gnttab: Improve scaleability
v14 cover gnttab: Improve scaleability
Performance results for aggregate intrahost network throughput (between 20 VM pairs, with 16 dom0 VCPUs) show substantial improvements.
Throughput/Gbit/s
Base 9.7
Split locks 25.8
Split locks 42.9
+ per-VCPU maptrack lists
v14:
* When adding a new frame, use first entry and don't add it to free list.
* v -> curr, d -> currd and const (where appropriate).
* Use get_random().
* Check for NULL currd->vcpu[i].
v13:
* When adding new frames, update v->maptrack_head last.
* Each VCPU no longer gets a reserved number of frames -- they're allocated first-come, first-served.
* Use original gt->maptrack_limit (instead of gt->maptrack_pages).
* Steal an extra entry for the sentinel if a VCPU's free list is unitialized.
v12:
* Check for same refs in __gnttab_swap_grant_ref() to avoid deadlock.
* Assert local grant table lock is held in mapcount().
* Document that maptrack_lock is only for the free list.
* Document locking needed for maptrack entries (the active entry
lock).
* Try and steal maptrack entries if a VCPU runs out (RFC).
v11:
* Fix exists test in gnttab_map_exists().
* Call gnttab_need_iommu_mapping() once for each lock/unlock.
* Take active entry lock in gnttab_transfer().
* Use read_atomic() when checking maptrack flags for validity (note:
all other reads of map->flags are either after it is validated as
stable or protected by the active entry lock and thus don't need
read_atomic()). * Add comment to double_gt_lock().
* Allocate maptrack array with vzalloc() since it may be >1 page.
v10:
* Reduce scope of act in grant_map_exists().
* Make unlock sequence in error paths consistent in
__acquire_grant_for_copy().
* gnt_unlock_out -> to gt_unlock_out in __acquire_grant_for_copy().
* In gnttab_map_grant_ref(), keep double lock around maptrack update if gnttab_need_iommu_mapping(). Use a wmb(), otherwise.
* Divide max_maptrack_frames evenly amongst the VCPUs.
* Increase default max_maptrack_frames to compensate.
v9:
* Refactor the locking patches into three commits:
1. Add per-active entry locking.
2. Add maptrack_lock.
3. Make the grant table lock a read-write lock.
* Keep the double lock around IOMMU updates, but adjust their scope to only the IOMMU updates.
v8:
* Misc locking fixes.
* Use read/write_atomic() in per-VCPU maptrack free list.
* Improve locking docs.
v7:
* Re-add grant table rwlock (locking was broken without it and the gains are minimal anyway).
* Remove unneeded locks from grant_table_destroy().
* Fix get_maptrack_handle() locking.
v6:
* Remove most uses of the grant table lock.
* Make the grant table lock a spin lock again (there were only writers left after the above)
* Add per-VCPU maptrack free lists.
v5:
* Addressed locking issue pointed out by Jan Beulich
* Fixed git rebase merge issue introduced in v4 (acquiring locking twice)
* Change for ()-loop in grant_map_exists
* Coding style fixes
v4:
* Coding style nits from Jan Beulich
* Fixup read locks pointed out by Jan Beulich
* renamed double_gt_(un)lock to double_maptrack_(un)lock per request from Jan Beulich
* Addressed ASSERT()'s from Jan Beulich
* Addressed locking issues in unmap_common pointed out by Jan Beulich
v3:
* Addressed gnttab_swap_grant_ref() comment from Andrew Cooper
v2:
* Add arm part per request from Julien Grall
David
PATCH v14 1/2 gnttab: use per-VCPU maptrack free lists
From: Malcolm Crossley <[email protected]>
Performance analysis of aggregate network throughput with many VMs shows that performance is signficantly limited by contention on the maptrack lock when obtaining/releasing maptrack handles from the free list.
Instead of a single free list use a per-VCPU list. This avoids any contention when obtaining a handle. Handles must be released back to their original list and since this may occur on a different VCPU there is some contention on the destination VCPU's free list tail pointer (but this is much better than a per-domain lock).
Increase the default maximum number of maptrack frames by 4 times
because: a) struct grant_mapping is now 16 bytes (instead of 8); and
b) a guest may not evenly distribute all the grant map operations across the VCPUs (meaning some VCPUs need more maptrack entries than others).
---
v14:
- When adding a new frame, use first entry and don't add it to free list.
- v -> curr and d -> currd (where appropriate).
v13:
- When adding new frames, update v->maptrack_head last.
- Each VCPU no longer gets a reserved number of frames -- they're allocated first-come, first-served.
- Use original gt->maptrack_limit (instead of gt->maptrack_pages).
v11:
- Allocate maptrack array with vzalloc() since it may be >1 page.
v10:
- Divide max_maptrack_frames evenly amongst the VCPUs.
- Increase default max_maptrack_frames to compensate.
--- xen/common/grant_table.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- xen/include/xen/grant_table.h | 3 +- xen/include/xen/sched.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
xen/common/grant_table.c +87 -45
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@#include <xen/iommu.h> #include <xen/paging.h> #include <xen/keyhandler.h> +#include <xen/vmap.h> #include <xsm/xsm.h> #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ integer_param("gnttab_max_frames", max_grant_frames);* New options allow to set max_maptrack_frames and * map_grant_table_frames independently. */ -#define DEFAULT_MAX_MAPTRACK_FRAMES 256 +#define DEFAULT_MAX_MAPTRACK_FRAMES 1024static unsigned int __read_mostly max_maptrack_frames;integer_param ("gnttab_max_maptrack_frames" , max_maptrack_frames);
@@ -121,6 +122,8 @@ struct grant_mapping {u32 ref;/* grant ref */ u16 flags;/* 0-4: GNTMAP_* ; 5-15: unused */ domid_t domid;/* granting domain */ +u32 vcpu;/* vcpu which created the grant mapping */ +u32 pad;/* round size to a power of 2 */ };#define MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct grant_mapping))
@@ -289,62 +292,103 @@ double_gt_unlock(struct grant_table *lgt, struct grant_table *rgt)static inline int __get_maptrack_handle ( -struct grant_table *t) +struct grant_table *t, +struct vcpu *v) { -unsigned int h; -if (unlikely ((h = t->maptrack_head) ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) +unsigned int head, next; + +/* No maptrack pages allocated for this VCPU yet? */ + head = v->maptrack_head; +if (unlikely (head ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) +return -1 ; + +/* +* Always keep one entry in the free list to make it easier to add +* free entries to the tail. +*/ + next =read_atomic (&maptrack_entry (t, head).ref); +if (unlikely (next ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) )return -1 ; - t->maptrack_head =maptrack_entry (t, h).ref; -return h; + + v->maptrack_head = next; + +return head; }static inline void put_maptrack_handle (struct grant_table *t,int handle) { -spin_lock (&t->maptrack_lock); -maptrack_entry (t, handle).ref = t->maptrack_head; - t->maptrack_head = handle; -spin_unlock (&t->maptrack_lock); +struct domain *currd = current->domain; +struct vcpu *v; +unsigned int prev_tail, cur_tail; + +/* 1. Set entry to be a tail. */ +maptrack_entry (t, handle).ref =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + +/* 2. Add entry to the tail of the list on the original VCPU. */ + v = currd->vcpu[maptrack_entry (t,handle).vcpu]; + + cur_tail =read_atomic (&v->maptrack_tail); +do { + prev_tail = cur_tail; + cur_tail =cmpxchg (&v->maptrack_tail, prev_tail, handle); + }while ( cur_tail != prev_tail ); + +/* 3. Update the old tail entry to point to the new entry. */ +write_atomic (&maptrack_entry (t, prev_tail).ref, handle); }static inline int get_maptrack_handle (struct grant_table *lgt) { +struct vcpu *curr = current;int i;grant_handle_t handle;struct grant_mapping *new_mt; -unsigned int new_mt_limit, nr_frames; + + handle =__get_maptrack_handle (lgt, curr); +if (likely (handle !=-1 ) ) +return handle;spin_lock (&lgt->maptrack_lock); -while (unlikely ((handle =__get_maptrack_handle (lgt)) ==-1 ) ) +if (nr_maptrack_frames (lgt) >= max_maptrack_frames ) { - nr_frames =nr_maptrack_frames (lgt); -if ( nr_frames >= max_maptrack_frames ) -break ; +spin_unlock (&lgt->maptrack_lock); +return -1 ; + } - new_mt =alloc_xenheap_page (); -if ( !new_mt ) -break ; + new_mt =alloc_xenheap_page (); +if ( !new_mt ) + { +spin_unlock (&lgt->maptrack_lock); +return -1 ; + } +clear_page (new_mt); -clear_page (new_mt); +/* +* Use the first new entry and add the remaining entries to the +* head of the free list. +*/ + handle = lgt->maptrack_limit; - new_mt_limit = lgt->maptrack_limit +MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ; +for ( i =0 ; i <MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ; i++ ) + { + new_mt[i].ref = handle + i +1 ; + new_mt[i].vcpu = curr->vcpu_id; + } + new_mt[i -1 ].ref = curr->maptrack_head; -for ( i =1 ; i <MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ; i++ ) - new_mt[i -1 ].ref = lgt->maptrack_limit + i; - new_mt[i -1 ].ref = lgt->maptrack_head; - lgt->maptrack_head = lgt->maptrack_limit; +/* Set tail directly if this is the first page for this VCPU. */ +if ( curr->maptrack_tail ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) + curr->maptrack_tail = handle +MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE -1 ; - lgt->maptrack[nr_frames] = new_mt; -smp_wmb (); - lgt->maptrack_limit = new_mt_limit; + curr->maptrack_head = handle +1 ; -gdprintk (XENLOG_INFO ,"Increased maptrack size to %u frames\n" , - nr_frames +1 ); - } + lgt->maptrack[nr_maptrack_frames (lgt)] = new_mt; + lgt->maptrack_limit +=MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ;spin_unlock (&lgt->maptrack_lock);
@@ -1433,6 +1477,7 @@ gnttab_setup_table(struct gnttab_setup_table op;struct domain *d;struct grant_table *gt; +struct vcpu *v;int i;xen_pfn_t gmfn;
@@ -1474,6 +1519,17 @@ gnttab_setup_table( gt = d->grant_table;write_lock (>->lock); +/* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ + gt->maptrack =vzalloc (max_maptrack_frames *sizeof (*gt->maptrack)); +if ( gt->maptrack ==NULL ) + goto out3; +for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) + { + v->maptrack_head =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + v->maptrack_tail =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + } + gt->maptrack_limit =0 ; +if ( gt->gt_version ==0 ) gt->gt_version =1 ;
@@ -3047,18 +3103,6 @@ grant_table_create(spin_lock_init (&t->active[i][j].lock); } -/* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ - if ( (t->maptrack = xzalloc_array(struct grant_mapping *, - max_maptrack_frames)) ==NULL ) - goto no_mem_2; -if ( (t->maptrack[0 ] =alloc_xenheap_page ()) ==NULL ) - goto no_mem_3; -clear_page (t->maptrack[0 ]); - t->maptrack_limit =MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ; -for ( i =1 ; i <MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ; i++ ) - t->maptrack[0 ][i -1 ].ref = i; - t->maptrack[0 ][i -1 ].ref =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; -/* Shared grant table. */ if ( (t->shared_raw = xzalloc_array(void *, max_grant_frames)) == NULL ) goto no_mem_3;
@@ -3089,8 +3133,6 @@ grant_table_create(free_xenheap_page (t->shared_raw[i]);xfree (t->shared_raw); no_mem_3: -free_xenheap_page (t->maptrack[0 ]); -xfree (t->maptrack); no_mem_2:for ( i =0 ; i <num_act_frames_from_sha_frames (INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES ); i++ )
@@ -3225,7 +3267,7 @@ grant_table_destroy(for ( i =0 ; i <nr_maptrack_frames (t); i++ )free_xenheap_page (t->maptrack[i]); -xfree (t->maptrack); +vfree (t->maptrack);for ( i =0 ; i <nr_active_grant_frames (t); i++ )free_xenheap_page (t->active[i]);
xen/include/xen/grant_table.h +1 -2
@@ -73,9 +73,8 @@ struct grant_table {grant_status_t **status;/* Active grant table. */ struct active_grant_entry **active; -/* Mapping tracking table. */ +/* Mapping tracking table per vcpu. */ struct grant_mapping **maptrack; -unsigned int maptrack_head;unsigned int maptrack_limit;/* Lock protecting the maptrack page list, head, and limit */ spinlock_t maptrack_lock;
xen/include/xen/sched.h +4 -0
@@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ struct vcpu/* VCPU paused by system controller. */ int controller_pause_count; +/* Maptrack */ +unsigned int maptrack_head; +unsigned int maptrack_tail; +/* IRQ-safe virq_lock protects against delivering VIRQ to stale evtchn. */ evtchn_port_t virq_to_evtchn[NR_VIRQS ];spinlock_t virq_lock;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [PATCHv14 1/2] gnttab: use per-VCPU maptrack free lists
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 17.06.15 at 15:53, <[email protected]> wrote:
xen/common/grant_table.c +0
-0@@ -1474,6 +1519,17 @@ gnttab_setup_table( gt = d->grant_table;write_lock (>->lock);
xen/common/grant_table.c gnttab_setup_table( · line 1531
Quoted 10 lines
xen/common/grant_table.c +10
-0+/* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ + gt->maptrack =vzalloc (max_maptrack_frames *sizeof (*gt->maptrack)); +if ( gt->maptrack ==NULL ) + goto out3; +for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) + { + v->maptrack_head =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + v->maptrack_tail =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + } + gt->maptrack_limit =0 ;
I'm sorry for noticing this only now, but this change adds a dependency on a domain invoking GNTTABOP_map_grant_ref to have invoked GNTTABOP_setup_table first. Not only did such a requirement not exist before afaict, you also don't verify that to be the case, and hence it looks like __get_maptrack_handle() could end up de-referencing NULL in such a case. IOW these sentinels need to be set during vCPU initialization instead, and gt->maptrack allocation needs to remain in grant_table_create().
Jan
Re: [PATCHv14 1/2] gnttab: use per-VCPU maptrack free lists
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines · On 18.06.15 at 12:02, <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 1 line · On 17.06.15 at 15:53, <[email protected]> wrote:
xen/common/grant_table.c +0
-0@@ -1474,6 +1519,17 @@ gnttab_setup_table( gt = d->grant_table;write_lock (>->lock);xen/common/grant_table.c gnttab_setup_table( · line 1531
Quoted 10 lines
xen/common/grant_table.c +10
-0+/* Tracking of mapped foreign frames table */ + gt->maptrack =vzalloc (max_maptrack_frames *sizeof (*gt->maptrack)); +if ( gt->maptrack ==NULL ) + goto out3; +for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) + { + v->maptrack_head =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + v->maptrack_tail =MAPTRACK_TAIL ; + } + gt->maptrack_limit =0 ;
Quoted 8 lines
I'm sorry for noticing this only now, but this change adds a dependency on a domain invoking
GNTTABOP_map_grant_refto have invokedGNTTABOP_setup_tablefirst. Not only did such a requirement not exist before afaict, you also don't verify that to be the case, and hence it looks like__get_maptrack_handle()could end up de-referencing NULL in such a case. IOW these sentinels need to be set during vCPU initialization instead, andgt->maptrackallocation needs to remain ingrant_table_create().
And, not having said so explicitly, the setting of gt->maptrack_limit needs to go away here too (and doesn't need to be done explicitly in grant_table_create() due to the xzalloc() there).
All of this then also addresses the possibility of multiple invocations of GNTTABOP_setup_table by a guest.
Jan
PATCH v14 2/2 gnttab: steal maptrack entries from other VCPUs
In reply to David VrabelIf a guest is not evenly grant mapping across its VCPUs one of the VCPUs may run out of free maptrack entries even though other VCPUs have many free.
If this happens, "steal" free entries from other VCPUs. We want to steal entries such that:
a) We avoid ping-ponging stolen entries between VCPUs.
b) The number of free entries owned by each VCPUs tends (over time) to the number it uses.
So when stealing, we select a VCPU at random (reducing (a)) and we transfer the stolen entries to the thief VCPU (aiming for (b)).
---
v14:
- Use get_random().
- v -> curr, d -> currd and const (where appropriate).
- Check for NULL currd->vcpu[i].
v13:
- Steal an extra entry for the sentinel if a VCPU's free list is unitialized.
v12:
- New.
--- xen/common/grant_table.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
xen/common/grant_table.c +80 -15
@@ -295,26 +295,70 @@ __get_maptrack_handle(struct grant_table *t, struct vcpu *v) { - unsigned int head, next; + unsigned int head, next, prev_head; -/* No maptrack pages allocated for this VCPU yet? */ - head = v->maptrack_head; -if (unlikely (head ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) -return -1 ; +do { +/* No maptrack pages allocated for this VCPU yet? */ + head =read_atomic (&v->maptrack_head); +if (unlikely (head ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) +return -1 ; -/* -* Always keep one entry in the free list to make it easier to add -* free entries to the tail. -*/ - next =read_atomic (&maptrack_entry (t, head).ref); -if (unlikely (next ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) -return -1 ; +/* +* Always keep one entry in the free list to make it easier to +* add free entries to the tail. +*/ + next =read_atomic (&maptrack_entry (t, head).ref); +if (unlikely (next ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) ) +return -1 ; - v->maptrack_head = next; + prev_head = head; + head =cmpxchg (&v->maptrack_head, prev_head, next); + }while ( head != prev_head );return head; } +/* +* Try to "steal" a free maptrack entry from another VCPU. +* +* A stolen entry is transferred to the thief, so the number of +* entries for each VCPU should tend to the usage pattern. +* +* To avoid having to atomically count the number of free entries on +* each VCPU and to avoid two VCPU repeatedly stealing entries from +* each other, the initial victim VCPU is selected randomly. +*/ +static int steal_maptrack_handle (struct grant_table *t, +const struct vcpu *curr) +{ +const struct domain *currd = curr->domain; +unsigned int first, i; + +/* Find an initial victim. */ + first = i =get_random () % currd->max_vcpus; + +do { +if ( currd->vcpu[i] ) + { +unsigned int handle; + + handle =__get_maptrack_handle (t, currd->vcpu[i]); +if ( handle >=0 ) + { +maptrack_entry (t, handle).vcpu = curr->vcpu_id; +return handle; + } + } + + i++; +if ( i == currd->max_vcpus ) + i =0 ; + }while ( i != first ); + +/* No free handles on any VCPU. */ +return -1 ; +} +static inline void put_maptrack_handle (struct grant_table *t,int handle)
@@ -354,10 +398,31 @@ get_maptrack_handle(spin_lock (&lgt->maptrack_lock); +/* +* If we've run out of frames, try stealing an entry from another +* VCPU (in case the guest isn't mapping across its VCPUs evenly). +*/ if (nr_maptrack_frames (lgt) >= max_maptrack_frames ) { +/* +* Can drop the lock since no other VCPU can be adding a new +* frame once they've run out. +*/ spin_unlock (&lgt->maptrack_lock); -return -1 ; + +/* +* Uninitialized free list? Steal an extra entry for the tail +* sentinel. +*/ +if ( curr->maptrack_tail ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) + { + handle =steal_maptrack_handle (lgt, curr); +if ( handle ==-1 ) +return -1 ; + curr->maptrack_tail = handle; +write_atomic (&curr->maptrack_head, handle); + } +return steal_maptrack_handle (lgt, curr); } new_mt =alloc_xenheap_page ();
@@ -385,7 +450,7 @@ get_maptrack_handle(if ( curr->maptrack_tail ==MAPTRACK_TAIL ) curr->maptrack_tail = handle +MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE -1 ; - curr->maptrack_head = handle +1 ; +write_atomic (&curr->maptrack_head, handle +1 ); lgt->maptrack[nr_maptrack_frames (lgt)] = new_mt; lgt->maptrack_limit +=MAPTRACK_PER_PAGE ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
Re: [PATCHv14 2/2] gnttab: steal maptrack entries from other VCPUs
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 17.06.15 at 15:53, <[email protected]> wrote:
xen/common/grant_table.c +6
-0+static int steal_maptrack_handle (struct grant_table *t, +const struct vcpu *curr) +{ +const struct domain *currd = curr->domain; +unsigned int first, i; +
xen/common/grant_table.c __get_maptrack_handle( · line 346
Quoted 10 lines
xen/common/grant_table.c +10
-0+/* Find an initial victim. */ + first = i =get_random () % currd->max_vcpus; + + do { + if ( currd->vcpu[i] ) + { + unsigned int handle; + + handle = __get_maptrack_handle(t, currd->vcpu[i]); + if ( handle >= 0 )
This comparison is always true. With handle's type fixed