fetch2: Fix bug in file checksum generation
PATCH 1/1 fetch2: Fix bug in file checksum generation
For a while its been puzzling me why connman-gnome rebuilds as often as it does. It turns out you can trigger this with a new checkout of the metadata.
The SRC_URI that is causing the problems is:
SRC_URI = "file://images/*"
and rather oddly the results in checksums for a file "." being added to the tree, e.g.:
('.', 'ab48a68186f0e0f277c21ef4cb390b4b')
The problem is that when iterating files lists, the checksum variable can become set yet we don't break the out from the for loop, which leads to odd (and non-deterministic) entries being added into the file checksum list. The exact item added probably depends on the order of items on the disk.
Before this change, bitbake-diffsigs on connman-gnome:do_fetch would report:
This task depends on the checksums of files: [
('connman-signal-03.png', 'f6c16aee57b37b73793a2f1dea433ffa'), ('connman-signal-02.png', 'ad0cd22710c097d8174121fc1023c3be'), ('connman-signal-01.png', '8842bd83d2fa9ba56480df34c727c629'), ('null_check_for_ipv4_config.patch', 'a23271e41c9fe81551244d875106af10'), ('connman-signal-05.png', '808589e7e8d502b44c7b007e9e68d48c'), ('connman-signal-04.png', 'ab48a68186f0e0f277c21ef4cb390b4b'), ('null_check_for_ipv4_config.patch', 'a23271e41c9fe81551244d875106af10'), ('0001-Removed-icon-from-connman-gnome-about-applet.patch', 'e2d8269357c1e8c84291606da24eea85'), ('0001-Removed-icon-from-connman-gnome-about-applet.patch', 'e2d8269357c1e8c84291606da24eea85'), ('.', 'ab48a68186f0e0f277c21ef4cb390b4b')]
Afterwards:
This task depends on the checksums of files: [
('connman-signal-03.png', 'f6c16aee57b37b73793a2f1dea433ffa'), ('connman-signal-02.png', 'ad0cd22710c097d8174121fc1023c3be'), ('connman-signal-01.png', '8842bd83d2fa9ba56480df34c727c629'), ('null_check_for_ipv4_config.patch', 'a23271e41c9fe81551244d875106af10'), ('connman-signal-05.png', '808589e7e8d502b44c7b007e9e68d48c'), ('connman-signal-04.png', 'ab48a68186f0e0f277c21ef4cb390b4b'), ('null_check_for_ipv4_config.patch', 'a23271e41c9fe81551244d875106af10'), ('0001-Removed-icon-from-connman-gnome-about-applet.patch', 'e2d8269357c1e8c84291606da24eea85'), ('0001-Removed-icon-from-connman-gnome-about-applet.patch', 'e2d8269357c1e8c84291606da24eea85')]
which is correct and deterministic without the "." entry.
---
bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py +2 -0
@@ -969,6 +969,7 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksum = checksum_file(f) if checksum: checksums.append((f, checksum)) + continue elif os.path.isdir(pth): # Handle directories for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pth):
@@ -977,6 +978,7 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksum = checksum_file(fullpth) if checksum: checksums.append((fullpth, checksum)) + continue else: checksum = checksum_file(pth)
Hi Richard,
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py
Quoted 12 lines
index 4335e7a..8e5342f 100644
bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py +1
-0@@ -969,6 +969,7 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksum = checksum_file(f) if checksum: checksums.append((f, checksum)) + continue elif os.path.isdir(pth): # Handle directories for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pth):
bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): · line 984
Quoted 7 lines
bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py +1
-0@@ -977,6 +978,7 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksum = checksum_file(fullpth) if checksum: checksums.append((fullpth, checksum)) + continue else: checksum = checksum_file(pth)
Perhaps it would be cleaner to do
lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py +2 -3
@@ -979,9 +979,8 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksums.append((fullpth, checksum)) else: checksum = checksum_file(pth) - - if checksum: - checksums.append((pth, checksum)) + if checksum: + checksums.append((pth, checksum)) checksums.sort(key=operator.itemgetter(1)) return checksums
or am I missing something here ?
/Jacob
Quoted 20 lines · Jacob Kroon
Perhaps it would be cleaner to do
lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py +2
-3@@ -979,9 +979,8 @@ def get_file_checksums(filelist, pn): checksums.append((fullpth, checksum)) else: checksum = checksum_file(pth) - - if checksum: - checksums.append((pth, checksum)) + if checksum: + checksums.append((pth, checksum)) checksums.sort(key=operator.itemgetter(1)) return checksums
Quoted 1 line
or am I missing something here ?
The other patch indicates more specifically what the problem was, this is probably the cleaner code. They amount to the same thing...
Cheers,
Richard