Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ASoC: sirf-audio-codec: Simplify the new bitmask value in regmap_update_bits

PATCH Applied Axel Lin 2 participants 3 messages May 8, 2014 – May 26, 2014

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Axel Lin

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ASoC: sirf-audio-codec: Simplify the new bitmask value in regmap_update_bits

Having the binary ones complement operator in the new bitmak value makes the code hard to read.

---
I think the binary ones complement operator in such use case is error prone:
For example:
To set BIT(1) and clear both BIT(2) and BIT(3):
The following code has wrong result:
regmap_update_bits(regmap, the_register, BIT(1), BIT(2), BIT(3),

                   BIT(1) | ~BIT(2) | ~BIT(3));

Axel

 sound/soc/codecs/sirf-audio-codec.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
sound/soc/codecs/sirf-audio-codec.c +3 -5
index c5177bc..d90cb0f 100644
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void enable_and_reset_codec(struct regmap *regmap,
 {
 	regmap_update_bits(regmap, AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1,
 			codec_enable_bits | codec_reset_bits,
-			codec_enable_bits | ~codec_reset_bits);
+			codec_enable_bits);
 	msleep(20);
 	regmap_update_bits(regmap, AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1,
 			codec_reset_bits, codec_reset_bits);
@@ -128,8 +128,7 @@ static int atlas6_codec_enable_and_reset_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 		break;
 	case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD:
 		regmap_update_bits(sirf_audio_codec->regmap,
-			AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1, ATLAS6_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS,
-			~ATLAS6_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS);
+			AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1, ATLAS6_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS, 0);
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
@@ -151,8 +150,7 @@ static int prima2_codec_enable_and_reset_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 		break;
 	case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD:
 		regmap_update_bits(sirf_audio_codec->regmap,
-			AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1, PRIMA2_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS,
-			~PRIMA2_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS);
+			AUDIO_IC_CODEC_CTRL1, PRIMA2_CODEC_ENABLE_BITS, 0);
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
author
#1 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin

Having the binary ones complement operator in the new bitmak value makes the code hard to read.

---
I think the binary ones complement operator in such use case is error prone:
For example:
To set BIT(1) and clear both BIT(2) and BIT(3):
The following code has wrong result:
regmap_update_bits(regmap, the_register, BIT(1), BIT(2), BIT(3),

                   BIT(1) | ~BIT(2) | ~BIT(3));

Oops, I mean:
regmap_update_bits(regmap, the_register, BIT(1) | BIT(2)| BIT(3),

                   BIT(1) | ~BIT(2) | ~BIT(3));

Axel

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

maintainer Applied
#2 lore raw
In reply to Axel Lin
Quoted 2 lines · Axel Lin

Having the binary ones complement operator in the new bitmak value makes the code hard to read.

Applied, thanks.