Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
Subsystems (10)
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
The enable regulator needs to be mandatory because there was no good way to determine the difference between opting out of the regulator, and probe deferral.
This series of patches is intended to add a dummy regulator (or a GPIO regulator) for all users of the pwm-backlight.
The last patch in the series will always be the pwm-backlight change to add this mandatory regulator. Patches following up to that patch add the mandatory regulator on a per mach family basis. Once all users of pwm-backlight have been patched, this series can be applied in order to maintain bisectability.
All I did in every case was to provide a dummy fixed regulator to pwm-backlight. If your platform actually uses a regulator (or a GPIO) to enable the backlight, please either let me know so that I can make the modifications and give you something back to test. Or (better yet), provide me with a tested, alternate patch that I can fold into this patch series.
I made sure that where there was a defconfig for an affected board, that it builds. I did not test-build the unicore patch.
V3 and earlier versions of this series only had the OMAP patch, which I used for ironing out some early, obvious stuff. V4 and later is the complete patch set.
Andrew Chew (9):
ARM: OMAP: board-4430sdp: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: S3C24XX: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: pxa: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: EXYNOS: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
unicore32: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: vt8500: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: tegra: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
pwm_bl: Add mandatory backlight enable regulator
.../bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt | 14 +++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x300.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri-pxa270-income.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c | 13 ++++- arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palm27x.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmtc.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmte2.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/tavorevb.c | 11 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/z2.c | 10 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/zylonite.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c | 9 ++++ arch/unicore32/kernel/puv3-nb0916.c | 9 ++++ drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++---- 32 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 1/9 ARM: OMAP: board-4430sdp: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c +6 -0
@@ -291,6 +291,10 @@ static struct platform_device sdp4430_leds_pwm = { }, }; +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data sdp4430_backlight_data = { .max_brightness =127 , .dft_brightness =127 ,
@@ -718,6 +722,8 @@ static void __init omap_4430sdp_init(void)omap4_i2c_init ();omap_sfh7741prox_init (); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_add_devices (sdp4430_devices,ARRAY_SIZE (sdp4430_devices));omap_serial_init ();omap_sdrc_init (NULL ,NULL );
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 2/9 ARM: S3C24XX: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c +8 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@#include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/input.h> #include <linux/gpio_keys.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/leds.h>
@@ -497,6 +499,9 @@ static void h1940_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_set_value (H1940_LATCH_MAX1698_nSHUTDOWN,0 ); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" );static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 ,
@@ -720,6 +725,9 @@ static void __init h1940_init(void)gpio_request (H1940_LATCH_SD_POWER ,"SD power" );gpio_direction_output (H1940_LATCH_SD_POWER ,0 ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (h1940_devices,ARRAY_SIZE (h1940_devices));gpio_request (S3C2410_GPA (1 ),"Red LED blink" );
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c +9 -0
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@#include <linux/gpio_keys.h> #include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/pda_power.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/pwm.h> #include <linux/s3c_adc_battery.h>
@@ -518,6 +520,10 @@ static int rx1950_backlight_notify(struct device *dev, int brightness)return brightness; } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data rx1950_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =24 ,
@@ -795,6 +801,9 @@ static void __init rx1950_init_machine(void)gpio_direction_output (S3C2410_GPA (4 ),0 );gpio_direction_output (S3C2410_GPJ (6 ),0 ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (rx1950_devices,ARRAY_SIZE (rx1950_devices)); i2c_register_board_info(0, rx1950_i2c_devices,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 3/9 ARM: pxa: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x300.c | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri-pxa270-income.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palm27x.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmtc.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmte2.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/tavorevb.c | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 8 ++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/z2.c | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/zylonite.c | 7 +++++++ 17 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x300.c +7 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@#include <linux/mfd/da903x.h> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/power_supply.h> #include <linux/apm-emulation.h>
