Skip to contentSkip to conversation

powerpc: remove checks for CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS

PATCH In review Paul Bolle 2 participants 6 messages May 20, 2014 – May 23, 2014 PowerPC

lore
Share & tools
lore

Paul Bolle

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 powerpc: remove checks for CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS

Three checks for CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS were added in v2.6.32. But the related Kconfig symbol was never added. These checks have always evaluated to false. Remove them.

---
Untested.

A second order cleanup is now possible (ie, TLB_MISS_PROLOG_STATS and friends are, well, defined away). Perhaps it is preferable to include that cleanup in this patch.

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64e.h | 38 --------------------------------
 arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S            | 10 ---------
 2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64e.h +0 -38
index a563d9afd179..74004771baed 100644
@@ -69,14 +69,7 @@
 #define EX_TLB_ESR	( 9 * 8) /* Level 0 and 2 only */
 #define EX_TLB_SRR0	(10 * 8)
 #define EX_TLB_SRR1	(11 * 8)
-#ifdef CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS
-#define EX_TLB_R8	(12 * 8)
-#define EX_TLB_R9	(13 * 8)
-#define EX_TLB_LR	(14 * 8)
-#define EX_TLB_SIZE	(15 * 8)
-#else
 #define EX_TLB_SIZE	(12 * 8)
-#endif
 
 #define	START_EXCEPTION(label)						\
 	.globl exc_##label##_book3e;					\
@@ -161,36 +154,6 @@ exc_##label##_book3e:
 	addi	r11,r13,PACA_EXTLB;					    \
 	TLB_MISS_RESTORE(r11)
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS
-#define TLB_MISS_PROLOG_STATS						    \
-	mflr	r10;							    \
-	std	r8,EX_TLB_R8(r12);					    \
-	std	r9,EX_TLB_R9(r12);					    \
-	std	r10,EX_TLB_LR(r12);
-#define TLB_MISS_RESTORE_STATS					            \
-	ld	r16,EX_TLB_LR(r12);					    \
-	ld	r9,EX_TLB_R9(r12);					    \
-	ld	r8,EX_TLB_R8(r12);					    \
-	mtlr	r16;
-#define TLB_MISS_STATS_D(name)						    \
-	addi	r9,r13,MMSTAT_DSTATS+name;				    \
-	bl	.tlb_stat_inc;
-#define TLB_MISS_STATS_I(name)						    \
-	addi	r9,r13,MMSTAT_ISTATS+name;				    \
-	bl	.tlb_stat_inc;
-#define TLB_MISS_STATS_X(name)						    \
-	ld	r8,PACA_EXTLB+EX_TLB_ESR(r13);				    \
-	cmpdi	cr2,r8,-1;						    \
-	beq	cr2,61f;						    \
-	addi	r9,r13,MMSTAT_DSTATS+name;				    \
-	b	62f;							    \
-61:	addi	r9,r13,MMSTAT_ISTATS+name;				    \
-62:	bl	.tlb_stat_inc;
-#define TLB_MISS_STATS_SAVE_INFO					    \
-	std	r14,EX_TLB_ESR(r12);	/* save ESR */
-#define TLB_MISS_STATS_SAVE_INFO_BOLTED					    \
-	std	r14,PACA_EXTLB+EX_TLB_ESR(r13);	/* save ESR */
-#else
 #define TLB_MISS_PROLOG_STATS
 #define TLB_MISS_RESTORE_STATS
 #define TLB_MISS_PROLOG_STATS_BOLTED
@@ -201,7 +164,6 @@ exc_##label##_book3e:
 #define TLB_MISS_STATS_Y(name)
 #define TLB_MISS_STATS_SAVE_INFO
 #define TLB_MISS_STATS_SAVE_INFO_BOLTED
-#endif
 
 #define SET_IVOR(vector_number, vector_offset)	\
 	li	r3,vector_offset@l; 		\
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S +0 -10
index 356e8b41fb09..7e25fe472801 100644
@@ -1159,13 +1159,3 @@ tlb_load_linear_fault:
 	b	exc_data_storage_book3e
 1:	TLB_MISS_EPILOG_ERROR_SPECIAL
 	b	exc_instruction_storage_book3e
-
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS
-.tlb_stat_inc:
-1:	ldarx	r8,0,r9
-	addi	r8,r8,1
-	stdcx.	r8,0,r9
-	bne-	1b
-	blr
-#endif
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0
#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Paul Bolle

Three checks for CONFIG_BOOK3E_MMU_TLB_STATS were added in v2.6.32. But the related Kconfig symbol was never added. These checks have always evaluated to false. Remove them.

---
Untested.

Quoted 7 lines

A second order cleanup is now possible (ie, TLB_MISS_PROLOG_STATS and friends are, well, defined away). Perhaps it is preferable to include that cleanup in this patch.

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64e.h | 38 --------------------------------
 arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S            | 10 ---------
 2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)

/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: Assembler messages:
/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats'

-Scott

author
#2 lore raw

Scott,

Quoted 9 lines · Scott Wood

/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: Assembler messages:
/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats'

Thanks for testing!

That's a bit surprising. The patch is intended to be a non event. Ie, it only removes what the preprocessor would have removed anyway. Unless I botched it, of course.

What exactly did you test there?

Paul Bolle

author
#3 lore raw
Quoted 13 lines · Paul Bolle

Scott,

Quoted 9 lines · Scott Wood

/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: Assembler messages:
/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats'

Quoted 7 lines

Thanks for testing!

That's a bit surprising. The patch is intended to be a non event. Ie, it only removes what the preprocessor would have removed anyway. Unless I botched it, of course.

What exactly did you test there?

For what it's worth: I can't reproduce this error with the cross compiler now shipped with Fedora 20 (ie, powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130717 (Red Hat 4.8.1-5)). It shows a nice and clean
AS arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.o

in the output.

That's v3.15-rc6, with just this patch, and using a .config generated, with "make oldconfig", from arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64e_defconfig.

Paul Bolle

#4 lore raw
Quoted 27 lines · Paul Bolle
Quoted 13 lines · Paul Bolle

Scott,

Quoted 9 lines · Scott Wood

/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: Assembler messages:
/home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats' /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: Error: unrecognized opcode: tlb_miss_prolog_stats'

Quoted 7 lines

Thanks for testing!

That's a bit surprising. The patch is intended to be a non event. Ie, it only removes what the preprocessor would have removed anyway. Unless I botched it, of course.

What exactly did you test there?

For what it's worth: I can't reproduce this error with the cross compiler now shipped with Fedora 20 (ie, powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130717 (Red Hat 4.8.1-5)). It shows a nice and clean
AS arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.o

Quoted 4 lines

in the output.

That's v3.15-rc6, with just this patch, and using a .config generated, with "make oldconfig", from arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64e_defconfig.

Hmm, I tried applying again and it was fine. I guess I accidentally removed one line too many when resolving a conflict with b1576fec7f4dd4657694fefc97fda4cf28ec68e9 "powerpc: No need to use dot symbols when branching to a function" that's in Ben's -next tree.

-Scott

author
#5 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Scott Wood
Quoted 5 lines · Paul Bolle

For what it's worth: I can't reproduce this error with the cross compiler now shipped with Fedora 20 (ie, powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130717 (Red Hat 4.8.1-5)). It shows a nice and clean
AS arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.o

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

in the output.

That's v3.15-rc6, with just this patch, and using a .config generated, with "make oldconfig", from arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64e_defconfig.

Hmm, I tried applying again and it was fine.

That's a relieve. Thanks, again, for testing!

Paul Bolle