Patch "genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
genirq-prevent-chip-buslock-deadlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
abc7e40c81d113ef4bacb556f0a77ca63ac81d85Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:12:30 +0100
Subject: genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
commit abc7e40c81d113ef4bacb556f0a77ca63ac81d85 upstream.
If a interrupt chip utilizes chip->buslock then free_irq() can deadlock in the following way:
CPU0 CPU1
interrupt(X) (Shared or spurious)free_irq(X) interrupt_thread(X)chip_bus_lock(X)
irq_finalize_oneshot(X)
chip_bus_lock(X)synchronize_irq(X)
synchronize_irq() waits for the interrupt thread to complete, i.e. forever.
Solution is simple: Drop chip_bus_lock() before calling synchronize_irq() as we do with the irq_desc lock. There is nothing to be protected after the point where irq_desc lock has been released.
This adds chip_bus_lock/unlock() to the remove_irq() code path, but that's actually correct in the case where remove_irq() is called on such an interrupt. The current users of remove_irq() are not affected as none of those interrupts is on a chip which requires buslock.
--- kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
kernel/irq/manage.c +3 -3
@@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsiif (!desc)return NULL ; +chip_bus_lock (desc);raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&desc->lock, flags);/*
@@ -1242,7 +1243,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsiif (!action) {WARN (1 ,"Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n" , irq);raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&desc->lock, flags); - +chip_bus_sync_unlock (desc);return NULL ; }
@@ -1265,6 +1266,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsi#endif raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&desc->lock, flags); +chip_bus_sync_unlock (desc);unregister_handler_proc (irq, action);
@@ -1338,9 +1340,7 @@ void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *de desc->affinity_notify =NULL ;#endif -chip_bus_lock (desc);kfree (__free_irq (irq, dev_id)); -chip_bus_sync_unlock (desc); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (free_irq);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-3.10/genirq-prevent-chip-buslock-deadlock.patch