hwmon: (ads1015) Use of_property_read_u32 at appropriate places
PATCH v3 2/2 hwmon: (ads1015) Use of_property_read_u32 at appropriate places
Simplify the code a bit and also improve readability.
--- drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c | 21 ++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c +8 -13
@@ -184,20 +184,18 @@ static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client)return -EINVAL ;for_each_child_of_node (client->dev.of_node, node) { -const __be32 *property; -int len; +u32 pval;unsigned int channel;unsigned int pga =ADS1015_DEFAULT_PGA ;unsigned int data_rate =ADS1015_DEFAULT_DATA_RATE ; - property =of_get_property (node,"reg" , &len); -if (!property || len !=sizeof (int )) { +if (of_property_read_u32 (node,"reg" , &pval)) {dev_err (&client->dev,"invalid reg on %s\n" , node->full_name);continue ; } - channel =be32_to_cpup (property); + channel = pval;if (channel >ADS1015_CHANNELS ) { dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid channel index %d on %s\n",
@@ -205,20 +203,17 @@ static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client)continue ; } - property =of_get_property (node,"ti,gain" , &len); -if (property && len =sizeof (int )) { - pga =be32_to_cpup (property); +if (!of_property_read_u32 (node,"ti,gain" , &pval)) { + pga = pval;if (pga >6 ) { -dev_err (&client->dev, -"invalid gain on %s\n" , +dev_err (&client->dev,"invalid gain on %s\n" , node->full_name);return -EINVAL ; } } - property =of_get_property (node,"ti,datarate" , &len); -if (property && len =sizeof (int )) { - data_rate =be32_to_cpup (property); +if (!of_property_read_u32 (node,"ti,datarate" , &pval)) { + data_rate = pval;if (data_rate >7 ) { dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid data_rate on %s\n",
Signature · 9 lines
1.9.1 _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
Guenter Roeck
maintainerQuoted 3 lines · Axel Lin
Simplify the code a bit and also improve readability.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Hi Axel,
Unfortunately, this patch does not apply for me. Looks like your branch is missing commit 56de1377 (hwmon: (ads1015) Fix off-by-one for valid channel index checking). Can you rebase your branch to make sure it is included ? The above patch should hopefully be in mainline in a day or so, but you should have it already (after all, it is one of your patches ;-).
Thanks,
Guenter
Quoted 49 lines
--- drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c | 21 ++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c +6
-10@@ -184,20 +184,18 @@ static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client)return -EINVAL ;for_each_child_of_node (client->dev.of_node, node) { -const __be32 *property; -int len; +u32 pval;unsigned int channel;unsigned int pga =ADS1015_DEFAULT_PGA ;unsigned int data_rate =ADS1015_DEFAULT_DATA_RATE ; - property =of_get_property (node,"reg" , &len); -if (!property || len !=sizeof (int )) { +if (of_property_read_u32 (node,"reg" , &pval)) {dev_err (&client->dev,"invalid reg on %s\n" , node->full_name);continue ; } - channel =be32_to_cpup (property); + channel = pval;if (channel >ADS1015_CHANNELS ) { dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid channel index %d on %s\n",@@ -205,20 +203,17 @@ static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client)continue ; } - property =of_get_property (node,"ti,gain" , &len); -if (property && len =sizeof (int )) { - pga =be32_to_cpup (property); +if (!of_property_read_u32 (node,"ti,gain" , &pval)) { + pga = pval;if (pga >6 ) { -dev_err (&client->dev, -"invalid gain on %s\n" , +dev_err (&client->dev,"invalid gain on %s\n" , node->full_name);return -EINVAL ; }
drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c static int ads1015_get_channels_config_of(struct i2c_client *client) · line 219
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/hwmon/ads1015.c +2
-3} - property =of_get_property (node,"ti,datarate" , &len); -if (property && len =sizeof (int )) { - data_rate =be32_to_cpup (property); +if (!of_property_read_u32 (node,"ti,datarate" , &pval)) { + data_rate = pval;if (data_rate >7 ) { dev_err(&client->dev, "invalid data_rate on %s\n",
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
2014-08-05 10:49 GMT+08:00 Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>:
Quoted 9 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 4 lines
Simplify the code a bit and also improve readability.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>Hi Axel,
Quoted 9 lines
Unfortunately, this patch does not apply for me. Looks like your branch is missing
commit56de1377(hwmon: (ads1015) Fix off-by-one for valid channel index checking).
Can you rebase your branch to make sure it is included ? The above patch should
hopefully be in mainline in a day or so, but you should have it already (after all,
it is one of your patches ;-).
It's because I use linux-next tree.
And the commit 56de1377 (hwmon: (ads1015) Fix off-by-one for valid channel index checking is still
not in linux-next (20140804).
I'll resend this patch soon.
(Obviously, I need more coffee this morning..)
Thanks,
Axel
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
Guenter Roeck
maintainerQuoted 19 lines · Axel Lin
2014-08-05 10:49 GMT+08:00 Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>:
Quoted 9 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 4 lines
Simplify the code a bit and also improve readability.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>Hi Axel,
Quoted 9 lines
Unfortunately, this patch does not apply for me. Looks like your branch is missing
commit56de1377(hwmon: (ads1015) Fix off-by-one for valid channel index checking).
Can you rebase your branch to make sure it is included ? The above patch should
hopefully be in mainline in a day or so, but you should have it already (after all,
it is one of your patches ;-).
Quoted 5 lines
It's because I use linux-next tree.
And the commit56de1377(hwmon: (ads1015) Fix off-by-one for valid channel index checking is still
not in linux-next (20140804).
Yeah, sorry. I missed to rebase my -next branch to my bug-fix branch last week, and only noticed this morning when I prepared my pull request. Vacation does that for you. I already got a ding on my head for it from Stephen, with copy to Linus :-(.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors