Skip to contentSkip to conversation

drm/i915: call drm_vblank_cleanup() earlier at unload

PATCH Applied Paulo Zanoni 3 participants 3 messages Oct 15, 2014 – Oct 21, 2014

Subsystems (2)
DRM drivers Intel i915
lore
Share & tools
lore

Paulo Zanoni

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 drm/i915: call drm_vblank_cleanup() earlier at unload

From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>

In its current place, it just segfaults while trying to access the CRTC structures:

[ 9132.421681] Call Trace:
[ 9132.421707]  [<ffffffffa01130d8>] i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos+0x1e8/0x220 [i915]
[ 9132.421727]  [<ffffffffa001da34>] drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x94/0x330 [drm]
[ 9132.421744]  [<ffffffffa001d240>] ?vblank_disable_and_save+0x40/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421769]  [<ffffffffa0114328>] i915_get_vblank_timestamp+0x68/0xb0 [i915]
[ 9132.421786]  [<ffffffffa001d094>] drm_get_last_vbltimestamp+0x44/0x80 [drm]
[ 9132.421801]  [<ffffffffa001d3a6>] vblank_disable_and_save+0x1a6/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421817]  [<ffffffffa001eac1>] drm_vblank_cleanup+0x61/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.421849]  [<ffffffffa0177a5e>] i915_driver_unload+0xde/0x290 [i915]
[ 9132.421867]  [<ffffffffa0020264>] drm_dev_unregister+0x24/0xb0 [drm]
[ 9132.421884]  [<ffffffffa002090e>] drm_put_dev+0x1e/0x70 [drm]
[ 9132.421901]  [<ffffffffa00e01e0>] i915_pci_remove+0x10/0x20 [i915]
[ 9132.421910]  [<ffffffff81347556>] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[ 9132.421920]  [<ffffffff8140084a>] __device_release_driver+0x7a/0xf0
[ 9132.421928]  [<ffffffff81400fc8>] driver_detach+0xb8/0xc0
[ 9132.421936]  [<ffffffff8140054a>] bus_remove_driver+0x4a/0xb0
[ 9132.421944]  [<ffffffff81401717>] driver_unregister+0x27/0x50
[ 9132.421953]  [<ffffffff81346f65>] pci_unregister_driver+0x25/0x70
[ 9132.421971]  [<ffffffffa00229c8>] drm_pci_exit+0x78/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.422000]  [<ffffffffa017a6d2>] i915_exit+0x20/0x94e [i915]
[ 9132.422009]  [<ffffffff810fb9dc>] SyS_delete_module+0x13c/0x1f0
[ 9132.422019]  [<ffffffff8131c5fb>] ?
trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 9132.422028]  [<ffffffff816f7792>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

This means it has to be before intel_modeset_cleanup, which cleans the CRTC structures. But if we move it to before intel_fbdev_fini(), we get WARNs because intel_fbdev_fini() still tries to use the vblanks, so the only acceptable point for drm_vblank_cleanup() seems to be this place.

Related commit:

commit cbb47d179fb345c579cd8cd884693903fceed26a
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Sep 23 17:33:20 2013 -0300
drm/i915: Add some missing steps to i915_driver_load error path

Testsuite: igt/drv_module_reload
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77511
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83484

Signed-off-by Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c +5 -3
index 85d14e1..1b39807 100644
@@ -1853,8 +1853,12 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	acpi_video_unregister();
 
-	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
+	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
 		intel_fbdev_fini(dev);
+
+	drm_vblank_cleanup(dev);
+
+	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
 		intel_modeset_cleanup(dev);
 
 		/*

@@ -1895,8 +1899,6 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 			i915_free_hws(dev);
 	}
 
-	drm_vblank_cleanup(dev);
-
 	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);
 	intel_teardown_mchbar(dev);
Signature · 1 line
2.1.1
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 30 lines · Paulo Zanoni

From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>

In its current place, it just segfaults while trying to access the CRTC structures:

[ 9132.421681] Call Trace:
[ 9132.421707]  [<ffffffffa01130d8>] i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos+0x1e8/0x220 [i915]
[ 9132.421727]  [<ffffffffa001da34>] drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x94/0x330 [drm]
[ 9132.421744]  [<ffffffffa001d240>] ?vblank_disable_and_save+0x40/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421769]  [<ffffffffa0114328>] i915_get_vblank_timestamp+0x68/0xb0 [i915]
[ 9132.421786]  [<ffffffffa001d094>] drm_get_last_vbltimestamp+0x44/0x80 [drm]
[ 9132.421801]  [<ffffffffa001d3a6>] vblank_disable_and_save+0x1a6/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421817]  [<ffffffffa001eac1>] drm_vblank_cleanup+0x61/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.421849]  [<ffffffffa0177a5e>] i915_driver_unload+0xde/0x290 [i915]
[ 9132.421867]  [<ffffffffa0020264>] drm_dev_unregister+0x24/0xb0 [drm]
[ 9132.421884]  [<ffffffffa002090e>] drm_put_dev+0x1e/0x70 [drm]
[ 9132.421901]  [<ffffffffa00e01e0>] i915_pci_remove+0x10/0x20 [i915]
[ 9132.421910]  [<ffffffff81347556>] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[ 9132.421920]  [<ffffffff8140084a>] __device_release_driver+0x7a/0xf0
[ 9132.421928]  [<ffffffff81400fc8>] driver_detach+0xb8/0xc0
[ 9132.421936]  [<ffffffff8140054a>] bus_remove_driver+0x4a/0xb0
[ 9132.421944]  [<ffffffff81401717>] driver_unregister+0x27/0x50
[ 9132.421953]  [<ffffffff81346f65>] pci_unregister_driver+0x25/0x70
[ 9132.421971]  [<ffffffffa00229c8>] drm_pci_exit+0x78/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.422000]  [<ffffffffa017a6d2>] i915_exit+0x20/0x94e [i915]
[ 9132.422009]  [<ffffffff810fb9dc>] SyS_delete_module+0x13c/0x1f0
[ 9132.422019]  [<ffffffff8131c5fb>] ?
trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 9132.422028]  [<ffffffff816f7792>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Quoted 5 lines

This means it has to be before intel_modeset_cleanup, which cleans the CRTC structures. But if we move it to before intel_fbdev_fini(), we get WARNs because intel_fbdev_fini() still tries to use the vblanks, so the only acceptable point for drm_vblank_cleanup() seems to be this place.

Hmm. Yeah that seems like the spot we have to put it given it wants to call the vblank disable hook.

Reviewed-by Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Quoted 50 lines

Related commit:

commit cbb47d179fb345c579cd8cd884693903fceed26a
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Sep 23 17:33:20 2013 -0300
drm/i915: Add some missing steps to i915_driver_load error path

Testsuite: igt/drv_module_reload
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77511
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83484

Signed-off-by Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c +5 -3
index 85d14e1..1b39807 100644
@@ -1853,8 +1853,12 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	acpi_video_unregister();
 
-	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
+	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
 		intel_fbdev_fini(dev);
+
+	drm_vblank_cleanup(dev);
+
+	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
 		intel_modeset_cleanup(dev);
 
 		/*

@@ -1895,8 +1899,6 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 			i915_free_hws(dev);
 	}
 
-	drm_vblank_cleanup(dev);
-
 	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);
 	intel_teardown_mchbar(dev);
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Signature · 2 lines
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
Applied
#2 lore raw
Quoted 37 lines · Ville Syrjälä
Quoted 30 lines · Paulo Zanoni

From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>

In its current place, it just segfaults while trying to access the CRTC structures:

[ 9132.421681] Call Trace:
[ 9132.421707]  [<ffffffffa01130d8>] i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos+0x1e8/0x220 [i915]
[ 9132.421727]  [<ffffffffa001da34>] drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x94/0x330 [drm]
[ 9132.421744]  [<ffffffffa001d240>] ?vblank_disable_and_save+0x40/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421769]  [<ffffffffa0114328>] i915_get_vblank_timestamp+0x68/0xb0 [i915]
[ 9132.421786]  [<ffffffffa001d094>] drm_get_last_vbltimestamp+0x44/0x80 [drm]
[ 9132.421801]  [<ffffffffa001d3a6>] vblank_disable_and_save+0x1a6/0x1e0 [drm]
[ 9132.421817]  [<ffffffffa001eac1>] drm_vblank_cleanup+0x61/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.421849]  [<ffffffffa0177a5e>] i915_driver_unload+0xde/0x290 [i915]
[ 9132.421867]  [<ffffffffa0020264>] drm_dev_unregister+0x24/0xb0 [drm]
[ 9132.421884]  [<ffffffffa002090e>] drm_put_dev+0x1e/0x70 [drm]
[ 9132.421901]  [<ffffffffa00e01e0>] i915_pci_remove+0x10/0x20 [i915]
[ 9132.421910]  [<ffffffff81347556>] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
[ 9132.421920]  [<ffffffff8140084a>] __device_release_driver+0x7a/0xf0
[ 9132.421928]  [<ffffffff81400fc8>] driver_detach+0xb8/0xc0
[ 9132.421936]  [<ffffffff8140054a>] bus_remove_driver+0x4a/0xb0
[ 9132.421944]  [<ffffffff81401717>] driver_unregister+0x27/0x50
[ 9132.421953]  [<ffffffff81346f65>] pci_unregister_driver+0x25/0x70
[ 9132.421971]  [<ffffffffa00229c8>] drm_pci_exit+0x78/0xa0 [drm]
[ 9132.422000]  [<ffffffffa017a6d2>] i915_exit+0x20/0x94e [i915]
[ 9132.422009]  [<ffffffff810fb9dc>] SyS_delete_module+0x13c/0x1f0
[ 9132.422019]  [<ffffffff8131c5fb>] ?
trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 9132.422028]  [<ffffffff816f7792>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Quoted 5 lines

This means it has to be before intel_modeset_cleanup, which cleans the CRTC structures. But if we move it to before intel_fbdev_fini(), we get WARNs because intel_fbdev_fini() still tries to use the vblanks, so the only acceptable point for drm_vblank_cleanup() seems to be this place.

Quoted 4 lines

Hmm. Yeah that seems like the spot we have to put it given it wants to call the vblank disable hook.

Reviewed-by Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

Signature · 3 lines
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch