mtd: diskonchip: remove two-phase partitioning / registration
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/4 mtd: diskonchip: remove two-phase partitioning / registration
It is a Bad Idea (TM) to call mtd_device_register() or mtd_device_parse_register() twice on the same master MTD. Among other things, it makes partition overrides (e.g., cmdlinepart) much more difficult.
Since commit 727dc612c46b ("mtd: part: Create the master device node when partitioned"), we now have a config option that accomplishes the same purpose as the double-registration done in diskonchip.c -- it forces the master MTD to *always* be registered, while partitions may optionally show up in addition. Eventually, we might like to make CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER into the default, but this could be disruptive to user-space expectations of MTD numbering, so we'll take that slowly.
---
Not tested, as I don't have the hardware
drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c +2 -8
@@ -1301,10 +1301,7 @@ static int __init nftl_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)if (ret)return ret; -mtd_device_register (mtd,NULL ,0 ); -if (!no_autopart) -mtd_device_register (mtd, parts, numparts); -return 0 ; +return mtd_device_register (mtd, parts, no_autopart ?0 : numparts); }static int __init inftl_scan_bbt (struct mtd_info *mtd)
@@ -1358,10 +1355,7 @@ static int __init inftl_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)autopartitioning, but I want to give it more thought. */ if (!numparts)return -EIO ; -mtd_device_register (mtd,NULL ,0 ); -if (!no_autopart) -mtd_device_register (mtd, parts, numparts); -return 0 ; +return mtd_device_register (mtd, parts, no_autopart ?0 : numparts); }static inline int __init doc2000_init (struct mtd_info *mtd)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 2/4 mtd: propagate error codes from add_mtd_device()
It makes more sense to return error statuses, not 1/0.
At the same time, note a few places where error handling is not currently done.
--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 18 +++++++++++------- drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +11 -7
@@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ static int mtd_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *n, unsigned long state,* * Add a device to the list of MTD devices present in the system, and * notify each currently active MTD 'user' of its arrival. Returns -* zero on success or 1 on failure, which currently will only happen -* if there is insufficient memory or a sysfs error. +* zero on success or non-zero on failure. */ int add_mtd_device (struct mtd_info *mtd)
@@ -394,8 +393,10 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)mutex_lock (&mtd_table_mutex); i =idr_alloc (&mtd_idr, mtd,0 ,0 ,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (i <0 ) +if (i <0 ) { + error = i; goto fail_locked; + } mtd->index = i; mtd->usecount =0 ;
@@ -424,6 +425,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: unlock failed, writes may not work\n" , mtd->name); +/* Ignore unlock failures? */ + error =0 ; }/* Caller should have set dev.parent to match the
@@ -434,7 +437,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) mtd->dev.devt =MTD_DEVT (i);dev_set_name (&mtd->dev,"mtd%d" , i);dev_set_drvdata (&mtd->dev, mtd); -if (device_register (&mtd->dev) !=0 ) + error =device_register (&mtd->dev); +if (error) goto fail_added; device_create(&mtd_class, mtd->dev.parent, MTD_DEVT(i) + 1, NULL,
@@ -458,7 +462,7 @@ fail_added:idr_remove (&mtd_idr, i); fail_locked:mutex_unlock (&mtd_table_mutex); -return 1 ; +return error; }/**
@@ -514,8 +518,8 @@ static int mtd_add_device_partitions(struct mtd_info *mtd,if (nbparts ==0 ||IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER )) { ret =add_mtd_device (mtd); -if (ret ==1 ) -return -ENODEV ; +if (ret) +return ret; }if (nbparts >0 ) {
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c +2 -0
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ int mtd_add_partition(struct mtd_info *master, const char *name,list_add (&new->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex); +/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&new->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (new);
@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,list_add (&slave->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex); +/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&slave->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (slave);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: propagate error codes from add_mtd_device()
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 90 lines
It makes more sense to return error statuses, not 1/0.
At the same time, note a few places where error handling is not currently done.
Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 18 +++++++++++------- drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +11
-7@@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ static int mtd_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *n, unsigned long state,* * Add a device to the list of MTD devices present in the system, and * notify each currently active MTD 'user' of its arrival. Returns -* zero on success or 1 on failure, which currently will only happen -* if there is insufficient memory or a sysfs error. +* zero on success or non-zero on failure. */ int add_mtd_device (struct mtd_info *mtd)@@ -394,8 +393,10 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)mutex_lock (&mtd_table_mutex); i =idr_alloc (&mtd_idr, mtd,0 ,0 ,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (i <0 ) +if (i <0 ) { + error = i; goto fail_locked; + } mtd->index = i; mtd->usecount =0 ;@@ -424,6 +425,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: unlock failed, writes may not work\n" , mtd->name); +/* Ignore unlock failures? */ + error =0 ; }/* Caller should have set dev.parent to match the @@ -434,7 +437,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) mtd->dev.devt =MTD_DEVT (i);dev_set_name (&mtd->dev,"mtd%d" , i);dev_set_drvdata (&mtd->dev, mtd); -if (device_register (&mtd->dev) !=0 ) + error =device_register (&mtd->dev); +if (error) goto fail_added; device_create(&mtd_class, mtd->dev.parent, MTD_DEVT(i) + 1, NULL,@@ -458,7 +462,7 @@ fail_added:idr_remove (&mtd_idr, i); fail_locked:mutex_unlock (&mtd_table_mutex); -return 1 ; +return error; }/** @@ -514,8 +518,8 @@ static int mtd_add_device_partitions(struct mtd_info *mtd,if (nbparts ==0 ||IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER )) { ret =add_mtd_device (mtd); -if (ret ==1 ) -return -ENODEV ; +if (ret) +return ret; }if (nbparts >0 ) {drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c +1
-0@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ int mtd_add_partition(struct mtd_info *master, const char *name,list_add (&new->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex); +/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&new->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (new);
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master, · line 678
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c +1
-0@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,list_add (&slave->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex); +/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&slave->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (slave);
Do you want this FIXME's have fixed in the 4.2 merge window? Adding new FIXME's is IMHO not nice.
Thanks,
//richard
Re: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: propagate error codes from add_mtd_device()
Quoted 93 lines · Richard Weinberger
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 92 lines
It makes more sense to return error statuses, not 1/0.
At the same time, note a few places where error handling is not currently done.
Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 18 +++++++++++------- drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +11
-7@@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ static int mtd_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *n, unsigned long state,* * Add a device to the list of MTD devices present in the system, and * notify each currently active MTD 'user' of its arrival. Returns -* zero on success or 1 on failure, which currently will only happen -* if there is insufficient memory or a sysfs error. +* zero on success or non-zero on failure. */ int add_mtd_device (struct mtd_info *mtd)@@ -394,8 +393,10 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)mutex_lock (&mtd_table_mutex); i =idr_alloc (&mtd_idr, mtd,0 ,0 ,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (i <0 ) +if (i <0 ) { + error = i; goto fail_locked; + } mtd->index = i; mtd->usecount =0 ;@@ -424,6 +425,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: unlock failed, writes may not work\n" , mtd->name); +/* Ignore unlock failures? */ + error =0 ; }/* Caller should have set dev.parent to match the @@ -434,7 +437,8 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) mtd->dev.devt =MTD_DEVT (i);dev_set_name (&mtd->dev,"mtd%d" , i);dev_set_drvdata (&mtd->dev, mtd); -if (device_register (&mtd->dev) !=0 ) + error =device_register (&mtd->dev); +if (error) goto fail_added; device_create(&mtd_class, mtd->dev.parent, MTD_DEVT(i) + 1, NULL,@@ -458,7 +462,7 @@ fail_added:idr_remove (&mtd_idr, i); fail_locked:mutex_unlock (&mtd_table_mutex); -return 1 ; +return error; }/** @@ -514,8 +518,8 @@ static int mtd_add_device_partitions(struct mtd_info *mtd,if (nbparts ==0 ||IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER )) { ret =add_mtd_device (mtd); -if (ret ==1 ) -return -ENODEV ; +if (ret) +return ret; }if (nbparts >0 ) {drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c +1
-0@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ int mtd_add_partition(struct mtd_info *master, const char *name,list_add (&new->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex); +/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&new->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (new);@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,list_add (&slave->list, &mtd_partitions);mutex_unlock (&mtd_partitions_mutex);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master, · line 678
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c +1
-0+/* FIXME: handle errors */ add_mtd_device (&slave->mtd);mtd_add_partition_attrs (slave);Do you want this FIXME's have fixed in the 4.2 merge window? Adding new FIXME's is IMHO not nice.
Not sure. I really wasn't planning on it, and I admit this was a little lazy of me.
Now, we're really in no worse of a condition regarding error-handling, as this was already ignoring error-handling, and to drop this patch entirely actually masks another class of bugs. But I am adding a new return condition that would make this deficiency more important in the next patches...
So which of these options do you like best?
1. take this patch as-is and
a. fix them in the 4.2 cycle
b. fix them "sometime" (i.e., never)
2. take this patch without the FIXME's
3. don't take this patch until the FIXME's are resolved
Personally, I guess I'd lean toward #2, and then don't take the next patches that add new error return cases until I can work out all the other deficient code paths.
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Brian
PATCH 3/4 mtd: fixup corner case error handling in mtd_device_parse_register()
In reply to Brian NorrisSince commit 3efe41be224c ("mtd: implement common reboot notifier boilerplate"), we might try to register a reboot notifier for an MTD that failed to register. Let's avoid this by making the error path clearer.
--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +9 -2
@@ -579,9 +579,15 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,else ret = nr_parts; } +/* Didn't come up with either parsed OR fallback partitions */ +if (ret <0 ) { +pr_info ("mtd: failed to find partitions\n" ); + goto out; + } -if (ret >=0 ) - ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); + ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); +if (ret) + goto out;/* * FIXME: some drivers unfortunately call this function more than once.
@@ -596,6 +602,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier); } +out:kfree (real_parts);return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd: fixup corner case error handling in mtd_device_parse_register()
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 33 lines
Since commit
3efe41be224c("mtd: implement common reboot notifier boilerplate"), we might try to register a reboot notifier for an MTD that failed to register. Let's avoid this by making the error path clearer.Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +8
-2@@ -579,9 +579,15 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,else ret = nr_parts; } +/* Didn't come up with either parsed OR fallback partitions */ +if (ret <0 ) { +pr_info ("mtd: failed to find partitions\n" ); + goto out; + } -if (ret >=0 ) - ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); + ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); +if (ret) + goto out;/* * FIXME: some drivers unfortunately call this function more than once.
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types, · line 608
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +1
-0@@ -596,6 +602,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier); } +out:kfree (real_parts);return ret; }
Thanks,
//richard
Re: [PATCH 3/4] mtd: fixup corner case error handling in mtd_device_parse_register()
Quoted 37 lines · Richard Weinberger
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 36 lines
Since commit
3efe41be224c("mtd: implement common reboot notifier boilerplate"), we might try to register a reboot notifier for an MTD that failed to register. Let's avoid this by making the error path clearer.Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +8
-2@@ -579,9 +579,15 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,else ret = nr_parts; } +/* Didn't come up with either parsed OR fallback partitions */ +if (ret <0 ) { +pr_info ("mtd: failed to find partitions\n" ); + goto out; + } -if (ret >=0 ) - ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); + ret =mtd_add_device_partitions (mtd, real_parts, ret); +if (ret) + goto out;/* * FIXME: some drivers unfortunately call this function more than once. @@ -596,6 +602,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier); }
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types, · line 608
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +1
-0+out:kfree (real_parts);return ret; }Reviewed-by Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Not sure why I left this one; applied to l2-mtd.git
PATCH 4/4 mtd: warn when registering the same master many times
In reply to Brian NorrisWhen CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y, it is fatal to call mtd_device_parse_register() twice on the same MTD, as we try to register the same device/kobject multipile times.
When CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=n, calling mtd_device_parse_register() is more of just a nuisance, as we can mostly navigate around any conflicting actions.
But anyway, doing so is a Bad Thing (TM), and we should complain loudly for any drivers that try to do this.
--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +9 -0
@@ -387,6 +387,14 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)struct mtd_notifier *not;int i, error; +/* +* May occur, for instance, on buggy drivers which call +* mtd_device_parse_register() multiple times on the same master MTD, +* especially with CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y. +*/ +if (WARN (mtd->backing_dev_info,"MTD already registered\n" )) +return -EEXIST ; + mtd->backing_dev_info = &mtd_bdi;BUG_ON (mtd->writesize ==0 );
@@ -597,6 +605,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,* does cause problems with parse_mtd_partitions() above (e.g., * cmdlineparts will register partitions more than once). */ +WARN (mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call,"MTD already registered\n" );if (mtd->_reboot && !mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call) { mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call = mtd_reboot_notifier;register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: warn when registering the same master many times
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 36 lines
When
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y, it is fatal to callmtd_device_parse_register()twice on the same MTD, as we try to register the same device/kobject multipile times.When
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=n, callingmtd_device_parse_register()is more of just a nuisance, as we can mostly navigate around any conflicting actions.But anyway, doing so is a Bad Thing (TM), and we should complain loudly for any drivers that try to do this.
Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +8
-0@@ -387,6 +387,14 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)struct mtd_notifier *not;int i, error; +/* +* May occur, for instance, on buggy drivers which call +* mtd_device_parse_register() multiple times on the same master MTD, +* especially with CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y. +*/ +if (WARN (mtd->backing_dev_info,"MTD already registered\n" )) +return -EEXIST ; + mtd->backing_dev_info = &mtd_bdi;BUG_ON (mtd->writesize ==0 );
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types, · line 611
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +1
-0@@ -597,6 +605,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,* does cause problems with parse_mtd_partitions() above (e.g., * cmdlineparts will register partitions more than once). */ +WARN (mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call,"MTD already registered\n" );if (mtd->_reboot && !mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call) { mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call = mtd_reboot_notifier;register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier);
One minor nit, IMHO WARN_ONCE() would make more sense.
Beside of that:
Thanks,
//richard
Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: warn when registering the same master many times
Quoted 47 lines · Richard Weinberger
Am 02.06.2015 um 01:17 schrieb Brian Norris:
Quoted 36 lines
When
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y, it is fatal to callmtd_device_parse_register()twice on the same MTD, as we try to register the same device/kobject multipile times.When
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=n, callingmtd_device_parse_register()is more of just a nuisance, as we can mostly navigate around any conflicting actions.But anyway, doing so is a Bad Thing (TM), and we should complain loudly for any drivers that try to do this.
Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>--- drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +8
-0@@ -387,6 +387,14 @@ int add_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)struct mtd_notifier *not;int i, error; +/* +* May occur, for instance, on buggy drivers which call +* mtd_device_parse_register() multiple times on the same master MTD, +* especially with CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER=y. +*/ +if (WARN (mtd->backing_dev_info,"MTD already registered\n" )) +return -EEXIST ; + mtd->backing_dev_info = &mtd_bdi;BUG_ON (mtd->writesize ==0 );drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types, · line 611
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c +1
-0@@ -597,6 +605,7 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char * const *types,* does cause problems with parse_mtd_partitions() above (e.g., * cmdlineparts will register partitions more than once). */ +WARN (mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call,"MTD already registered\n" );if (mtd->_reboot && !mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call) { mtd->reboot_notifier.notifier_call = mtd_reboot_notifier;register_reboot_notifier (&mtd->reboot_notifier);One minor nit, IMHO
WARN_ONCE()would make more sense.
Quoted 2 lines
Beside of that:
Reviewed-by Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Changed to WARN_ONCE() and applied
Quoted 14 lines · Brian Norris
It is a Bad Idea (TM) to call
mtd_device_register()ormtd_device_parse_register()twice on the same master MTD. Among other things, it makes partition overrides (e.g., cmdlinepart) much more difficult.Since commit
727dc612c46b("mtd: part: Create the master device node when partitioned"), we now have a config option that accomplishes the same purpose as the double-registration done indiskonchip.c-- it forces the master MTD to *always* be registered, while partitions may optionally show up in addition. Eventually, we might like to makeCONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTERinto the default, but this could be disruptive to user-space expectations of MTD numbering, so we'll take that slowly.
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Brian Norris <[email protected]>Cc Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>Cc Alexander Shiyan <[email protected]>
Pushed patch 1 and 2, minus the FIXME's.