Skip to contentSkip to conversation

package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11

PATCH New Karoly Kasza 2 participants 3 messages Mar 29, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11

---
 package/ccache/ccache.mk |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/ccache/ccache.mk +1 -1
index 270ea4b..893b6ae 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.8
+CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.11
 CCACHE_SITE = http://samba.org/ftp/ccache
 CCACHE_SOURCE = ccache-$(CCACHE_VERSION).tar.xz
 CCACHE_LICENSE = GPLv3+, others
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11

Hi all,

based on the release notes at ccache.samba.org, there are only bugfix releases since 3.1.x (hence the above patch should be safe to apply), but the 3.2.x line are already exists. Should we start moving on to that major version?

Regards,
Karoly

package/ccache/ccache.mk line 7

Quoted 3 lines
package/ccache/ccache.mk +1 -1
-CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.8
+CCACHE_VERSION = 3.1.11

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150329/8036e84a/attachment.html>

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 package/ccache: bump version to 3.1.11

In reply to Karoly Kasza

Dear Karoly Kasza,

Quoted 5 lines · Karoly Kasza
---
 package/ccache/ccache.mk |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks. If you feel like it, sending a patch adding a hash file would be good.

Also, there is still quite a lot of things to fix to get our ccache support to a sane state. If you have some time, you could look at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/287383/, especially the comments made by Arnout, and try to improve the ccache support based on that.

Thanks a lot!

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com