Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix memory leak

PATCH In review Alexander Aring 2 participants 3 messages Oct 22, 2015

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Alexander Aring

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix memory leak

Looking at current situation of memory management in 6lowpan receive function I detected some invalid handling. After calling lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers we will do a kfree_skb and then NET_RX_DROP on error handling. We don't do this before, also on skb_share_check/skb_unshare which might manipulate the reference counters.

After running some 'grep -r "dev_add_pack" net/' to look how others packet-layer receive callbacks works I detected that every subsystem do a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP without calling skb functions which might manipulate the skb reference counters. This is the reason why we should do the same here like all others subsystems. I didn't find any documentation how the packet-layer receive callbacks handle NET_RX_DROP return values either.

This patch will add a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP handling for the "trivial checks", in case of skb_share_check/skb_unshare the kfree_skb call will be done inside these functions.

---
References how other filesystem handle the callback:

[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/ipx/af_ipx.c#L1638
[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/can/af_can.c#L709
[2] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/phonet/af_phonet.c#L371

 net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c +9 -4
index 403f171..ef185dd 100644
@@ -284,16 +284,16 @@ static int lowpan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *wdev,
 	if (wdev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154 ||
 	    skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST ||
 	    !lowpan_rx_h_check(skb))
-		return NET_RX_DROP;
+		goto drop;
 
 	ldev = wdev->ieee802154_ptr->lowpan_dev;
 	if (!ldev || !netif_running(ldev))
-		return NET_RX_DROP;
+		goto drop;
 
 	/* Replacing skb->dev and followed rx handlers will manipulate skb. */
 	skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!skb)
-		return NET_RX_DROP;
+		goto out;
 	skb->dev = ldev;
 
 	/* When receive frag1 it's likely that we manipulate the buffer.
@@ -304,10 +304,15 @@ static int lowpan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *wdev,
 	    lowpan_is_iphc(*skb_network_header(skb))) {
 		skb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (!skb)
-			return NET_RX_DROP;
+			goto out;
 	}
 
 	return lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers(skb);
+
+drop:
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+out:
+	return NET_RX_DROP;
 }
 
 static struct packet_type lowpan_packet_type = {
Signature · 1 line
2.6.1
author maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Alexander Aring

Looking at current situation of memory management in 6lowpan receive function I detected some invalid handling. After calling lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers we will do a kfree_skb and then NET_RX_DROP on error handling. We don't do this before, also on skb_share_check/skb_unshare which might manipulate the reference counters.

After running some 'grep -r "dev_add_pack" net/' to look how others packet-layer receive callbacks works I detected that every subsystem do a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP without calling skb functions which might manipulate the skb reference counters. This is the reason why we should do the same here like all others subsystems. I didn't find any documentation how the packet-layer receive callbacks handle NET_RX_DROP return values either.

Quoted 7 lines

This patch will add a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP handling for the "trivial checks", in case of skb_share_check/skb_unshare the kfree_skb call will be done inside these functions.

---
References how other filesystem handle the callback:

s/filesystem/subsystems/

- Alex

#2 lore raw
In reply to Alexander Aring

Hi Alex,

Quoted 23 lines

Looking at current situation of memory management in 6lowpan receive function I detected some invalid handling. After calling lowpan_invoke_rx_handlers we will do a kfree_skb and then NET_RX_DROP on error handling. We don't do this before, also on skb_share_check/skb_unshare which might manipulate the reference counters.

After running some 'grep -r "dev_add_pack" net/' to look how others packet-layer receive callbacks works I detected that every subsystem do a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP without calling skb functions which might manipulate the skb reference counters. This is the reason why we should do the same here like all others subsystems. I didn't find any documentation how the packet-layer receive callbacks handle NET_RX_DROP return values either.

This patch will add a kfree_skb, then NET_RX_DROP handling for the "trivial checks", in case of skb_share_check/skb_unshare the kfree_skb call will be done inside these functions.

---
References how other filesystem handle the callback:

Quoted 6 lines

[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/ipx/af_ipx.c#L1638
[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/can/af_can.c#L709
[2] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/phonet/af_phonet.c#L371

net/ieee802154/6lowpan/rx.c | 13 +++++++++----

1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel