ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost to acpi_evaluate_ost for reuse
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v2 1/5 ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost to acpi_evaluate_ost for reuse
Rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost() for later resue.
--- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 14 ++++---------- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 10 +++++++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/utils.c +4 -10
@@ -433,17 +433,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_physical_device_location);* When the platform does not support _OST, this function has no effect. */ acpi_status -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event, -u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) +acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event,u32 status_code, +struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) { -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST union acpi_object params[3 ] = { {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,} };struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; -acpi_status status; params[0 ].integer.value = source_event; params[1 ].integer.value = status_code;
@@ -455,13 +453,9 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, params[2 ].buffer.length =0 ; } - status =acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -return status; -#else -return AE_OK ; -#endif +return acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL (acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (acpi_evaluate_ost);/** * acpi_handle_printk: Print message with ACPI prefix and object path
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +9 -1
@@ -49,8 +49,16 @@ acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_object_list *arguments, struct acpi_handle_list *list);acpi_status +acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event,u32 status_code, +struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); +#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST +#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost +#else +static inline acpi_status acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event, -u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); +u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) +{return AE_OK ; } +#endif acpi_status acpi_get_physical_device_location (acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 2/5 acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
Use public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method.
--- drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 24 +++++------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c +5 -19
@@ -408,28 +408,14 @@ static int acpi_pad_pur(acpi_handle handle)return num; } -/* Notify firmware how many CPUs are idle */ -static void acpi_pad_ost (acpi_handle handle,int stat, -uint32_t idle_cpus) -{ -union acpi_object params[3 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; - - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ; - params[1 ].integer.value = stat; - params[2 ].buffer.length =4 ; - params[2 ].buffer.pointer = (void *)&idle_cpus; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -} -static void acpi_pad_handle_notify (acpi_handle handle) {int num_cpus;uint32_t idle_cpus; +struct acpi_buffer param = { + .length =4 , + .pointer = (void *)&idle_cpus, + };mutex_lock (&isolated_cpus_lock); num_cpus =acpi_pad_pur (handle);
@@ -439,7 +425,7 @@ static void acpi_pad_handle_notify(acpi_handle handle) }acpi_pad_idle_cpus (num_cpus); idle_cpus =acpi_pad_idle_cpus_num (); -acpi_pad_ost (handle,0 , idle_cpus); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ,0 , ¶m);mutex_unlock (&isolated_cpus_lock); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 3/5 xen, acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
In reply to Jiang LiuUse public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method.
--- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c | 26 +++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c +7 -19
@@ -77,27 +77,14 @@ static int acpi_pad_pur(acpi_handle handle)return num; } -/* Notify firmware how many CPUs are idle */ -static void acpi_pad_ost (acpi_handle handle,int stat, -uint32_t idle_nums) -{ -union acpi_object params[3 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; - - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ; - params[1 ].integer.value = stat; - params[2 ].buffer.length =4 ; - params[2 ].buffer.pointer = (void *)&idle_nums; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -} -static void acpi_pad_handle_notify (acpi_handle handle) {int idle_nums; +struct acpi_buffer param = { + .length =4 , + .pointer = (void *)&idle_nums, + }; +mutex_lock (&xen_cpu_lock); idle_nums =acpi_pad_pur (handle);
@@ -109,7 +96,8 @@ static void acpi_pad_handle_notify(acpi_handle handle) idle_nums =xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus (idle_nums) ?:xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus_num ();if (idle_nums >=0 ) -acpi_pad_ost (handle,0 , idle_nums); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY , +0 , ¶m);mutex_unlock (&xen_cpu_lock); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [Patch v2 3/5] xen, acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
Quoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Use public function
acpi_evaluate_ost()to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI_OSTmethod.
Looks OK to me.
