Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Documentation: Fix typo 'CONFIG_AFS'

PATCH In review Paul Bolle 2 participants 3 messages Jun 25, 2014 Documentation

lore
Share & tools
lore

Paul Bolle

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Documentation: Fix typo 'CONFIG_AFS'

---
Perhaps AF_RXRPC should be dropped from this short list (it is selected if AFS_FS is set). But since I couldn't actually determine how AFS_FS and RXKAD interact I decided to not touch that list any further.

 Documentation/filesystems/afs.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/filesystems/afs.txt +1 -1
index ffef91c4e0d6..5857253e2e1b 100644
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ options:
 
 	CONFIG_AF_RXRPC		- The RxRPC protocol transport
 	CONFIG_RXKAD		- The RxRPC Kerberos security handler
-	CONFIG_AFS		- The AFS filesystem
+	CONFIG_AFS_FS		- The AFS filesystem
 
 Additionally, the following can be turned on to aid debugging:
 
Signature · 1 line
1.9.3
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Paul Bolle

Perhaps AF_RXRPC should be dropped from this short list (it is selected if AFS_FS is set). But since I couldn't actually determine how AFS_FS and RXKAD interact I decided to not touch that list any further.

The key_type_rxrpc key that the AFS fs or userspace passes to AF_RXRPC indicates the protocol that AF_RXRPC should use. The AFS fs doesn't need to care how the security actually works and the token is opaque to it.

rxkad registers itself with AF_RXRPC, which maintains a list. The security_index is the number that appears in the protocol that indicates the security driver to use.

David

author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · David Howells
Quoted 3 lines · Paul Bolle

Perhaps AF_RXRPC should be dropped from this short list (it is selected if AFS_FS is set). But since I couldn't actually determine how AFS_FS and RXKAD interact I decided to not touch that list any further.

Quoted 7 lines

The key_type_rxrpc key that the AFS fs or userspace passes to AF_RXRPC indicates the protocol that AF_RXRPC should use. The AFS fs doesn't need to care how the security actually works and the token is opaque to it.

rxkad registers itself with AF_RXRPC, which maintains a list. The security_index is the number that appears in the protocol that indicates the security driver to use.

Thanks. That would have taken me quite a bit of time to figure out.

I'll leave that short list as is, unless you prefer that I send a v2 dropping AF_RXRPC.

Paul Bolle