xen: remove Xencomm
PATCH v2 1/1 xen: remove Xencomm
Being a feature that has only been used by ia64 and/or ppc it doesn't seem like we need to keep it any longer in the tree.
So remove it.
---
This was suggested by Boris a while ago and seems to have stalled.
v2: leave public header in place (suggested by Jan Beulich).
--- xen/common/Makefile | 2 - xen/common/xencomm.c | 621 ---------------------------------------------- xen/include/Makefile | 1 - xen/include/xen/xencomm.h | 170 ------------- 4 files changed, 794 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 xen/common/xencomm.c delete mode 100644 xen/include/xen/xencomm.h
xen/common/Makefile +0 -2
@@ -62,8 +62,6 @@ obj-$(perfc) += perfc.o obj-$(crash_debug) += gdbstub.o obj-$(xenoprof) += xenoprof.o -obj-$(CONFIG_XENCOMM) += xencomm.o - subdir-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat subdir-$(x86_64) += hvm
xen/common/xencomm.c deleted +0 -621
621 lines not on this page · raw message
xen/include/Makefile +0 -1
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ headers-y := \ compat/vcpu.h \ compat/version.h \ compat/xen.h \ - compat/xencomm.h \ compat/xenoprof.h headers-$(CONFIG_X86) += compat/arch-x86/xen-mca.h headers-$(CONFIG_X86) += compat/arch-x86/xen.h
xen/include/xen/xencomm.h deleted +0 -170
170 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.0.1
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 13.11.14 at 17:03, <[email protected]> wrote:
Being a feature that has only been used by ia64 and/or ppc it doesn't seem like we need to keep it any longer in the tree.
So remove it.
Signed-off-by Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tim Deegan <[email protected]>
Quoted 10 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 13.11.14 at 17:03, <[email protected]> wrote:
Being a feature that has only been used by ia64 and/or ppc it doesn't seem like we need to keep it any longer in the tree.
So remove it.
Signed-off-by Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tim Deegan <[email protected]>Acked-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Are folks OK if this is deferred to Xen 4.6?
Thank you!
Quoted 5 lines · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Quoted 4 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 13.11.14 at 17:03, <[email protected]> wrote:
Being a feature that has only been used by ia64 and/or ppc it doesn't seem like we need to keep it any longer in the tree.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
So remove it.
Signed-off-by Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tim Deegan <[email protected]>Acked-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>Are folks OK if this is deferred to Xen 4.6?
Yes, sure. I'll queue it up for committing after the branch.
Tim.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 13.11.14 at 20:18, <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 4 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 13.11.14 at 17:03, <[email protected]> wrote:
Being a feature that has only been used by ia64 and/or ppc it doesn't seem like we need to keep it any longer in the tree.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
So remove it.
Signed-off-by Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tim Deegan <[email protected]>Acked-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>Are folks OK if this is deferred to Xen 4.6?
Sure, albeit I can't resist to say that the change is zero risk.
Jan