3.19.7-stable review

Quoted 60 lines · Thomas Backlund

Den 02.05.2015 22:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman skrev:

Quoted 34 lines

3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>

commit afb7718016fcb0370ac29a83b2839c78b76c2960 upstream.

While originally only being intended for outgoing traffic, commit a00e76349f35 ("netfilter: x_tables: allow to use cgroup match for LOCAL_IN nf hooks") enabled xt_cgroups for the NF_INET_LOCAL_IN hook as well, in order to allow for nfacct accounting.

Besides being currently limited to early demuxes only, commit a00e76349f35 forgot to add a check if we deal with full sockets, i.e. in this case not with time wait sockets. TCP time wait sockets do not have the same memory layout as full sockets, a lower memory footprint and consequently also don't have a sk_classid member; probing for sk_classid member there could potentially lead to a crash.

Fixes a00e76349f35 ("netfilter: x_tables: allow to use cgroup match for LOCAL_IN nf hooks")

Cc Alexey Perevalov <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
  net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c cgroup_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, str · line 45

Quoted 8 lines

net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c +1 -1

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ cgroup_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, str
  {
  	const struct xt_cgroup_info *info = par->matchinfo;
 
-	if (skb->sk == NULL)
+	if (skb->sk == NULL || !sk_fullsock(skb->sk))
  		return false;
 
  	return (info->id == skb->sk->sk_classid) ^ info->invert;

This one breaks the build with:

net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_mt':
net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'sk_fullsock' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

In order to fix it, you also need to add:

From 1d0ab253872cdd3d8e7913f59c266c7fd01771d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:12:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] net: add sk_fullsock() helper

which in turn needs this one:

Quoted 4 lines

From 10feb428a5045d5eb18a5d755fbb8f0cc9645626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:44:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] inet: add TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state

I've just dropped the patch, thanks for letting me know, odd that my build tests missed it.

Quoted 9 lines

Quoted 9 lines

In order to fix it, you also need to add:

From 1d0ab253872cdd3d8e7913f59c266c7fd01771d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:12:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] net: add sk_fullsock() helper

which in turn needs this one:

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 4 lines

From 10feb428a5045d5eb18a5d755fbb8f0cc9645626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:44:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] inet: add TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state

I've just dropped the patch, thanks for letting me know, odd that my build tests missed it.

If you're nevertheless interested in this fix, you could use this version, which should apply/build just fine:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455546/

I believe Pablo usually sends netfilter patches in bundles to you.

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build error:

net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_mt':
net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'sk_fullsock'

3.19.y and 4.0.y are being rebuilt right mow, so maybe you fixed that problem as well as the same failure in 4.0.y. I'll resend my report for 3.19.y and wait with the report for 4.0.y until after the rebuild is complete.

Bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label: Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.

Quoted 3 lines · Guenter Roeck

Bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label: Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.

Btw, since you do these bisections (great!), it would be doubly useful if you then (automatically?) would add the people involved with the particular commit to the cc. At least the ones that signed off and/or acked the commit (that jump-label commit has a lot of people on the cc, but if they never _responded_ to the cc, I'm not sure that they should necessarily be disturbed).

The people who signed off on it hopefully are aware of any dependencies for that commit, in ways that Greg himself (or the stable team) may not be.

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

	total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

	total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

---
powerpc:

include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages:
include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: enum' include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is ,'

As mentioned earlier, bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label:
Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.'.

Quoted 55 lines · Guenter Roeck

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

	total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

	total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

---
powerpc:

Quoted 6 lines

include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages:
include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: enum' include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is ,'

As mentioned earlier, bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label:
Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.'.

That commit might be missing its dependencies:

c0ccf6f99e3a jump_label: Allow jump labels to be used in assembly 55dd0df781e5 jump_label: Allow asm/jump_label.h to be included in assembly

But I don't think the PowerPC commit should be in -stable to begin with, just like the two core patches are not.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

     total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

     total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

Quoted 49 lines · Guenter Roeck

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

    total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

    total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Quoted 3 lines

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

The latest 3.19.y still fails to build mips images with this error. A quick test suggests that reverting the patch appears to fix the problem.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

    total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

    total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

Quoted 44 lines · Guenter Roeck

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

    total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

    total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

Quoted 8 lines

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

I guess this is a fallout caused by the missing dependencies.

Patches

- [PATCH] MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned" (eeb538950367e3966cbf0237ab1a1dc30e059818)

- [PATCH] MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while (3563c32d6532ece53c9dd8905a8e41983ef9952f)

couldn't be applied to 3.19 stable according to the emails I got from Greg, so the third one in that series (aka the offending one) is now broken.

Please remove 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA' (6eae35485b26f9e51ab896eb8a936bed9908fdf6)

I will create a suitable 3.19 backport for that patchset.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Take two:

Build results:

	total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13

Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
powerpc:defconfig
powerpc:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:

	total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8

Failed tests:
mips:mips_malta_defconfig
mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig

---
Error logs:

mips:

arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'

Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA'.

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Quoted 3 lines

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

-rc2 is out now that should work properly:

kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz

Quoted 11 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Quoted 3 lines

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

      kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

-rc2 is out now that should work properly:

        kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Locally I've reverted c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce on top of v3.19.7 and confirmed that my at91-sama5d3_xplained boots that kernel successfully[4].

Quoted 5 lines · Tyler Baker

Locally I've reverted c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce on top of v3.19.7 and confirmed that my at91-sama5d3_xplained boots that kernel successfully[4].

And that makes sense as commit 1c8e600440c7 ("clk: Add rate constraints to clocks") isn't in 3.19. This commit changes the signature of .determine_rate to include the 2 extra args present in at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate() after commit c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce.

From 73a2cf633be185570c7df689afedaebed86d8451 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Luis, Tyler,

Quoted 7 lines · On Thu, 7 May 2015 09:55:53 +0100 Luis Henriques…

Quoted 5 lines · Tyler Baker

Locally I've reverted c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce on top of v3.19.7 and confirmed that my at91-sama5d3_xplained boots that kernel successfully[4].

Quoted 5 lines

And that makes sense as commit 1c8e600440c7 ("clk: Add rate constraints to clocks") isn't in 3.19. This commit changes the signature of .determine_rate to include the 2 extra args present in at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate() after commit c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce.

Oops, indeed. I shouldn't have tagged this commit for stable. Below is a patch fixing this problem.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- >8 --
From 73a2cf633be185570c7df689afedaebed86d8451 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Subject: [PATCH] clk: at91: usb: fix determine_rate prototype

Commit c67881fc890916206e723329e774391c6ed354ce is a backport of 0b67c43ce36a9964f1d5e3f973ee19eefd3f9f8f upstream commit, fixing a bug on clk rate change propagation.
But in 4.0 ->determine_rate() prototype has changed, thus introducing a prototype mismatch when applying it on 3.19.

Signed-off-by Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c +0 -3

index 0b7c3e8..0283a57 100644
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 
 static long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
                                              unsigned long rate,
-                                             unsigned long min_rate,
-                                             unsigned long max_rate,
                                              unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
                                              struct clk_hw **best_parent_hw)
 {
--

1.9.1

From [email protected] Fri May 8 13:05:22 2015

Hi Greg,

Quoted 13 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

Quoted 11 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

       kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz

and the diffstat can be found below.

Quoted 3 lines

-rc2 is out now that should work properly:

         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz

The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot bisection which yielded...

Quoted 28 lines · Tyler Baker

Hi Greg,

Quoted 21 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

Quoted 6 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Quoted 7 lines

Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz and the diffstat can be found below.

-rc2 is out now that should work properly:

kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz

Quoted 4 lines

The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot bisection which yielded...

Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ?

Guenter