Patch "fs/proc, core/debug: Don't expose absolute kernel addresses via wchan" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fs/proc, core/debug: Don't expose absolute kernel addresses via wchan
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fs-proc-core-debug-don-t-expose-absolute-kernel-addresses-via-wchan.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
b2f73922d119686323f14fbbe46587f863852328Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:59:17 +0200
Subject: fs/proc, core/debug: Don't expose absolute kernel addresses via wchan
From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
commit b2f73922d119686323f14fbbe46587f863852328 upstream.
So the /proc/PID/stat 'wchan' field (the 30th field, which contains the absolute kernel address of the kernel function a task is blocked in) leaks absolute kernel addresses to unprivileged user-space:
seq_put_decimal_ull(m, ' ', wchan);
The absolute address might also leak via /proc/PID/wchan as well, if KALLSYMS is turned off or if the symbol lookup fails for some reason:
static int proc_pid_wchan(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
{
unsigned long wchan;
char symname[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
wchan = get_wchan(task);
if (lookup_symbol_name(wchan, symname) < 0) {
if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
return 0;
seq_printf(m, "%lu", wchan);
} else {
seq_printf(m, "%s", symname);
}
return 0;
}This isn't ideal, because for example it trivially leaks the KASLR offset to any local attacker:
fomalhaut:~> printf "%016lx\n" $(cat /proc/$$/stat | cut -d' ' -f35) ffffffff8123b380
Most real-life uses of wchan are symbolic:
ps -eo pid:10,tid:10,wchan:30,comm
and procps uses /proc/PID/wchan, not the absolute address in /proc/PID/stat:
triton:~/tip> strace -f ps -eo pid:10,tid:10,wchan:30,comm 2>&1 | grep wchan | tail -1
open("/proc/30833/wchan", O_RDONLY) = 6
There's one compatibility quirk here: procps relies on whether the absolute value is non-zero - and we can provide that functionality by outputing "0" or "1" depending on whether the task is blocked (whether there's a wchan address).
These days there appears to be very little legitimate reason user-space would be interested in the absolute address. The absolute address is mostly historic: from the days when we didn't have kallsyms and user-space procps had to do the decoding itself via the System.map.
So this patch sets all numeric output to "0" or "1" and keeps only symbolic output, in /proc/PID/wchan.
( The absolute sleep address can generally still be profiled via
perf, by tasks with sufficient privileges. )
--- Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 5 +++-- fs/proc/array.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- fs/proc/base.c | 9 +++------ 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt +3 -2
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ Table 1-1: Process specific entries in / stat Process status statm Process memory status information status Process status in human readable form - wchan If CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set, a pre-decoded wchan + wchan Present with CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y: it shows the kernel function + symbol the task is blocked in - or "0" if not blocked. pagemap Page table stack Report full stack trace, enable via CONFIG_STACKTRACE smaps a extension based on maps, showing the memory consumption of
@@ -309,7 +310,7 @@ Table 1-4: Contents of the stat files (a blocked bitmap of blocked signals sigign bitmap of ignored signals sigcatch bitmap of caught signals - wchan address where process went to sleep + 0 (place holder, used to be the wchan address, use /proc/PID/wchan instead) 0 (place holder) 0 (place holder) exit_signal signal to send to parent thread on exit
fs/proc/array.c +14 -2
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m,static int do_task_stat (struct seq_file *m,struct pid_namespace *ns,struct pid *pid,struct task_struct *task,int whole) { -unsigned long vsize, eip, esp, wchan = ~0UL ; +unsigned long vsize, eip, esp, wchan =0 ;int priority, nice;int tty_pgrp =-1 , tty_nr =0 ;sigset_t sigign, sigcatch;
@@ -496,7 +496,19 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_fileseq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' , task->blocked.sig[0 ] &0x7fffffffUL );seq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' , sigign.sig[0 ] &0x7fffffffUL );seq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' , sigcatch.sig[0 ] &0x7fffffffUL ); -seq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' , wchan); + +/* +* We used to output the absolute kernel address, but that's an +* information leak - so instead we show a 0/1 flag here, to signal +* to user-space whether there's a wchan field in /proc/PID/wchan. +* +* This works with older implementations of procps as well. +*/ +if (wchan) +seq_puts (m," 1" ); +else +seq_puts (m," 0" ); +seq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' ,0 );seq_put_decimal_ull (m,' ' ,0 );seq_put_decimal_ll (m,' ' , task->exit_signal);
fs/proc/base.c +3 -6
@@ -238,13 +238,10 @@ static int proc_pid_wchan(struct seq_fil wchan =get_wchan (task); -if (lookup_symbol_name (wchan, symname) <0 ) { -if (!ptrace_may_access (task,PTRACE_MODE_READ )) -return 0 ; -seq_printf (m,"%lu" , wchan); - }else { +if (wchan &&ptrace_may_access (task,PTRACE_MODE_READ ) && !lookup_symbol_name (wchan, symname))seq_printf (m,"%s" , symname); - } +else +seq_putc (m,'0' );return 0 ; }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.1/x86-setup-extend-low-identity-map-to-cover-whole-kernel-range.patch queue-4.1/fs-proc-core-debug-don-t-expose-absolute-kernel-addresses-via-wchan.patch