@@ -305,6 +306,10 @@ static inline void cm_x300_init_lcd(void) {}#endif #if defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM ) || defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM_MODULE ) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data cm_x300_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =2 , .max_brightness = 100,
@@ -322,6 +327,8 @@ static struct platform_device cm_x300_backlight_device = {static void cm_x300_init_bl (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&cm_x300_backlight_device); }#else
arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri-pxa270-income.c +8 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@#include <linux/ioport.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -184,6 +186,10 @@ static inline void income_lcd_init(void) {}* Backlight ******************************************************************************/ #if defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM ) || defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM_MODULE ) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data income_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness = 0x3ff,
@@ -201,6 +207,8 @@ static struct platform_device income_backlight = {static void __init income_pwm_init (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&income_backlight); }#else
arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c +9 -0
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@#include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/input.h> #include <linux/gpio.h>
@@ -49,6 +51,10 @@#define GPIO19_GEN1_CAM_RST 19#define GPIO28_GEN2_CAM_RST 28 +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data ezx_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =1023 ,
@@ -792,6 +798,9 @@ static void __init a780_init(void)platform_device_register (&a780_camera); } +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (ARRAY_AND_SIZE (ezx_devices));platform_add_devices (ARRAY_AND_SIZE (a780_devices)); }
arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c +8 -0
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@#include <linux/regulator/driver.h> #include <linux/regulator/gpio-regulator.h> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/regulator/max1586.h> #include <linux/spi/ads7846.h> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
@@ -556,6 +557,10 @@ static struct platform_device hx4700_lcd = {* Backlight */ +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data backlight_data = { .pwm_id =-1 ,/* Superseded by pwm_lookup */ .max_brightness =200 ,
@@ -876,6 +881,9 @@ static void __init hx4700_init(void)pxa_set_btuart_info (NULL );pxa_set_stuart_info (NULL ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (devices,ARRAY_SIZE (devices));pwm_add_table (hx4700_pwm_lookup,ARRAY_SIZE (hx4700_pwm_lookup));
arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c +9 -0
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@#include <linux/ioport.h> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h> #include <linux/mtd/partitions.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <asm/types.h>
@@ -264,6 +266,10 @@ static struct platform_device lpd270_flash_device[2] = { }, }; +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data lpd270_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =1 ,
@@ -466,6 +472,9 @@ static void __init lpd270_init(void)*/ ARB_CNTRL =ARB_CORE_PARK |0x234 ; +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (platform_devices,ARRAY_SIZE (platform_devices));pxa_set_ac97_info (NULL );
arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c +8 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@#include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/regulator/driver.h> #include <linux/regulator/gpio-regulator.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h> #include <linux/usb/gpio_vbus.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -373,6 +374,10 @@ static void magician_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free_array (ARRAY_AND_SIZE (magician_bl_gpios)); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =272 ,
@@ -742,6 +747,9 @@ static void __init magician_init(void)pxa_set_btuart_info (NULL );pxa_set_stuart_info (NULL ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (ARRAY_AND_SIZE (devices));pxa_set_ficp_info (&magician_ficp_info);
arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c +12 -1
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h> #include <linux/input.h> #include <linux/gpio_keys.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/smc91x.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -333,6 +335,10 @@ static struct platform_device mst_flash_device[2] = { };#if defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA ) || defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA_MODULE ) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data mainstone_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness = 1023,
@@ -350,7 +356,12 @@ static struct platform_device mainstone_backlight_device = {static void __init mainstone_backlight_register (void ) { -int ret =platform_device_register (&mainstone_backlight_device); +int ret; + +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); + + ret =platform_device_register (&mainstone_backlight_device);if (ret)printk (KERN_ERR "mainstone: failed to register backlight device: %d\n" , ret); }
arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c +8 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@#include <linux/wm97xx.h> #include <linux/mtd/physmap.h> #include <linux/usb/gpio_vbus.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/regulator/max1586.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -179,6 +181,10 @@ static unsigned long mioa701_pin_config[] = { MFP_CFG_OUT(GPIO116, AF0, DRIVE_HIGH), }; +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +/* LCD Screen and Backlight */ static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data mioa701_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 ,
@@ -739,6 +745,8 @@ static void __init mioa701_machine_init(void)pxa_set_udc_info (&mioa701_udc_info);pxa_set_ac97_info (&mioa701_ac97_info); pm_power_off = mioa701_poweroff; +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_add_devices (devices,ARRAY_SIZE (devices));gsm_init ();
arch/arm/mach-pxa/palm27x.c +8 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@#include <linux/wm97xx.h> #include <linux/power_supply.h> #include <linux/usb/gpio_vbus.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/regulator/max1586.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h>
@@ -317,6 +319,10 @@ static void palm27x_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free (palm_lcd_power); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data palm27x_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =0xfe ,
@@ -339,6 +345,8 @@ void __init palm27x_pwm_init(int bl, int lcd) { palm_bl_power = bl; palm_lcd_power = lcd; +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&palm27x_backlight); }#endif
arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmtc.c +8 -0
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/input.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/input/matrix_keypad.h>
@@ -197,6 +199,10 @@ static void palmtc_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free (GPIO_NR_PALMTC_BL_POWER ); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data palmtc_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =1 , .max_brightness =PALMTC_MAX_INTENSITY ,
@@ -217,6 +223,8 @@ static struct platform_device palmtc_backlight = {static void __init palmtc_pwm_init (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&palmtc_backlight); }#else
arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmte2.c +9 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@#include <linux/gpio_keys.h> #include <linux/input.h> #include <linux/pda_power.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/wm97xx.h>
@@ -160,6 +162,10 @@ static void palmte2_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free_array (ARRAY_AND_SIZE (palmte_bl_gpios)); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data palmte2_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =PALMTE2_MAX_INTENSITY ,
@@ -354,6 +360,9 @@ static void __init palmte2_init(void)pxa_set_ac97_info (&palmte2_ac97_pdata);pxa_set_ficp_info (&palmte2_ficp_platform_data); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_add_devices (devices,ARRAY_SIZE (devices)); }
arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c +8 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <media/mt9v022.h>
@@ -148,6 +150,10 @@ static struct pxafb_mach_info pcm990_fbinfo __initdata = { };#endif +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data pcm990_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =1023 ,
@@ -539,6 +545,8 @@ void __init pcm990_baseboard_init(void)#ifndef CONFIG_PCM990_DISPLAY_NONE pxa_set_fb_info (NULL , &pcm990_fbinfo);#endif +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&pcm990_backlight_device);/* MMC */
arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c +6 -0
@@ -531,6 +531,10 @@ static void __init raumfeld_w1_init(void)* Framebuffer device */ +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +/* PWM controlled backlight */ static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data raumfeld_pwm_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 ,
@@ -617,6 +621,8 @@ static void __init raumfeld_lcd_init(void) }else {mfp_cfg_t raumfeld_pwm_pin_config =GPIO17_PWM0_OUT ;pxa3xx_mfp_config (&raumfeld_pwm_pin_config,1 ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_device_register (&raumfeld_pwm_backlight_device); }
arch/arm/mach-pxa/tavorevb.c +11 -0
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@#include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/smc91x.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
@@ -164,6 +166,12 @@ static inline void tavorevb_init_keypad(void) {}#endif /* CONFIG_KEYBOARD_PXA27x || CONFIG_KEYBOARD_PXA27x_MODULE */ #if defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA) || defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA_MODULE) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply[] = { + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("enable", "pwm-backlight.0"), + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("enable", "pwm-backlight.1"), +}; + static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data tavorevb_backlight_data[] = { [0] = { /* primary backlight */
@@ -464,6 +472,9 @@ static struct pxafb_mach_info tavorevb_lcd_info = {static void __init tavorevb_init_lcd (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + backlight_supply, +ARRAY_SIZE (backlight_supply),0 );platform_device_register (&tavorevb_backlight_devices[0 ]);platform_device_register (&tavorevb_backlight_devices[1 ]);pxa_set_fb_info (NULL , &tavorevb_lcd_info);
arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c +8 -0
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@#include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h> #include <linux/serial_8250.h> #include <linux/smc91x.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/usb/isp116x.h> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
@@ -396,6 +398,10 @@ static void viper_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free (VIPER_BCKLIGHT_EN_GPIO ); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data viper_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =100 ,
@@ -940,6 +946,8 @@ static void __init viper_init(void) smc91x_device.num_resources--;pxa_set_i2c_info (NULL ); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 );platform_add_devices (viper_devs,ARRAY_SIZE (viper_devs));viper_init_vcore_gpios ();
arch/arm/mach-pxa/z2.c +10 -0
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#include <linux/gpio_keys.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/i2c/pxa-i2c.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
@@ -199,6 +200,12 @@ static inline void z2_nor_init(void) {}* Backlight ******************************************************************************/ #if defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM) || defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PWM_MODULE) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply[] = { + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("enable", "pwm-backlight.0"), + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("enable", "pwm-backlight.1"), +}; + static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data z2_backlight_data[] = { [0] = { /* Keypad Backlight */
@@ -234,6 +241,9 @@ static struct platform_device z2_backlight_devices[2] = { };static void __init z2_pwm_init (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + backlight_supply, +ARRAY_SIZE (backlight_supply),0 );platform_device_register (&z2_backlight_devices[0 ]);platform_device_register (&z2_backlight_devices[1 ]); }
arch/arm/mach-pxa/zylonite.c +7 -0
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ static inline void zylonite_init_leds(void) {}#endif #if defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA ) || defined(CONFIG_FB_PXA_MODULE ) +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight.0" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data zylonite_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =3 , .max_brightness = 100,
@@ -205,6 +209,9 @@ static struct pxafb_mach_info zylonite_sharp_lcd_info = {static void __init zylonite_init_lcd (void ) { +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_device_register (&zylonite_backlight_device);if (lcd_id &0x20 ) {
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 4/9 ARM: EXYNOS: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c +7 -0
@@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ static void nuri_bl_exit(struct device *dev)gpio_free (EXYNOS4_GPE2 (3 )); } +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +/* nuri pwm backlight */ static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data nuri_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 ,
@@ -1368,6 +1372,9 @@ static void __init nuri_machine_init(void)nuri_ehci_init ();s3c_hsotg_set_platdata (&nuri_hsotg_pdata); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +/* Last */ platform_add_devices (nuri_devices,ARRAY_SIZE (nuri_devices)); }
arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c +9 -0
@@ -14,12 +14,18 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <plat/devs.h> #include <plat/gpio-cfg.h> #include <plat/backlight.h> +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static int samsung_bl_init (struct device *dev) {int ret =0 ;
@@ -37,6 +43,9 @@ static int samsung_bl_init(struct device *dev)/* Configure GPIO pin with specific GPIO function for PWM timer */ s3c_gpio_cfgpin (bl_gpio_info->no, bl_gpio_info->func); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 5/9 unicore32: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/unicore32/kernel/puv3-nb0916.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
arch/unicore32/kernel/puv3-nb0916.c +9 -0
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@#include <linux/reboot.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> #include <linux/pwm_backlight.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/gpio_keys.h>
@@ -49,6 +51,10 @@ static struct resource puv3_i2c_resources[] = { } }; +/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ +static struct regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply = +REGULATOR_SUPPLY ("enable" ,"pwm-backlight" ); +static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data nb0916_backlight_data = { .pwm_id =0 , .max_brightness =100 ,
@@ -111,6 +117,9 @@ int __init mach_nb0916_init(void)platform_device_register_simple ("PKUnity-v3-I2C" ,-1 , puv3_i2c_resources,ARRAY_SIZE (puv3_i2c_resources)); +regulator_register_always_on (-1 ,"backlight-enable" , + &backlight_supply,1 ,0 ); +platform_device_register_data (&platform_bus,"pwm-backlight" ,-1 , &nb0916_backlight_data,sizeof (nb0916_backlight_data));
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 6 ++++++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts +6 -0
@@ -97,10 +97,16 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 2 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts +6 -0
@@ -144,11 +144,17 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 3 191000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts +6 -0
@@ -299,10 +299,16 @@ rotary-encoder,relative-axis; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 3 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts +6 -0
@@ -307,10 +307,16 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 2 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts +6 -0
@@ -107,10 +107,16 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 0 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Dear Andrew Chew,
Quoted 5 lines
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>
Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Quoted 6 lines
Dear Andrew Chew,
Quoted 4 lines
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Because for those using board setup code (and not devicetree), it was not possible to distinguish between opting out of the regulator, and deferred probe, without adding something to the platform data that board setup code needed to fill in anyway.
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Dear Andrew Chew,
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Dear Andrew Chew,
Quoted 5 lines
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek VasutBecause for those using board setup code (and not devicetree), it was not possible to distinguish between opting out of the regulator, and deferred probe, without adding something to the platform data that board setup code needed to fill in anyway.
Sure, but this adds a bit of overhead for the DT platforms, no?
Other than this curiosity, I have no problems with this stuff.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Marek VasutQuoted 9 lines · Marek Vasut
Dear Andrew Chew,
Quoted 5 lines
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
IIRC, the previous advice I've seen is that if a device (driver) uses a regulator, it must /require/ a regulator, and if a particular board doesn't actually have a SW-controlled regulator, then a fixed- or dummy- regulator should be provided to satisfy this requirement.
CC'ing Mark Brown to make sure I really do Recall Correctly.
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Quoted 10 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 1 line · Marek Vasut
Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
IIRC, the previous advice I've seen is that if a device (driver) uses a regulator, it must /require/ a regulator, and if a particular board doesn't actually have a SW-controlled regulator, then a fixed- or dummy- regulator should be provided to satisfy this requirement.
CC'ing Mark Brown to make sure I really do Recall Correctly.
Yes, and it should be fixed rather than dummy. The issue is partly that
it's probably important that the device has power so we don't want to
just ignore errors and partly that this is something which applies to
essentially all devices so whatever we do for this case ought to be done
by the core so all devices can benefit and we don't have to duplicate
lots of code in individual drivers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130320/4d5a045b/attachment-0001.sig>
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Hi Mark,
Quoted 9 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 8 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 1 line
Do we really need a mandatory regulator? Why can't it be optional?
IIRC, the previous advice I've seen is that if a device (driver) uses a regulator, it must /require/ a regulator, and if a particular board doesn't actually have a SW-controlled regulator, then a fixed- or dummy- regulator should be provided to satisfy this requirement.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
CC'ing Mark Brown to make sure I really do Recall Correctly.
Yes, and it should be fixed rather than dummy. The issue is partly that it's probably important that the device has power so we don't want to just ignore errors and partly that this is something which applies to essentially all devices so whatever we do for this case ought to be done by the core so all devices can benefit and we don't have to duplicate lots of code in individual drivers.
Thanks for clearing this!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
PATCH v4 6/9 ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewQuoted 18 lines · Andrew Chew
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 6 ++++++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts line 100
Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts +1
-0@@ -97,10 +97,16 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator {
The node name is too generic. Very likely we have other fixed regulator in a dts.
For mxs, we have all such board level regulators defined in node "regulators" as children.
Shawn
Quoted 12 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts +5
-0+ compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 2 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
PATCH v4 7/9 ARM: vt8500: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts +6 -0
@@ -37,11 +37,17 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 0 50000 1>; /* duty inverted */ brightness-levels = <0 40 60 80 100 130 190 255>; default-brightness-level = <5>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 7/9 ARM: vt8500: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Quoted 21 lines · Andrew Chew
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts +4
-0@@ -37,11 +37,17 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + };
arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts line 53
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts +2
-0+ backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 0 50000 1>; /* duty inverted */ brightness-levels = <0 40 60 80 100 130 190 255>; default-brightness-level = <5>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; };
This board will use either <&gpio 0 7 0> or <&pinctrl 7 0>, dependant on the pinctrl driver patchset going through.
If you want it to 'work', feel free to add a regulator for the <&gpio 0 7 0> case - otherwise just leave the dummy and I'll patch it later once the pinctrl driver is finished.
I only know of one user who is disabling the backlight gpio at present, and he is doing it with a gpio-led node.
The backlight is enabled by uboot on all boards with an LCD present, so this is just a power-saving feature for us - nothing breaks by having a dummy.
Regards
Tony P
PATCH v4 8/9 ARM: tegra: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewThe pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts +6 -0
@@ -26,12 +26,18 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 0 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; }; sound {
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 8/9 ARM: tegra: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew Chew
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
I assume these patches will get merged through the PWM tree? If so,
PATCH v4 8/9 ARM: tegra: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
In reply to Andrew ChewQuoted 14 lines · Andrew Chew
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this requirement.
Signed-off-by Andrew Chew <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts line 32
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts +4
-0@@ -26,12 +26,18 @@ }; }; + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + };
This should go into the top-level regulators node which this DTS inherits from tegra20-tamonten.dtsi.
I think it'd be nice to rename it to something like backlight_reg for consistency with other regulators in that node.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130322/b3014e2c/attachment.sig>
PATCH v4 9/9 pwm_bl: Add mandatory backlight enable regulator
In reply to Andrew ChewMany backlights need to be explicitly enabled. Typically, this is done with a GPIO. For flexibility, we generalize the enable mechanism to a regulator.
If an enable regulator is not needed, then a dummy regulator can be given to the backlight driver. If a GPIO is used to enable the backlight, then a fixed regulator can be instantiated to control the GPIO.
The backlight enable regulator can be specified in the device tree node for the backlight, or can be done with legacy board setup code in the usual way.
--- .../bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt | 14 +++++ drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt +14 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ Required properties: last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). - default-brightness-level: the default brightness level (index into the array defined by the "brightness-levels" property) + - enable-supply: A phandle to the regulator device tree node. This + regulator will be turned on and off as the pwm is enabled and disabled. + Many backlights are enabled via a GPIO. In this case, we instantiate + a fixed regulator and give that to enable-supply. If a regulator + is not needed, then provide a dummy fixed regulator. Optional properties: - pwm-names: a list of names for the PWM devices specified in the
@@ -19,10 +24,19 @@ Optional properties: Example: + bl_en: fixed-regulator { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "bl-en-supply"; + regulator-boot-on; + gpio = <&some_gpio>; + enable-active-high; + }; + backlight { compatible = "pwm-backlight"; pwms = <&pwm 0 5000000>; brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>; default-brightness-level = <6>; + enable-supply = <&bl_en>; };
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +49 -10
111 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.5
PATCH v4 9/9 pwm_bl: Add mandatory backlight enable regulator
Quoted 17 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights need to be explicitly enabled. Typically, this is done with a GPIO. For flexibility, we generalize the enable mechanism to a regulator.
If an enable regulator is not needed, then a dummy regulator can be given to the backlight driver. If a GPIO is used to enable the backlight, then a fixed regulator can be instantiated to control the GPIO.
The backlight enable regulator can be specified in the device tree node for the backlight, or can be done with legacy board setup code in the usual way.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt +0
-0
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt Required properties: · line 17
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt +5
-0@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ Required properties: last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). - default-brightness-level: the default brightness level (index into the array defined by the "brightness-levels" property) + - enable-supply: A phandle to the regulator device tree node. This + regulator will be turned on and off as the pwm is enabled and disabled. + Many backlights are enabled via a GPIO. In this case, we instantiate + a fixed regulator and give that to enable-supply. If a regulator + is not needed, then provide a dummy fixed regulator.
"enable" doesn't seem like the right name here; if this really is an "enable" input, then it's not a regulator. If you're calling it "enable" because the regulator is usually controlled by a GPIO that enables it, then what you really have is a regulator that provides power to the backlight, and the method that you enable that regulator is irrelevant.
Put another way, wouldn't "power" be a better name, thus making the property "power-supply"? Although that property name migth be considered to have some negative correlation with other concepts, so if people object to that, perhaps e.g. "vdd-supply"?
PATCH v4 9/9 pwm_bl: Add mandatory backlight enable regulator
Quoted 33 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 17 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights need to be explicitly enabled. Typically, this is done with a GPIO. For flexibility, we generalize the enable mechanism to a regulator.
If an enable regulator is not needed, then a dummy regulator can be given to the backlight driver. If a GPIO is used to enable the backlight, then a fixed regulator can be instantiated to control the GPIO.
The backlight enable regulator can be specified in the device tree node for the backlight, or can be done with legacy board setup code in the usual way.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt +0
-0Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt Required properties: · line 17
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt +5
-0@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ Required properties: last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). - default-brightness-level: the default brightness level (index into the array defined by the "brightness-levels" property) + - enable-supply: A phandle to the regulator device tree node. This + regulator will be turned on and off as the pwm is enabled and disabled. + Many backlights are enabled via a GPIO. In this case, we instantiate + a fixed regulator and give that to enable-supply. If a regulator + is not needed, then provide a dummy fixed regulator."enable" doesn't seem like the right name here; if this really is an "enable" input, then it's not a regulator. If you're calling it "enable" because the regulator is usually controlled by a GPIO that enables it, then what you really have is a regulator that provides power to the backlight, and the method that you enable that regulator is irrelevant.
Quoted 4 lines
Put another way, wouldn't "power" be a better name, thus making the property "power-supply"? Although that property name migth be considered to have some negative correlation with other concepts, so if people object to that, perhaps e.g. "vdd-supply"?
"power" sounds like a reasonable name to me.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130320/e3abc94f/attachment-0001.sig>
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
In reply to Andrew ChewQuoted 3 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
I think we should push the series of "Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences" moving forward, which should be useful this case and many other cases as well.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1395912
Shawn
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
Quoted 9 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
I think we should push the series of "Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences" moving forward, which should be useful this case and many other cases as well.
That's still the medium-term plan. But doing this correctly requires some improvements to be done in the GPIO subsystem, which I am pushing at the moment.
Eventually power sequences should handle this kind of scenario, but by the meantime it cannot hurt to get the job done.
Alex.
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
Quoted 9 lines · Alex Courbot
Quoted 8 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
I think we should push the series of "Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences" moving forward, which should be useful this case and many other cases as well.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
That's still the medium-term plan. But doing this correctly requires some improvements to be done in the GPIO subsystem, which I am pushing at the moment.
Thanks for updating the status.
Quoted 3 lines
Eventually power sequences should handle this kind of scenario, but by the meantime it cannot hurt to get the job done.
It just makes us a little sick that a dummy fixed regulator is added all over the places merely for pwm-backlight to retrieve a GPIO from device tree.
Shawn
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
In reply to Alex CourbotQuoted 11 lines · Alex Courbot
Quoted 9 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 3 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
I think we should push the series of "Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences" moving forward, which should be useful this case and many other cases as well.
Quoted 8 lines
That's still the medium-term plan. But doing this correctly requires some improvements to be done in the GPIO subsystem, which I am pushing at the moment.
Eventually power sequences should handle this kind of scenario, but by the meantime it cannot hurt to get the job done.
Alex.
I don't mind this patch personally, so take this query as more of a 'generalization' than a problem with this patch:
This patch changes the binding for an already used device (by addition of a required property), which isn't so bad BUT, as Alex pointed out, the binding will probably end up being changed again once power sequencing is sorted out.
I realise it's still early days and things need to be tried-and-tested first, but wasn't the point of the bindings that they should be finalized (as best as possible anyway) the first time, so we don't have to worry about incompatibilities between bindings and drivers?
Regards
Tony P
v4 cover Add mandatory regulator for all users of pwm-backlight.
In reply to Andrew ChewQuoted 23 lines · Andrew Chew
Many backlights are enabled via GPIO. We can generalize the GPIO to a fixed regulator.
The enable regulator needs to be mandatory because there was no good way to determine the difference between opting out of the regulator, and probe deferral.
This series of patches is intended to add a dummy regulator (or a GPIO regulator) for all users of the pwm-backlight.
The last patch in the series will always be the pwm-backlight change to add this mandatory regulator. Patches following up to that patch add the mandatory regulator on a per mach family basis. Once all users of pwm-backlight have been patched, this series can be applied in order to maintain bisectability.
All I did in every case was to provide a dummy fixed regulator to pwm-backlight. If your platform actually uses a regulator (or a GPIO) to enable the backlight, please either let me know so that I can make the modifications and give you something back to test. Or (better yet), provide me with a tested, alternate patch that I can fold into this patch series.
Quoted 6 lines
I made sure that where there was a defconfig for an affected board, that it builds. I did not test-build the unicore patch.
V3 and earlier versions of this series only had the OMAP patch, which I used for ironing out some early, obvious stuff. V4 and later is the complete patch set.
For the series:
Thanks,
Alex.
Quoted 46 lines
Andrew Chew (9):
ARM: OMAP: board-4430sdp: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: S3C24XX: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: pxa: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: EXYNOS: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
unicore32: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: mxs: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: vt8500: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
ARM: tegra: Provide regulator to pwm-backlight
pwm_bl: Add mandatory backlight enable regulator.../bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt | 14 +++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23-evk.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-apf28dev.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-cfa10049.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-medcom-wide.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8850-w70v2.dts | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x300.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri-pxa270-income.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c | 13 ++++- arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palm27x.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmtc.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmte2.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 6 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/tavorevb.c | 11 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/z2.c | 10 ++++ arch/arm/mach-pxa/zylonite.c | 7 +++ arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-h1940.c | 8 +++ arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 9 ++++ arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-backlight.c | 9 ++++ arch/unicore32/kernel/puv3-nb0916.c | 9 ++++ drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++---- 32 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)