fix the prime lock deadlock
Subsystems (2)
Dave Airlie
maintainerThe first two patches are cleanups, the second two attempt to fix the deadlock on the prime lock, in the failure paths.
Patch 3 is based on a proposal from Daniel Vetter.
I've ran these under virgl and I can't reproduce the deadlock there.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Dave Airlie
maintainerPATCH 1/4 drm/gem: consolidate handle deletion code.
From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
This code was duplicated, make it decidely
less duplicated.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +17 -18
@@ -239,6 +239,21 @@ drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj); } +static void +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (struct drm_file *filp, +struct drm_gem_object *obj) +{ +struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; + +if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) +drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp); +drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, filp->filp); + +if (dev->driver->gem_close_object) + dev->driver->gem_close_object (obj, filp); +drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); +} +/** * drm_gem_handle_delete - deletes the given file-private handle * @filp: drm file-private structure to use for the handle look up
@@ -276,14 +291,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete(struct drm_file *filp, u32 handle)idr_remove (&filp->object_idr, handle);spin_unlock (&filp->table_lock); -if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) -drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp); -drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, filp->filp); - -if (dev->driver->gem_close_object) - dev->driver->gem_close_object (obj, filp); -drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); - +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (filp, obj);return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (drm_gem_handle_delete);
@@ -708,17 +716,8 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data) {struct drm_file *file_priv = data;struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr; -struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; - -if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) -drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, file_priv); -drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); - -if (dev->driver->gem_close_object) - dev->driver->gem_close_object (obj, file_priv); - -drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (file_priv, obj);return 0 ; }
Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Dave Airlie
maintainerPATCH 2/4 drm/prime: cleanup goto mess in drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd
In reply to Dave AirlieFrom: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
I think I might have been responsible for some of this, but it's messy to decode, this doesn't change anything, but cleans up the goto's and exit paths.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +32 -41
@@ -420,47 +420,42 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev, dmabuf =drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle (&file_priv->prime, handle);if (dmabuf) {get_dma_buf (dmabuf); - goto out_have_handle; - } - -mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); -/* re-export the original imported object */ -if (obj->import_attach) { - dmabuf = obj->import_attach->dmabuf; -get_dma_buf (dmabuf); - goto out_have_obj; - } - -if (obj->dma_buf) { -get_dma_buf (obj->dma_buf); - dmabuf = obj->dma_buf; - goto out_have_obj; - } + }else { +mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); +/* re-export the original imported object */ +if (obj->import_attach) { + dmabuf = obj->import_attach->dmabuf; +get_dma_buf (dmabuf); + }else if (obj->dma_buf) { +get_dma_buf (obj->dma_buf); + dmabuf = obj->dma_buf; + }else { + dmabuf =export_and_register_object (dev, obj, flags); +if (IS_ERR (dmabuf)) { +/* normally the created dma-buf takes ownership of the ref, +* but if that fails then drop the ref +*/ + ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf); +mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); + goto out; + } + } - dmabuf =export_and_register_object (dev, obj, flags); -if (IS_ERR (dmabuf)) { -/* normally the created dma-buf takes ownership of the ref, -* but if that fails then drop the ref +/* +* If we've exported this buffer then cheat and add it to the import list +* so we get the correct handle back. We must do this under the +* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close +* ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. */ - ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf); + ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + dmabuf, handle);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); - goto out; +if (ret) { +dma_buf_put (dmabuf); + goto out; + } } -out_have_obj: -/* -* If we've exported this buffer then cheat and add it to the import list -* so we get the correct handle back. We must do this under the -* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close -* ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. -*/ - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dmabuf, handle); -mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); -if (ret) - goto fail_put_dmabuf; - -out_have_handle: ret =dma_buf_fd (dmabuf, flags);/* * We must _not_ remove the buffer from the handle cache since the newly
@@ -469,16 +464,12 @@ out_have_handle:* Closing the handle will clean out the cache anyway, so we don't leak. */ if (ret <0 ) { - goto fail_put_dmabuf; +dma_buf_put (dmabuf); }else { *prime_fd = ret; ret =0 ; } - goto out; - -fail_put_dmabuf: -dma_buf_put (dmabuf); out:drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj); out_unlock:
Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/prime: cleanup goto mess in drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd
Quoted 7 lines · Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
I think I might have been responsible for some of this, but it's messy to decode, this doesn't change anything, but cleans up the goto's and exit paths.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
Before coffee, but looks good. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Quoted 112 lines
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +32
-41@@ -420,47 +420,42 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev, dmabuf =drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle (&file_priv->prime, handle);if (dmabuf) {get_dma_buf (dmabuf); - goto out_have_handle; - } - -mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); -/* re-export the original imported object */ -if (obj->import_attach) { - dmabuf = obj->import_attach->dmabuf; -get_dma_buf (dmabuf); - goto out_have_obj; - } - -if (obj->dma_buf) { -get_dma_buf (obj->dma_buf); - dmabuf = obj->dma_buf; - goto out_have_obj; - } + }else { +mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); +/* re-export the original imported object */ +if (obj->import_attach) { + dmabuf = obj->import_attach->dmabuf; +get_dma_buf (dmabuf); + }else if (obj->dma_buf) { +get_dma_buf (obj->dma_buf); + dmabuf = obj->dma_buf; + }else { + dmabuf =export_and_register_object (dev, obj, flags); +if (IS_ERR (dmabuf)) { +/* normally the created dma-buf takes ownership of the ref, +* but if that fails then drop the ref +*/ + ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf); +mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); + goto out; + } + } - dmabuf =export_and_register_object (dev, obj, flags); -if (IS_ERR (dmabuf)) { -/* normally the created dma-buf takes ownership of the ref, -* but if that fails then drop the ref +/* +* If we've exported this buffer then cheat and add it to the import list +* so we get the correct handle back. We must do this under the +* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close +* ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. */ - ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf); + ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + dmabuf, handle);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); - goto out; +if (ret) { +dma_buf_put (dmabuf); + goto out; + } } -out_have_obj: -/* -* If we've exported this buffer then cheat and add it to the import list -* so we get the correct handle back. We must do this under the -* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close -* ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. -*/ - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dmabuf, handle); -mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); -if (ret) - goto fail_put_dmabuf; - -out_have_handle: ret =dma_buf_fd (dmabuf, flags);/* * We must _not_ remove the buffer from the handle cache since the newly @@ -469,16 +464,12 @@ out_have_handle:* Closing the handle will clean out the cache anyway, so we don't leak. */ if (ret <0 ) { - goto fail_put_dmabuf; +dma_buf_put (dmabuf); }else { *prime_fd = ret; ret =0 ; } - goto out; - -fail_put_dmabuf: -dma_buf_put (dmabuf); out:drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj); out_unlock:Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Signature · 7 lines
Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Dave Airlie
maintainerPATCH 3/4 drm/gem: cleanup prime lock issue with drm_gem_handle_create_tail
In reply to Dave AirlieFrom: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
This patch cleans up one locking order issue with a deadlock on the prime lock.
It avoids calling the prime delete function from drm_gem_handle_create_tail, and instead open codes the exit paths, it also splits the common code out for the exit path which can use it.
This means the callee has to call the prime cleanup paths, which is fine since this is only the prime code and it holds the lock already.
This is based on an patch/idea by Daniel Vetter, but I've cleaned it up and reworked it.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +33 -22
@@ -239,14 +239,12 @@ drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj); } +/* use for deletion and failure in allocation */ static void -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (struct drm_file *filp, -struct drm_gem_object *obj) +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (struct drm_file *filp, +struct drm_gem_object *obj) {struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; - -if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) -drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp);drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, filp->filp);if (dev->driver->gem_close_object)
@@ -254,6 +252,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(struct drm_file *filp,drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); } +static void +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (struct drm_file *filp, +struct drm_gem_object *obj) +{ +struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; + +if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) +drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp); +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (filp, obj); +} +/** * drm_gem_handle_delete - deletes the given file-private handle * @filp: drm file-private structure to use for the handle look up
@@ -291,7 +300,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete(struct drm_file *filp, u32 handle)idr_remove (&filp->object_idr, handle);spin_unlock (&filp->table_lock); -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (filp, obj); +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (filp, obj);return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (drm_gem_handle_delete);
@@ -333,6 +342,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,WARN_ON (!mutex_is_locked (&dev->object_name_lock)); + ret =drm_vma_node_allow (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); +if (ret) { + goto out_unlock; + } + +if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) { + ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object (obj, file_priv); +if (ret) + goto out_vma; + } +/* * Get the user-visible handle using idr. Preload and perform * allocation under our spinlock.
@@ -347,26 +367,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,idr_preload_end ();mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock);if (ret <0 ) { -drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (file_priv, obj);return ret; } *handlep = ret; - ret =drm_vma_node_allow (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); -if (ret) { -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handlep); -return ret; - } - -if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) { - ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object (obj, file_priv); -if (ret) { -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handlep); -return ret; - } - } -return 0 ; +out_vma: +drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); +out_unlock: +mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +return ret; }/**
@@ -717,7 +728,7 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data)struct drm_file *file_priv = data;struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr; -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (file_priv, obj); +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (file_priv, obj);return 0 ; }
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +3 -0
@@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,/* drm_gem_handle_create_tail unlocks dev->object_name_lock. */ ret =drm_gem_handle_create_tail (file_priv, obj, handle); +if (ret) +drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked (&file_priv->prime, + obj->dma_buf);drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj);if (ret) goto out_put;
Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/gem: cleanup prime lock issue with drm_gem_handle_create_tail
Quoted 135 lines · Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
This patch cleans up one locking order issue with a deadlock on the prime lock.
