davinci: device tree - small simplifications
Subsystems (3)
cover davinci: device tree - small simplifications
I have been trying out device tree with mach-davinci. Here are some small simplifications that I have made.
I would also like to know if anyone is working on getting the clocks and related soc devices (pll and psc) into device tree as well.
David Lechner (3):
arm: davinci: simplify call to of populate
arm: davinci: remove unused DA8XX_NUM_UARTS
arm: davinci: use IRQCHIP_DECLARE for cp_intc
arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c | 17 +---------------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 1/3 arm: davinci: simplify call to of populate
Take advantage of of_platoform_default_populate convience function.
--- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c +1 -3
@@ -54,9 +54,7 @@ static struct of_dev_auxdata da850_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {static void __init da850_init_machine (void ) { -of_platform_populate (NULL , of_default_bus_match_table, - da850_auxdata_lookup,NULL ); - +of_platform_default_populate (NULL , da850_auxdata_lookup,NULL ); }static const char *const da850_boards_compat[]__initconst = {
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 2/3 arm: davinci: remove unused DA8XX_NUM_UARTS
In reply to David LechnerDA8X_NUM_UARTS not used in the code anywhere and should be determined by DT anyway.
--- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c +0 -2
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@#include "cp_intc.h" #include <mach/da8xx.h> -#define DA8XX_NUM_UARTS 3 -static const struct of_device_id const da8xx_irq_match[]__initconst = { { .compatible ="ti,cp-intc" , .data = cp_intc_of_init, }, { }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 3/3 arm: davinci: use IRQCHIP_DECLARE for cp_intc
In reply to David LechnerRemove boilerplate code by using IRQCHIP_DECLARE macro.
--- arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c | 3 +++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c | 11 ----------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c +3 -0
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@#include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/irq.h> +#include <linux/irqchip.h> #include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/of.h>
@@ -210,3 +211,5 @@ void __init cp_intc_init(void) {cp_intc_of_init (NULL ,NULL ); } + +IRQCHIP_DECLARE (cp_intc,"ti,cp-intc" , cp_intc_of_init);
arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c +0 -11
@@ -18,16 +18,6 @@#include "cp_intc.h" #include <mach/da8xx.h> -static const struct of_device_id const da8xx_irq_match[]__initconst = { - { .compatible ="ti,cp-intc" , .data = cp_intc_of_init, }, - { } -}; - -static void __init da8xx_init_irq (void ) -{ -of_irq_init (da8xx_irq_match); -} -static struct of_dev_auxdata da850_auxdata_lookup[]__initdata = {OF_DEV_AUXDATA ("ti,davinci-i2c" ,0x01c22000 ,"i2c_davinci.1" ,NULL ),OF_DEV_AUXDATA ("ti,davinci-wdt" ,0x01c21000 ,"davinci-wdt" ,NULL ),
@@ -64,7 +54,6 @@ static const char *const da850_boards_compat[] __initconst = {DT_MACHINE_START (DA850_DT ,"Generic DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x" ) .map_io = da850_init, - .init_irq = da8xx_init_irq, .init_time = davinci_timer_init, .init_machine = da850_init_machine, .dt_compat = da850_boards_compat,
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
cover davinci: device tree - small simplifications
In reply to David LechnerHi David,
Quoted 2 lines · David Lechner
I have been trying out device tree with mach-davinci. Here are some small simplifications that I have made.
Thanks! I will take a look. I have already sent my pull request for v4.6 so these would now be targeted to v4.7
Quoted 2 lines
I would also like to know if anyone is working on getting the clocks and related soc devices (pll and psc) into device tree as well.
Not to my knowledge. As you might have noticed, keystone platform has a (very similar) psc and has a common clock framework driver for that in mainline. The goal should be to reuse that for DaVinci.
Thanks,
Sekhar
cover davinci: device tree - small simplifications
Quoted 8 lines · Sekhar Nori
Hi David,
Quoted 2 lines · David Lechner
I have been trying out device tree with mach-davinci. Here are some small simplifications that I have made.
Thanks! I will take a look. I have already sent my pull request for v4.6 so these would now be targeted to v4.7
All applied for v4.7. I capitalized the "arm: " prefix while applying.
Thanks,
Sekhar