serial: fix parisc boot hang
PATCH 1/1 serial: fix parisc boot hang
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial: serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the _emit path in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.
---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3 -1
@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; } -dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 18 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; } -dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));
Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
greg k-h
Quoted 22 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 21 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; }
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1-dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
OK, well this turned out to be one of the weirder fishing expeditions I've been on. The problem is this strange linux specific printf format flag %pV. The way to fix the bug is not to indirect the dev_xxx printks via %pV. What's happening is that in some circumstances, using %pV corrupts the stack.
The reason seems to be that whoever came up with %pV didn't read the man pages carefully enough. In all the examples and use cases, the va_list is passed by *copy* not by reference. For some inexplicable reason it's passed by reference in struct va_format. Sure enough when I fix up my local tree to pass by copy it all works (at least as far as I can tell:
most of the time the stack corruption passes unnoticed and minor disturbances can affect that. However, the type and size of the va_list is the same in reference and copy, so I think it's reasonably definitive).
I'd really like one of our gcc experts to comment here because all of these are builtin_ types and functions, so why there's a problem is a mystery (translate: I don't understand enough of gcc to make sense of the source code), but the surmise would be that the builtins are taking some stack frame information from the source and, because it's a pointer not a copy, it's in the wrong frame.
Assuming this turns out to be the problem, fixing it is going to be a real bugger because on most platforms, the type of va_list is void * meaning you can't tell the difference at compile time between a copy and a reference, because typeof(void *) == typeof(void **), and this %pV is sprayed all over our code base.
We should probably also have the security experts look it over because any way of inducing stack frame corruption is potentially exploitable, although, in this case, I think all of the uses are internal so the user doesn't have the ability to influence the source data.
James
Quoted 62 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 22 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 21 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; }Quoted 9 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1-dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
OK, well this turned out to be one of the weirder fishing expeditions I've been on. The problem is this strange linux specific printf format flag %pV. The way to fix the bug is not to indirect the
dev_xxxprintks via %pV. What's happening is that in some circumstances, using %pV corrupts the stack.The reason seems to be that whoever came up with %pV didn't read the man pages carefully enough. In all the examples and use cases, the
va_listis passed by *copy* not by reference. For some inexplicable reason it's passed by reference in structva_format. Sure enough when I fix up my local tree to pass by copy it all works (at least as far as I can tell:
most of the time the stack corruption passes unnoticed and minor disturbances can affect that. However, the type and size of theva_listis the same in reference and copy, so I think it's reasonably definitive).I'd really like one of our gcc experts to comment here because all of these are
builtin_types and functions, so why there's a problem is a mystery (translate: I don't understand enough of gcc to make sense of the source code), but the surmise would be that the builtins are taking some stack frame information from the source and, because it's a pointer not a copy, it's in the wrong frame.Assuming this turns out to be the problem, fixing it is going to be a real bugger because on most platforms, the type of
va_listis void * meaning you can't tell the difference at compile time between a copy and a reference, becausetypeof(void *)==typeof(void **), and this %pV is sprayed all over our code base.
Quoted 4 lines
We should probably also have the security experts look it over because any way of inducing stack frame corruption is potentially exploitable, although, in this case, I think all of the uses are internal so the user doesn't have the ability to influence the source data.
Would it be possible to create a relatively simple test case?
On 64-bit parisc, the va_list is built up in part by hppa_builtin_saveregs() in pa.c. It's stored in a region in the callers frame reserved for arguments.
I tend to think it's dangerous to pass a va_list by reference as in general the called function is free to use the incoming argument region for its own purposes after the incoming arguments have been copied. This might be the cause of the stack corruption you are seeing.
On parisc, the callee is responsible for copying incoming arguments if necessary. This is somewhat unusual...
Dave
--
John David Anglin [email protected]
Quoted 64 lines · John David Anglin
Quoted 62 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 22 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 21 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; }Quoted 9 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1-dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
OK, well this turned out to be one of the weirder fishing expeditions I've been on. The problem is this strange linux specific printf format flag %pV. The way to fix the bug is not to indirect the
dev_xxxprintks via %pV. What's happening is that in some circumstances, using %pV corrupts the stack.The reason seems to be that whoever came up with %pV didn't read the man pages carefully enough. In all the examples and use cases, the
va_listis passed by *copy* not by reference. For some inexplicable reason it's passed by reference in structva_format. Sure enough when I fix up my local tree to pass by copy it all works (at least as far as I can tell:
most of the time the stack corruption passes unnoticed and minor disturbances can affect that. However, the type and size of theva_listis the same in reference and copy, so I think it's reasonably definitive).I'd really like one of our gcc experts to comment here because all of these are
builtin_types and functions, so why there's a problem is a mystery (translate: I don't understand enough of gcc to make sense of the source code), but the surmise would be that the builtins are taking some stack frame information from the source and, because it's a pointer not a copy, it's in the wrong frame.Assuming this turns out to be the problem, fixing it is going to be a real bugger because on most platforms, the type of
va_listis void * meaning you can't tell the difference at compile time between a copy and a reference, becausetypeof(void *)==typeof(void **), and this %pV is sprayed all over our code base.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
We should probably also have the security experts look it over because any way of inducing stack frame corruption is potentially exploitable, although, in this case, I think all of the uses are internal so the user doesn't have the ability to influence the source data.
Would it be possible to create a relatively simple test case?
Unfortunately not. I'm no longer even sure this is the root cause: it reproduced again, even passing va_list by copy.
James
Quoted 27 lines
On 64-bit parisc, the
va_listis built up in part byhppa_builtin_saveregs()inpa.c.
