linux-firmware: Package some iwlwifi firmware separately
PATCH 1/1 linux-firmware: Package some iwlwifi firmware separately
Taken from meta-intel, might as well merge this into the core recipe.
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb +10 -1
@@ -53,10 +53,12 @@ do_install() { ( cd ${D}/lib/firmware ; ln -sf ti-connectivity/* . ) } + PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \ ${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce ${PN}-rtl8192su \ ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330 ${PN}-bcm4334 \ - ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k" + ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ + ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6" FILES_${PN}-atheros-license = "/lib/firmware/LICENCE.atheros_firmware"
@@ -168,6 +170,13 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN}-bcm4334 += "${PN}-broadcom-license" ALTERNATIVE_linux-firmware-bcm4334 = "brcmfmac-sdio.bin" ALTERNATIVE_TARGET_linux-firmware-bcm4334[brcmfmac-sdio.bin] = "/lib/firmware/brcm/brcmfmac4334.bin" +RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-licence" +RDEPENDS_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6 = "${PN}-iwlwifi-licence" + +FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-licence = "/lib/firmware/LICENCE.iwlwifi_firmware" +FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 = "/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-6000g2a-5.ucode" +FILES_${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6 = "/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode" + FILES_${PN} += "/lib/firmware/*" # Make linux-firmware depend on all of the split-out packages.
meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb do_install() { · line 61
Quoted 6 lines · Richard Purdie
PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \ ${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce ${PN}-rtl8192su \ ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330 ${PN}-bcm4334 \meta/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bb +2
-1- ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k" + ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ + ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6"
Does it matter whether you use "licence" or "license"?
Quoted 9 lines · On Tuesday 25 June 2013 16:35:13 Trevor Woerner wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Richard Purdie
PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-ralink ${PN}-sd8686 ${PN}-wl12xx ${PN}-vt6656 \
${PN}-rtl-license ${PN}-rtl8192cu ${PN}-rtl8192ce ${PN}-rtl8192su \ ${PN}-broadcom-license ${PN}-bcm4329 ${PN}-bcm4330 ${PN}-bcm4334 \
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
- ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k ${PN}-ath6k
${PN}-ath9k" + ${PN}-atheros-license ${PN}-ar9170 ${PN}-ar3k
${PN}-ath6k ${PN}-ath9k \ + ${PN}-iwlwifi-licence
${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2a-5 ${PN}-iwlwifi-6000g2b-6"Does it matter whether you use "licence" or "license"?
For consistency I think it does. I also discovered an incorrect filename at the same time as looking into this. I've sent a patch to fix these.
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre