Patch "can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
can-fix-loss-of-can-frames-in-raw_rcv.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
36c01245eb8046c16eee6431e7dbfbb302635fa8Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hartkopp <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:50:44 +0200
Subject: can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv
From: Oliver Hartkopp <[email protected]>
commit 36c01245eb8046c16eee6431e7dbfbb302635fa8 upstream.
As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=143482089824232&w=2
commit 514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for identical CAN skbs.
As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to CAN frame loss.
As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set. Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the CAN frame loss so far.
--- drivers/net/can/dev.c | 5 +++++ drivers/net/can/slcan.c | 1 + drivers/net/can/vcan.c | 3 +++ net/can/af_can.c | 6 +++++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/can/dev.c +5 -0
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ unsigned int can_get_echo_skb(struct netstruct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc; +if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64)) +__net_timestamp (skb); +netif_rx (priv->echo_skb[idx]); priv->echo_skb[idx] =NULL ;
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_can_skb(struct netif (unlikely (!skb))return NULL ; +__net_timestamp (skb); skb->protocol =htons (ETH_P_CAN ); skb->pkt_type =PACKET_BROADCAST ; skb->ip_summed =CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY ;
@@ -603,6 +607,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_canfd_skb(struct nif (unlikely (!skb))return NULL ; +__net_timestamp (skb); skb->protocol =htons (ETH_P_CANFD ); skb->pkt_type =PACKET_BROADCAST ; skb->ip_summed =CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY ;
drivers/net/can/slcan.c +1 -0
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void slc_bump(struct slcan *sl)if (!skb)return ; +__net_timestamp (skb); skb->dev = sl->dev; skb->protocol =htons (ETH_P_CAN ); skb->pkt_type =PACKET_BROADCAST ;
drivers/net/can/vcan.c +3 -0
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static void vcan_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, skb->dev = dev; skb->ip_summed =CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY ; +if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64)) +__net_timestamp (skb); +netif_rx_ni (skb); }
net/can/af_can.c +5 -1
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ int can_send(struct sk_buff *skb, int loreturn err; } -if (newskb) +if (newskb) { +if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64)) +__net_timestamp (newskb); +netif_rx_ni (newskb); + }/* update statistics */ can_stats.tx_frames++;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.1/can-fix-loss-of-can-frames-in-raw_rcv.patch