sdl_ttf: bump to version 2.0.11

---
 package/sdl_ttf/sdl_ttf.mk |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

index b9747d8..e9bc537 100644
@@ -3,9 +3,12 @@
 # SDL_ttf
 #
 #############################################################
-SDL_TTF_VERSION:=2.0.9
-SDL_TTF_SOURCE:=SDL_ttf-$(SDL_TTF_VERSION).tar.gz
-SDL_TTF_SITE:=http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_ttf/release/
+
+SDL_TTF_VERSION = 2.0.11
+SDL_TTF_SOURCE = SDL_ttf-$(SDL_TTF_VERSION).tar.gz
+SDL_TTF_SITE = http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_ttf/release/
+SDL_TTF_LICENSE = zlib
+SDL_TTF_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
 
 SDL_TTF_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 SDL_TTF_DEPENDENCIES = sdl freetype

1.7.4.1

---
 package/sdl_mixer/sdl_mixer.mk |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

index 411b65d..a062c35 100644
@@ -3,9 +3,12 @@
 # SDL_mixer
 #
 #############################################################
-SDL_MIXER_VERSION:=1.2.11
-SDL_MIXER_SOURCE:=SDL_mixer-$(SDL_MIXER_VERSION).tar.gz
-SDL_MIXER_SITE:=http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/
+
+SDL_MIXER_VERSION = 1.2.12
+SDL_MIXER_SOURCE = SDL_mixer-$(SDL_MIXER_VERSION).tar.gz
+SDL_MIXER_SITE = http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/release/
+SDL_MIXER_LICENSE = zlib
+SDL_MIXER_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
 
 SDL_MIXER_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 SDL_MIXER_DEPENDENCIES = sdl

1.7.4.1

Gilles> Signed-off-by: Gilles Talis <[email protected]>

Committed, thanks.

Bye, Peter Korsgaard

---
 package/sdl_gfx/sdl_gfx.mk |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

index c1c7f91..440e7ea 100644
@@ -3,9 +3,12 @@
 # SDL_gfx addon for SDL
 #
 #############################################################
-SDL_GFX_VERSION = 2.0.19
+
+SDL_GFX_VERSION = 2.0.24
 SDL_GFX_SOURCE = SDL_gfx-$(SDL_GFX_VERSION).tar.gz
 SDL_GFX_SITE = http://www.ferzkopp.net/Software/SDL_gfx-2.0/
+SDL_GFX_LICENSE = zlib
+SDL_GFX_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING LICENSE
 SDL_GFX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 SDL_GFX_DEPENDENCIES = sdl
 SDL_GFX_CONF_OPT = \

1.7.4.1

Gilles> Signed-off-by: Gilles Talis <[email protected]>

I'm having problems building 2.0.24, as it ends up trying to run aclocal during the build step:

PATH="/home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/host/bin:/home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/host/usr/bin:/home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/host/usr/sbin/:/home/peko/bin:/home/peko/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/opt/barco/current/usr/bin:/opt/barco/current/usr/bin" PERLLIB="/home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/host/usr/lib/perl" /usr/bin/make -j8 -C /home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/build/sdl_gfx-2.0.24/ CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/bash
/home/peko/source/buildroot/testsdl/build/sdl_gfx-2.0.24/missing --run
aclocal-1.11 -I m4

I haven't figured out why yet. 2.0.23 builds fine and I don't see any significant changes to the build system between 23 and 24 (besides that aclocal.m4 has been generated by a newer aclocal version).

So I've changed it to use 2.0.23 for now instead.

Bye, Peter Korsgaard

finally found some time to look into this.
The issue comes from the fact that even though aclocal.m4 and configure.inare identical across 2.0.23 and 2.0.24, configure.in timestamp has changed, making it newer than aclocal.m4. This leads "make" to try and re-generate aclocal.m4.
I am not expert enough in aclocal and m4 to fix the missing variables issue. The only quick & dirty workaround I have found is to change configure.in file timestamp to what it was in 2.0.23 (touch -t .....).

Would it be an acceptable patch to bump sdl_gfx to 2.0.24?

thanks
Gilles.

2013/1/19 Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20130124/ee856b0d/attachment-0001.html>

Gilles> finally found some time to look into this.

Gilles> The issue comes from the fact that even though aclocal.m4 and Gilles> configure.in are identical across 2.0.23 and 2.0.24, Gilles> ?configure.in timestamp has changed, making it newer than Gilles> aclocal.m4. This leads "make" to try and re-generate Gilles> aclocal.m4. I am not expert enough in aclocal and m4 to fix Gilles> the missing variables issue. The only quick & dirty workaround Gilles> I have found is to change configure.in file timestamp to what Gilles> it was in 2.0.23 (touch -t .....).

Gilles> Would it be an acceptable patch to bump sdl_gfx to 2.0.24?

Is there any strong reason to go for 2.0.24 over 23? Perhaps you could bring it up with sdl_gfx and get them to do a 2.0.25 release with aclocal.m4 regenerated?

Bye, Peter Korsgaard

Gilles> Signed-off-by: Gilles Talis <[email protected]>

Committed, thanks.

Bye, Peter Korsgaard