It's stored in a region in the callers frame reserved for arguments.I tend to think it's dangerous to pass a
va_listby reference as in general the called
function is free to use the incoming argument region for its own purposes after
the incoming arguments have been copied. This might be the cause of the stack
corruption you are seeing.On parisc, the callee is responsible for copying incoming arguments if necessary.
This is somewhat unusual...Dave
--
John David Anglin [email protected]--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 71 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 70 lines · John David Anglin
Quoted 66 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 22 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 21 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; }Quoted 9 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1-dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
OK, well this turned out to be one of the weirder fishing expeditions I've been on. The problem is this strange linux specific printf format flag %pV. The way to fix the bug is not to indirect the
dev_xxxprintks via %pV. What's happening is that in some circumstances, using %pV corrupts the stack.The reason seems to be that whoever came up with %pV didn't read the man pages carefully enough. In all the examples and use cases, the
va_listis passed by *copy* not by reference. For some inexplicable reason it's passed by reference in structva_format. Sure enough when I fix up my local tree to pass by copy it all works (at least as far as I can tell:
most of the time the stack corruption passes unnoticed and minor disturbances can affect that. However, the type and size of theva_listis the same in reference and copy, so I think it's reasonably definitive).I'd really like one of our gcc experts to comment here because all of these are
builtin_types and functions, so why there's a problem is a mystery (translate: I don't understand enough of gcc to make sense of the source code), but the surmise would be that the builtins are taking some stack frame information from the source and, because it's a pointer not a copy, it's in the wrong frame.Assuming this turns out to be the problem, fixing it is going to be a real bugger because on most platforms, the type of
va_listis void * meaning you can't tell the difference at compile time between a copy and a reference, becausetypeof(void *)==typeof(void **), and this %pV is sprayed all over our code base.We should probably also have the security experts look it over because any way of inducing stack frame corruption is potentially exploitable, although, in this case, I think all of the uses are internal so the user doesn't have the ability to influence the source data.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Would it be possible to create a relatively simple test case?
Unfortunately not. I'm no longer even sure this is the root cause: it reproduced again, even passing
va_listby copy.
Is your "passing va_list by copy" using va_copy()?
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
On 64-bit parisc, the
va_listis built up in part byhppa_builtin_saveregs()inpa.c.
It's stored in a region in the callers frame reserved for arguments.I tend to think it's dangerous to pass a
va_listby reference as in general the called
function is free to use the incoming argument region for its own purposes after
the incoming arguments have been copied. This might be the cause of the stack
corruption you are seeing.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
On parisc, the callee is responsible for copying incoming arguments if necessary.
This is somewhat unusual...
How is va_copy() implemented on parisc?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
Quoted 72 lines · Peter Hurley
Quoted 71 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 70 lines · John David Anglin
Quoted 66 lines · James Bottomley
Quoted 22 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 21 lines · James Bottomley
From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
This is a partial revert of 2f2dafe (serial:
serial_core.c: printk replacement) which gets us booting again. The real problem seems to be the_emitpath in early boot. However, until we can root cause it, we need at least to get boot working.Fixes 2f2dafe77df2c78e189a9fa6b1879dffd06ae5a1Signed-off-by James Bottomley <[email protected]>---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +0
-0@@ -2164,7 +2164,9 @@ uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)break ; }Quoted 9 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) · line 2172
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c +3
-1-dev_info (port->dev,"%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , +printk (KERN_INFO "%s%s%s%d at %s (irq = %d, base_baud = %d) is a %s\n" , + port->dev ?dev_name (port->dev) :"" , + port->dev ?": " :"" , drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line, address, port->irq, port->uartclk /16 ,uart_type (port));Very odd, but I'll go queue it up, thanks.
OK, well this turned out to be one of the weirder fishing expeditions I've been on. The problem is this strange linux specific printf format flag %pV. The way to fix the bug is not to indirect the
dev_xxxprintks via %pV. What's happening is that in some circumstances, using %pV corrupts the stack.The reason seems to be that whoever came up with %pV didn't read the man pages carefully enough. In all the examples and use cases, the
va_listis passed by *copy* not by reference. For some inexplicable reason it's passed by reference in structva_format. Sure enough when I fix up my local tree to pass by copy it all works (at least as far as I can tell:
most of the time the stack corruption passes unnoticed and minor disturbances can affect that. However, the type and size of theva_listis the same in reference and copy, so I think it's reasonably definitive).I'd really like one of our gcc experts to comment here because all of these are
builtin_types and functions, so why there's a problem is a mystery (translate: I don't understand enough of gcc to make sense of the source code), but the surmise would be that the builtins are taking some stack frame information from the source and, because it's a pointer not a copy, it's in the wrong frame.Assuming this turns out to be the problem, fixing it is going to be a real bugger because on most platforms, the type of
va_listis void * meaning you can't tell the difference at compile time between a copy and a reference, becausetypeof(void *)==typeof(void **), and this %pV is sprayed all over our code base.We should probably also have the security experts look it over because any way of inducing stack frame corruption is potentially exploitable, although, in this case, I think all of the uses are internal so the user doesn't have the ability to influence the source data.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Would it be possible to create a relatively simple test case?
Unfortunately not. I'm no longer even sure this is the root cause: it reproduced again, even passing
va_listby copy.Is your "passing
va_listby copy" usingva_copy()?
No ... it refers to passing the va_list through the call frames before you get to va_copy. If you do man stdarg on most linux systems, it will give examples of this.
varargs is very stack and architecture dependent, so you have to be very careful to execute va_start/va_copy (code) va_end in the same call frame.
James