It avoids calling the prime delete function from
drm_gem_handle_create_tail, and instead open codes the exit paths, it also splits the common code out for the exit path which can use it.This means the callee has to call the prime cleanup paths, which is fine since this is only the prime code and it holds the lock already.
This is based on an patch/idea by Daniel Vetter, but I've cleaned it up and reworked it.
Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +33
-22@@ -239,14 +239,12 @@ drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj); } +/* use for deletion and failure in allocation */ static void -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (struct drm_file *filp, -struct drm_gem_object *obj) +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (struct drm_file *filp, +struct drm_gem_object *obj) {struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; - -if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) -drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp);drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, filp->filp);if (dev->driver->gem_close_object)@@ -254,6 +252,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete_tail(struct drm_file *filp,drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); } +static void +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (struct drm_file *filp, +struct drm_gem_object *obj) +{ +struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; + +if (drm_core_check_feature (dev,DRIVER_PRIME )) +drm_gem_remove_prime_handles (obj, filp); +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (filp, obj); +} +/** * drm_gem_handle_delete - deletes the given file-private handle * @filp: drm file-private structure to use for the handle look up @@ -291,7 +300,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_delete(struct drm_file *filp, u32 handle)idr_remove (&filp->object_idr, handle);spin_unlock (&filp->table_lock); -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (filp, obj); +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (filp, obj);return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (drm_gem_handle_delete);@@ -333,6 +342,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,WARN_ON (!mutex_is_locked (&dev->object_name_lock)); + ret =drm_vma_node_allow (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); +if (ret) { + goto out_unlock; + } + +if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) { + ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object (obj, file_priv); +if (ret) + goto out_vma; + } +/* * Get the user-visible handle using idr. Preload and perform * allocation under our spinlock. @@ -347,26 +367,17 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,idr_preload_end ();mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock);if (ret <0 ) { -drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked (obj); +drm_gem_handle_cleanup (file_priv, obj);return ret; } *handlep = ret; - ret =drm_vma_node_allow (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); -if (ret) { -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handlep); -return ret; - } - -if (dev->driver->gem_open_object) { - ret = dev->driver->gem_open_object (obj, file_priv); -if (ret) { -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handlep); -return ret; - } - } -return 0 ; +out_vma: +drm_vma_node_revoke (&obj->vma_node, file_priv->filp); +out_unlock: +mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +return ret; }/** @@ -717,7 +728,7 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data)struct drm_file *file_priv = data;struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr; -drm_gem_handle_delete_tail (file_priv, obj); +drm_gem_handle_delete_tail_prime (file_priv, obj);return 0 ; }drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, · line 595
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +3
-0@@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,/* drm_gem_handle_create_tail unlocks dev->object_name_lock. */ ret =drm_gem_handle_create_tail (file_priv, obj, handle); +if (ret) +drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked (&file_priv->prime, + obj->dma_buf);
Why is this needed? We haven't yet added the handle the buffer lookup table at this point. the create_handle_tail changes look good, so with this hunk here removed the patch is
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +0
-0drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj);if (ret) goto out_put;Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Signature · 7 lines
Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Dave Airlie
maintainerPATCH 4/4 drm/prime: cleanup prime/gem locking interaction
In reply to Dave AirlieFrom: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
calling drm_gem_handle_delete would cause an attempt to retake the prime lock.
move code around so we never need to do that. This patch allocates the member structure early, so there is no failure path that requires calling drm_gem_handle_delete.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +24 -25
@@ -71,20 +71,14 @@ struct drm_prime_attachment {enum dma_data_direction dir; }; -static int drm_prime_add_buf_handle (struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv, -struct dma_buf *dma_buf,uint32_t handle) +static void drm_prime_add_buf_handle (struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv, +struct drm_prime_member *member, +struct dma_buf *dma_buf,uint32_t handle) { -struct drm_prime_member *member; - - member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!member) -return -ENOMEM ; -get_dma_buf (dma_buf); member->dma_buf = dma_buf; member->handle = handle;list_add (&member->entry, &prime_fpriv->head); -return 0 ; } static struct dma_buf *drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
@@ -409,6 +403,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,struct drm_gem_object *obj;int ret =0 ;struct dma_buf *dmabuf; +struct drm_prime_member *member;mutex_lock (&file_priv->prime.lock); obj =drm_gem_object_lookup (dev, file_priv, handle);
@@ -417,6 +412,12 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev, goto out_unlock; } + member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!member) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out_unlock; + } + dmabuf =drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle (&file_priv->prime, handle);if (dmabuf) {get_dma_buf (dmabuf);
@@ -437,6 +438,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,*/ ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +kfree (member); goto out; } }
@@ -447,13 +449,9 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close * ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. */ - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dmabuf, handle); +drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + member, dmabuf, handle);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); -if (ret) { -dma_buf_put (dmabuf); - goto out; - } } ret =dma_buf_fd (dmabuf, flags);
@@ -560,6 +558,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, {struct dma_buf *dma_buf;struct drm_gem_object *obj; +struct drm_prime_member *member;int ret; dma_buf =dma_buf_get (prime_fd);
@@ -573,6 +572,11 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,if (ret ==0 ) goto out_put; + member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!member) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out_put; + }/* never seen this one, need to import */ mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); obj = dev->driver->gem_prime_import (dev, dma_buf);
@@ -595,12 +599,10 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, obj->dma_buf);drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj);if (ret) - goto out_put; + goto out_member; - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dma_buf, *handle); -if (ret) - goto fail; +drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + member, dma_buf, *handle);mutex_unlock (&file_priv->prime.lock);
@@ -608,13 +610,10 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,return 0 ; -fail: -/* hmm, if driver attached, we are relying on the free-object path -* to detach.. which seems ok.. -*/ -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handle); out_unlock:mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +out_member: +kfree (member); out_put:dma_buf_put (dma_buf);mutex_unlock (&file_priv->prime.lock);
Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/prime: cleanup prime/gem locking interaction
Quoted 110 lines · Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
calling
drm_gem_handle_deletewould cause an attempt to retake the prime lock.move code around so we never need to do that. This patch allocates the member structure early, so there is no failure path that requires calling
drm_gem_handle_delete.Signed-off-by Dave Airlie <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +19
-15@@ -71,20 +71,14 @@ struct drm_prime_attachment {enum dma_data_direction dir; }; -static int drm_prime_add_buf_handle (struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv, -struct dma_buf *dma_buf,uint32_t handle) +static void drm_prime_add_buf_handle (struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv, +struct drm_prime_member *member, +struct dma_buf *dma_buf,uint32_t handle) { -struct drm_prime_member *member; - - member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!member) -return -ENOMEM ; -get_dma_buf (dma_buf); member->dma_buf = dma_buf; member->handle = handle;list_add (&member->entry, &prime_fpriv->head); -return 0 ; } static struct dma_buf *drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,@@ -409,6 +403,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,struct drm_gem_object *obj;int ret =0 ;struct dma_buf *dmabuf; +struct drm_prime_member *member;mutex_lock (&file_priv->prime.lock); obj =drm_gem_object_lookup (dev, file_priv, handle);@@ -417,6 +412,12 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev, goto out_unlock; } + member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!member) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out_unlock; + } + dmabuf =drm_prime_lookup_buf_by_handle (&file_priv->prime, handle);if (dmabuf) {get_dma_buf (dmabuf);@@ -437,6 +438,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,*/ ret =PTR_ERR (dmabuf);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +kfree (member); goto out; } }@@ -447,13 +449,9 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev,* protection of dev->object_name_lock to ensure that a racing gem close * ioctl doesn't miss to remove this buffer handle from the cache. */ - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dmabuf, handle); +drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + member, dmabuf, handle);mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); -if (ret) { -dma_buf_put (dmabuf); - goto out; - } } ret =dma_buf_fd (dmabuf, flags);@@ -560,6 +558,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, {struct dma_buf *dma_buf;struct drm_gem_object *obj; +struct drm_prime_member *member;int ret; dma_buf =dma_buf_get (prime_fd);@@ -573,6 +572,11 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,if (ret ==0 ) goto out_put; + member =kmalloc (sizeof (*member),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!member) { + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto out_put; + }/* never seen this one, need to import */ mutex_lock (&dev->object_name_lock); obj = dev->driver->gem_prime_import (dev, dma_buf);@@ -595,12 +599,10 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, obj->dma_buf);drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked (obj);
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, · line 605
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +3
-5if (ret) - goto out_put; + goto out_member; - ret =drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, - dma_buf, *handle); -if (ret) - goto fail; +drm_prime_add_buf_handle (&file_priv->prime, + member, dma_buf, *handle);
member = NULL;
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +0
-0mutex_unlock (&file_priv->prime.lock);@@ -608,13 +610,10 @@ int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev,return 0 ;
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c int drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle(struct drm_device *dev, · line 617
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +2
-5-fail: -/* hmm, if driver attached, we are relying on the free-object path -* to detach.. which seems ok.. -*/ -drm_gem_handle_delete (file_priv, *handle); out_unlock:mutex_unlock (&dev->object_name_lock); +out_member: +kfree (member); out_put:
and put the kfree (since it can deal with NULL) below the out_put here as a random bikeshed. Anyway, looks good as is.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c +0
-0dma_buf_put (dma_buf);mutex_unlock (&file_priv->prime.lock);Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Signature · 7 lines
Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel