alsabat: truncate sample frames for faster FFT analysis
PATCH 1/1 alsabat: truncate sample frames for faster FFT analysis
From: "Lu, Han" <[email protected]>
Truncate the sample frames to powers of 2, since the FFTW algorithm runs especially fast in this case, and other sizes may be computed by means of a slow, general-purpose algorithm.
In my test environment applying the patch, a sound clip of 33072 frames is cut off to 32768 frames before analysis, and the time cost is reduced from 6.128s to 0.224s.
bat/analyze.c +21 -0
@@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ static int reorder_data(struct bat *bat)return 0 ; } +/* truncate sample frames for faster FFT analysis process */ +static int truncate_frames (struct bat *bat) +{ +int shift =SHIFT_MAX ; + +for (; shift >SHIFT_MIN ; shift--) +if (bat->frames & (1 << shift)) { + bat->frames =1 << shift; +return 0 ; + } + +return -EINVAL ; +} +int analyze_capture (struct bat *bat) {int err =0 ;
@@ -263,6 +277,13 @@ int analyze_capture(struct bat *bat)int c;struct analyze a; + err =truncate_frames (bat); +if (err <0 ) { +fprintf (bat->err,_ ("Invalid frame number for analysis: %d\n" ), + bat->frames); +return err; + } +fprintf (bat->log,_ ("\nBAT analysis: signal has %d frames at %d Hz," ), bat->frames, bat->rate); fprintf(bat->log, _(" %d channels, %d bytes per sample.\n"),
bat/common.h +6 -0
@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@#define FOUND_DC (1<<1)#define FOUND_WRONG_PEAK (1<<0) +/* Truncate sample frames to (1 << N), for faster FFT analysis process. The +* valid range of N is (SHIFT_MIN, SHIFT_MAX). When N increases, the analysis +* will be more time-consuming, and the result will be more accurate. */ +#define SHIFT_MAX (sizeof(int) * 8 - 2) +#define SHIFT_MIN 8 +struct wav_header {unsigned int magic;/* 'RIFF' */ unsigned int length;/* file len */
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
Takashi Iwai
AppliedQuoted 11 lines · On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:33:45 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: "Lu, Han" <[email protected]>
Truncate the sample frames to powers of 2, since the FFTW algorithm runs especially fast in this case, and other sizes may be computed by means of a slow, general-purpose algorithm.
In my test environment applying the patch, a sound clip of 33072 frames is cut off to 32768 frames before analysis, and the time cost is reduced from 6.128s to 0.224s.Signed-off-by Lu, Han <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.
Takashi
Quoted 60 lines
bat/analyze.c +21
-0@@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ static int reorder_data(struct bat *bat)return 0 ; } +/* truncate sample frames for faster FFT analysis process */ +static int truncate_frames (struct bat *bat) +{ +int shift =SHIFT_MAX ; + +for (; shift >SHIFT_MIN ; shift--) +if (bat->frames & (1 << shift)) { + bat->frames =1 << shift; +return 0 ; + } + +return -EINVAL ; +} +int analyze_capture (struct bat *bat) {int err =0 ;@@ -263,6 +277,13 @@ int analyze_capture(struct bat *bat)int c;struct analyze a; + err =truncate_frames (bat); +if (err <0 ) { +fprintf (bat->err,_ ("Invalid frame number for analysis: %d\n" ), + bat->frames); +return err; + } +fprintf (bat->log,_ ("\nBAT analysis: signal has %d frames at %d Hz," ), bat->frames, bat->rate); fprintf(bat->log, _(" %d channels, %d bytes per sample.\n"),bat/common.h +6
-0@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@#define FOUND_DC (1<<1)#define FOUND_WRONG_PEAK (1<<0) +/* Truncate sample frames to (1 << N), for faster FFT analysis process. The +* valid range of N is (SHIFT_MIN, SHIFT_MAX). When N increases, the analysis +* will be more time-consuming, and the result will be more accurate. */ +#define SHIFT_MAX (sizeof(int) * 8 - 2) +#define SHIFT_MIN 8 +struct wav_header {unsigned int magic;/* 'RIFF' */ unsigned int length;/* file len */ Signature · 1 line
2.5.0