms (dws) :dwc_get_sms (dws)]; +}
I am so sorry to ask for V3 for this patch, but i didn't like the bool d at all. Logically the variable name is not good enough in describing its purpose.
What i would have done here is:
#define SRC_MASTER 0
#define DST_MASTER 1
And used them here. :)
Rest is fine.