Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Reading remote reflogs

DISCUSSION Dennis Kaarsemaker 2 participants 5 messages Jun 15, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Is it possible to somehow fetch the reflog of a remote?

I would like to delegate some post-receive actions to an automatically mirrored clone of some repositories. Mirrored repositories don't maintain a reflog, even with core.logAllRefUpdates = true, so to be able to know what was pushed per push, it would need to somehow know the reflog of the origin.

Of course a post-receive hook can send this information downstream, but I'd like to keep the origin 'dumb' and not do that.

Signature · 2 lines
Dennis Kaarsemaker
www.kaarsemaker.net
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker

... Mirrored repositories don't
maintain a reflog, even with core.logAllRefUpdates = true,...

Are you sure about this? When log_all_ref_updates is not set, by default we do not log for bare repositories, but other than that, we do not do anything special with respect to reflogs.

	$ (cd .. && git clone --no-local --mirror git.git victim)
        $ git checkout next
        $ EDITOR=: git commit --amend
        $ cd ../victim
	$ git config core.logallrefupdates true
	$ git fetch
        $ find logs
	logs
        logs/HEAD
        logs/refs
        logs/refs/heads
        logs/refs/heads/next

It seems to record how a branch at its origin was updated just fine, at least to me.

#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker

... Mirrored repositories don't
maintain a reflog, even with core.logAllRefUpdates = true,...

Are you sure about this? When log_all_ref_updates is not set, by default we do not log for bare repositories, but other than that, we do not do anything special with respect to reflogs.

I was, as I tried the recipe below, though with a different repo. Must have goofed something up, as it works now. Thanks for the braincheck :)

That gives me a reasonable approximation of distinct pushes if I pull the mirror often enough. It's always going to be an approximation though, so the original question still stands.

Signature · 2 lines
Dennis Kaarsemaker
www.kaarsemaker.net
#3 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker
Quoted 8 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker

... Mirrored repositories don't
maintain a reflog, even with core.logAllRefUpdates = true,...

Are you sure about this? When log_all_ref_updates is not set, by default we do not log for bare repositories, but other than that, we do not do anything special with respect to reflogs.

Quoted 5 lines

I was, as I tried the recipe below, though with a different repo. Must have goofed something up, as it works now. Thanks for the braincheck :)

That gives me a reasonable approximation of distinct pushes if I pull the mirror often enough.

Instead of polling, why not "git push --mirror" whenever the original gets updated?

#4 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 10 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker
Quoted 8 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines · Dennis Kaarsemaker

... Mirrored repositories don't
maintain a reflog, even with core.logAllRefUpdates = true,...

Are you sure about this? When log_all_ref_updates is not set, by default we do not log for bare repositories, but other than that, we do not do anything special with respect to reflogs.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

I was, as I tried the recipe below, though with a different repo. Must have goofed something up, as it works now. Thanks for the braincheck :)

That gives me a reasonable approximation of distinct pushes if I pull the mirror often enough.

Instead of polling, why not "git push --mirror" whenever the original gets updated?

I considered that, but it has two downsides:
- Slows down the push as it needs to wait for this to complete
- Only works if you control the master, so it won't work with e.g. github hosted repositories

Signature · 2 lines
Dennis Kaarsemaker
www.kaarsemaker.net