arm64/efi: handle potential failure to remap memory map
PATCH 1/1 arm64/efi: handle potential failure to remap memory map
When remapping the UEFI memory map using ioremap_cache(), we have to deal with potential failure. Note that, even if the common case is for ioremap_cache() to return the existing linear mapping of the memory map, we cannot rely on that to be always the case, e.g., in the presence of a mem= kernel parameter.
At the same time, remove a stale comment and move the memmap code together.
--- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +6 -4
@@ -229,19 +229,21 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)return -1 ; } - mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; -if (efi_runtime_disabled ()) {pr_info ("EFI runtime services will be disabled.\n" );return -1 ; }pr_info ("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n" ); -/* replace early memmap mapping with permanent mapping */ + + mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache ((phys_addr_t )memmap.phys_map, mapsize); +if (!memmap.map) { +pr_err ("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n" ); +return -1 ; + } memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; - efi.memmap = &memmap; efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
Mark Rutland
reviewerPATCH 1/1 arm64/efi: handle potential failure to remap memory map
Quoted 10 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
When remapping the UEFI memory map using
ioremap_cache(), we have to deal with potential failure. Note that, even if the common case is forioremap_cache()to return the existing linear mapping of the memory map, we cannot rely on that to be always the case, e.g., in the presence of a mem= kernel parameter.At the same time, remove a stale comment and move the memmap code together.
Signed-off-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
This should probably be picked up before my mem= patch, which I will be resending shortly. I'll mention that when posting.
I guess Catalin should pick this up given the other portions are in the arm64 tree, and this falls under arch/arm64.
Thanks,
Mark.
Quoted 38 lines
--- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +6
-4@@ -229,19 +229,21 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)return -1 ; } - mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; -if (efi_runtime_disabled ()) {pr_info ("EFI runtime services will be disabled.\n" );return -1 ; }pr_info ("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n" ); -/* replace early memmap mapping with permanent mapping */ + + mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache ((phys_addr_t )memmap.phys_map, mapsize); +if (!memmap.map) { +pr_err ("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n" ); +return -1 ; + } memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; - efi.memmap = &memmap; efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table,Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
PATCH 1/1 arm64/efi: handle potential failure to remap memory map
Quoted 12 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 10 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
When remapping the UEFI memory map using
ioremap_cache(), we have to deal with potential failure. Note that, even if the common case is forioremap_cache()to return the existing linear mapping of the memory map, we cannot rely on that to be always the case, e.g., in the presence of a mem= kernel parameter.At the same time, remove a stale comment and move the memmap code together.
Signed-off-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Acked-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>This should probably be picked up before my mem= patch, which I will be resending shortly. I'll mention that when posting.
I guess Catalin should pick this up given the other portions are in the arm64 tree, and this falls under
arch/arm64.
I picked both up. Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Catalin
PATCH 1/1 arm64/efi: handle potential failure to remap memory map
In reply to Ard BiesheuvelQuoted 34 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
When remapping the UEFI memory map using
ioremap_cache(), we have to deal with potential failure. Note that, even if the common case is forioremap_cache()to return the existing linear mapping of the memory map, we cannot rely on that to be always the case, e.g., in the presence of a mem= kernel parameter.At the same time, remove a stale comment and move the memmap code together.
Signed-off-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>--- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +2
-3@@ -229,19 +229,21 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)return -1 ; } - mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; -if (efi_runtime_disabled ()) {pr_info ("EFI runtime services will be disabled.\n" );return -1 ; }pr_info ("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n" ); -/* replace early memmap mapping with permanent mapping */ + + mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache((phys_addr_t)memmap.phys_map,
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void) · line 249
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +4
-1mapsize); +if (!memmap.map) { +pr_err ("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n" ); +return -1 ; + } memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; - efi.memmap = &memmap; efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table,
Somewhat unrelated but we should unmap memmap.map if the efi.systab mapping fails.