Quoted 55 lines
Signed-off-by Jiang Liu <[email protected]>--- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c | 26 +++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c +7
-19@@ -77,27 +77,14 @@ static int acpi_pad_pur(acpi_handle handle)return num; } -/* Notify firmware how many CPUs are idle */ -static void acpi_pad_ost (acpi_handle handle,int stat, -uint32_t idle_nums) -{ -union acpi_object params[3 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; - - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ; - params[1 ].integer.value = stat; - params[2 ].buffer.length =4 ; - params[2 ].buffer.pointer = (void *)&idle_nums; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -} -static void acpi_pad_handle_notify (acpi_handle handle) {int idle_nums; +struct acpi_buffer param = { + .length =4 , + .pointer = (void *)&idle_nums, + }; +mutex_lock (&xen_cpu_lock); idle_nums =acpi_pad_pur (handle);@@ -109,7 +96,8 @@ static void acpi_pad_handle_notify(acpi_handle handle) idle_nums =xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus (idle_nums) ?:xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus_num ();if (idle_nums >=0 ) -acpi_pad_ost (handle,0 , idle_nums); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY , +0 , ¶m);mutex_unlock (&xen_cpu_lock); }Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [Patch v2 3/5] xen, acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
In reply to Jiang LiuQuoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Use public function
acpi_evaluate_ost()to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI_OSTmethod.
Looks OK to me.
Quoted 55 lines
Signed-off-by Jiang Liu <[email protected]>--- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c | 26 +++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c +7
-19@@ -77,27 +77,14 @@ static int acpi_pad_pur(acpi_handle handle)return num; } -/* Notify firmware how many CPUs are idle */ -static void acpi_pad_ost (acpi_handle handle,int stat, -uint32_t idle_nums) -{ -union acpi_object params[3 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; - - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ; - params[1 ].integer.value = stat; - params[2 ].buffer.length =4 ; - params[2 ].buffer.pointer = (void *)&idle_nums; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -} -static void acpi_pad_handle_notify (acpi_handle handle) {int idle_nums; +struct acpi_buffer param = { + .length =4 , + .pointer = (void *)&idle_nums, + }; +mutex_lock (&xen_cpu_lock); idle_nums =acpi_pad_pur (handle);@@ -109,7 +96,8 @@ static void acpi_pad_handle_notify(acpi_handle handle) idle_nums =xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus (idle_nums) ?:xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus_num ();if (idle_nums >=0 ) -acpi_pad_ost (handle,0 , idle_nums); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY , +0 , ¶m);mutex_unlock (&xen_cpu_lock); }Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 3/5 xen, acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
In reply to Jiang LiuUse public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method.
--- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c | 26 +++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-pad.c +7 -19
@@ -77,27 +77,14 @@ static int acpi_pad_pur(acpi_handle handle)return num; } -/* Notify firmware how many CPUs are idle */ -static void acpi_pad_ost (acpi_handle handle,int stat, -uint32_t idle_nums) -{ -union acpi_object params[3 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3 , params}; - - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY ; - params[1 ].integer.value = stat; - params[2 ].buffer.length =4 ; - params[2 ].buffer.pointer = (void *)&idle_nums; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); -} -static void acpi_pad_handle_notify (acpi_handle handle) {int idle_nums; +struct acpi_buffer param = { + .length =4 , + .pointer = (void *)&idle_nums, + }; +mutex_lock (&xen_cpu_lock); idle_nums =acpi_pad_pur (handle);
@@ -109,7 +96,8 @@ static void acpi_pad_handle_notify(acpi_handle handle) idle_nums =xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus (idle_nums) ?:xen_acpi_pad_idle_cpus_num ();if (idle_nums >=0 ) -acpi_pad_ost (handle,0 , idle_nums); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY , +0 , ¶m);mutex_unlock (&xen_cpu_lock); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 4/5 acpi_processor: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version
In reply to Jiang LiuUse public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method.
--- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +3 -11
@@ -156,17 +156,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr)*/ static void acpi_processor_ppc_ost (acpi_handle handle,int status) { -union acpi_object params[2 ] = { - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - {.type =ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ,}, - }; -struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {2 , params}; - -if (acpi_has_method (handle,"_OST" )) { - params[0 ].integer.value =ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE ; - params[1 ].integer.value = status; -acpi_evaluate_object (handle,"_OST" , &arg_list,NULL ); - } +if (acpi_has_method (handle,"_OST" )) +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle,ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE , + status,NULL ); }int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed (struct acpi_processor *pr,int event_flag)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 5/5 ACPI: use device name LNXSYBUS.xx for ACPI \_SB and \_TZ objects
In reply to Jiang LiuUse device name "LNXSYBUS:xx" instead of "device.xx" for ACPI objects \_SB and \_TZ.
BTW, the original check of "handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT" in statment "else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)" is always false because of the code at the begin of that block.
if (handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SYSTEM_HID);
break;
}--- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/scan.c +18 -2
@@ -1706,6 +1706,20 @@ static bool acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)return false; } +static bool acpi_object_is_system_bus (acpi_handle handle) +{ +acpi_handle tmp; + +if (ACPI_SUCCESS (acpi_get_handle (NULL ,"\\_SB" , &tmp)) && + tmp == handle) +return true; +if (ACPI_SUCCESS (acpi_get_handle (NULL ,"\\_TZ" , &tmp)) && + tmp == handle) +return true; + +return false; +} +static void acpi_set_pnp_ids (acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,int device_type) {
@@ -1757,8 +1771,10 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,acpi_add_id (pnp,ACPI_DOCK_HID ); else if (acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle)) acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID); - else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) { -acpi_add_id (pnp,ACPI_BUS_HID );/* \_SB, LNXSYBUS */ + else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && + acpi_object_is_system_bus(handle)) { +/* \_SB, \_TZ, LNXSYBUS */ +acpi_add_id (pnp,ACPI_BUS_HID );strcpy (pnp->device_name,ACPI_BUS_DEVICE_NAME );strcpy (pnp->device_class,ACPI_BUS_CLASS ); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
In reply to Jiang LiuQuoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Rename
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()toacpi_evaluate_ost()for later resue.Signed-off-by Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Below is a patch replacing acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() and dropping the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST which I don't believe is necessary at all.
On top of the current linux-next and your series.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Subject: ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally.
--- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 +--- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c | 2 +- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 -------- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/bus.c +1 -3
@@ -311,9 +311,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_PPC_OST_SUPPORT ;#endif -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT ; -#endif if (!ghes_disable) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT ;
@@ -410,7 +408,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handlereturn ; err: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); }/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +0 -8
@@ -51,14 +51,6 @@ acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handacpi_status acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event,u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST -#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost -#else -static inline acpi_status -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event, -u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) -{return AE_OK ; } -#endif acpi_status acpi_get_physical_device_location (acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
drivers/acpi/scan.c +5 -5
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static int acpi_generic_hotplug_event(stdev_info (&adev->dev,"Eject disabled\n" );return -EPERM ; } -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , -ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , +ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL );return acpi_scan_hot_remove (adev); }return -EINVAL ;
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(void *data, u32 ost_code =ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS ; err_out: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_bus_put_acpi_device (adev);
@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, strucreturn count;put_device (&acpi_device->dev); -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , -ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , +ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL );return status ==AE_NO_MEMORY ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN ; }
drivers/acpi/utils.c +1 -1
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ out:EXPORT_SYMBOL (acpi_get_physical_device_location);/** -* acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations +* acpi_evaluate_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations * @handle: ACPI device handle * @source_event: source event code * @status_code: status code
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c +1 -1
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notif goto out; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_scan_lock_release ();
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c +1 -1
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_notify(acreturn ; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL );return ; }
Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
Hi Rafael,
I failed to get the point to kill ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST altogether:(
Should I merge it into my series and resend?
Hi Toshi,
Any comments here?
Quoted 148 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Rename
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()toacpi_evaluate_ost()for later resue.Signed-off-by Jiang Liu <[email protected]>Below is a patch replacing
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()withacpi_evaluate_ost()and dropping theACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTwhich I don't believe is necessary at all.On top of the current linux-next and your series.
Thanks,
Rafael---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Subject: ACPI: Dropacpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()andACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTReplace
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()withacpi_evaluate_ost()everywhere and drop theACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTsymbol so that hotplug_OSTis supported unconditionally.Signed-off-by Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>--- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 +--- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c | 2 +- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 -------- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/bus.c +1
-3@@ -311,9 +311,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_PPC_OST_SUPPORT ;#endif -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT ; -#endif if (!ghes_disable) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT ;@@ -410,7 +408,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handlereturn ; err: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); }/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index:
linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +0
-8@@ -51,14 +51,6 @@ acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handacpi_status acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event,u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST -#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost -#else -static inline acpi_status -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event, -u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) -{return AE_OK ; } -#endif acpi_status acpi_get_physical_device_location (acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_pld_info **pld);Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/scan.c +5
-5@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static int acpi_generic_hotplug_event(stdev_info (&adev->dev,"Eject disabled\n" );return -EPERM ; } -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , -ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , +ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL );return acpi_scan_hot_remove (adev); }return -EINVAL ;@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(void *data, u32 ost_code =ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS ; err_out: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_bus_put_acpi_device (adev);@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, strucreturn count;put_device (&acpi_device->dev); -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , -ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , +ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL );return status ==AE_NO_MEMORY ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN ; }Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/utils.c +1
-1@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ out:EXPORT_SYMBOL (acpi_get_physical_device_location);/** -* acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations +* acpi_evaluate_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations * @handle: ACPI device handle * @source_event: source event code * @status_code: status code Index:
linux-pm/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c
===================================================================drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c +1
-1@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notif goto out; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_scan_lock_release ();Index:
linux-pm/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c
===================================================================drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c +1
-1@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_notify(acreturn ; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL );return ; }
Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
Quoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Hi Rafael,
I failed to get the point to kill ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST altogether:(Should I merge it into my series and resend?
No, thanks, I can handle it.
Quoted 152 lines
Hi Toshi,
Any comments here?Quoted 148 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 3 lines · Jiang Liu
Rename
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()toacpi_evaluate_ost()for later resue.Signed-off-by Jiang Liu <[email protected]>Below is a patch replacing
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()withacpi_evaluate_ost()and dropping theACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTwhich I don't believe is necessary at all.On top of the current linux-next and your series.
Thanks,
Rafael---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Subject: ACPI: Dropacpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()andACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTReplace
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost()withacpi_evaluate_ost()everywhere and drop theACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTsymbol so that hotplug_OSTis supported unconditionally.Signed-off-by Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>--- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 +--- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c | 2 +- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 -------- 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/bus.c +1
-3@@ -311,9 +311,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_PPC_OST_SUPPORT ;#endif -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT ; -#endif if (!ghes_disable) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD ] |=OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT ;@@ -410,7 +408,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handlereturn ; err: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, type, ost_code,NULL ); }/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index:
linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +0
-8@@ -51,14 +51,6 @@ acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handacpi_status acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event,u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST -#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost -#else -static inline acpi_status -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_handle handle,u32 source_event, -u32 status_code,struct acpi_buffer *status_buf) -{return AE_OK ; } -#endif acpi_status acpi_get_physical_device_location (acpi_handle handle,struct acpi_pld_info **pld);Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/scan.c +5
-5@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static int acpi_generic_hotplug_event(stdev_info (&adev->dev,"Eject disabled\n" );return -EPERM ; } -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , -ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle,ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST , +ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS ,NULL );return acpi_scan_hot_remove (adev); }return -EINVAL ;@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(void *data, u32 ost_code =ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS ; err_out: -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (adev->handle, src, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_bus_put_acpi_device (adev);@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, strucreturn count;put_device (&acpi_device->dev); -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , -ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL ); +acpi_evaluate_ost (acpi_device->handle,ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT , +ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE ,NULL );return status ==AE_NO_MEMORY ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN ; }Index:
linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c
===================================================================drivers/acpi/utils.c +1
-1@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ out:EXPORT_SYMBOL (acpi_get_physical_device_location);/** -* acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations +* acpi_evaluate_ost: Evaluate _OST for hotplug operations * @handle: ACPI device handle * @source_event: source event code * @status_code: status code Index:
linux-pm/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c
===================================================================drivers/xen/xen-acpi-cpuhotplug.c +1
-1@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notif goto out; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); out:acpi_scan_lock_release ();Index:
linux-pm/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c
===================================================================drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c +1
-1@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_notify(acreturn ; } - (void )acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL ); + (void )acpi_evaluate_ost (handle, event, ost_code,NULL );return ; }
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Toshi Kani
Acked-byRe: [PATCH] ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
In reply to Jiang LiuQuoted 6 lines · Jiang Liu
Hi Rafael,
I failed to get the point to kill ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST altogether:(Should I merge it into my series and resend?
Hi Toshi,
Any comments here?
I agree with Rafael and the change looks good to me. linux/acpi.h should also be changed to drop ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST. This define was needed originally since we relied on type-specific hotplug notify handlers to call _OST. We now have the ACPI common hotplug handler to take care of _OST.
Thanks,
-Toshi
Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
Quoted 10 lines · Toshi Kani
Quoted 6 lines · Jiang Liu
Hi Rafael,
I failed to get the point to kill ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST altogether:(Should I merge it into my series and resend?
Hi Toshi,
Any comments here?I agree with Rafael and the change looks good to me.
linux/acpi.hshould also be changed to dropACPI_HOTPLUG_OST.
That is done by my patch too.
Quoted 6 lines
This define was needed
originally since we relied on type-specific hotplug notify handlers to call_OST. We now have the ACPI common hotplug handler to take care of_OST.Acked-by Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.