spl: Remove bogus GD_FLG_SPL_INIT check
PATCH 1/2 spl: Remove bogus GD_FLG_SPL_INIT check
Remove the check for GD_FLG_SPL_INIT in spl_relocate_stack_gd(). The check will always fail. This is because spl_relocate_stack_gd() is called from ARM's crt0.S and it is called before board_init_r(). The board_init_r() calls spl_init(), which sets the GD_FLG_SPL_INIT flag.
Note that reserving the malloc area in RAM is not a problem even if the GD_FLG_SPL_INIT flag is not set.
--- common/spl/spl.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
common/spl/spl.c +0 -3
@@ -486,9 +486,6 @@ ulong spl_relocate_stack_gd(void)#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE if (CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN ) { -if (!(gd->flags &GD_FLG_SPL_INIT )) -panic_str ("spl_init must be called before heap reloc" ); - ptr -=CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN ; gd->malloc_base = ptr; gd->malloc_limit =CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
--- configs/socfpga_arria5_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_cyclone5_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_mcvevk_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_sockit_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_socrates_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_sr1500_defconfig | 2 ++ configs/socfpga_vining_fpga_defconfig | 2 ++ include/configs/socfpga_common.h | 3 --- 9 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
configs/socfpga_arria5_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA5_SOCDK=y
configs/socfpga_cyclone5_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5_SOCDK=y
configs/socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO=y
configs/socfpga_mcvevk_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_DENX_MCVEVK=y
configs/socfpga_sockit_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT=y
configs/socfpga_socrates_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_EBV_SOCRATES=y
configs/socfpga_sr1500_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500=y
configs/socfpga_vining_fpga_defconfig +2 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y +CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y CONFIG_SPL_DM=y CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_SAMTEC_VINING_FPGA=y
include/configs/socfpga_common.h +0 -3
@@ -324,9 +324,6 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void);#define CONFIG_SPL_RAM_DEVICE #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR#define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE (64 * 1024) -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD -#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE -#endif #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Stefan
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 11 lines · Stefan Roese
Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
Thanks
Chin Liang
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks,
Stefan
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 10 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 9 lines · Stefan Roese
Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Reviewed-by Stefan Roese <[email protected]>Acked-by Chin Liang See <[email protected]>
Applied both to u-boot-socfpga/master
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Marek Vasut
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
In reply to Marek VasutHi,
Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
I tried to use the raw MMC boot (on the sockit, with current master
+ your patches), so I changed the following:
include/configs/socfpga_common.h +0 -0
@@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void);
#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot-dtb.img" #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
#else
-#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 3
-#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0xa00 /* offset 2560 sect (1M+256k) */
-#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 800 /* 400 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION 3 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0x200 /* offset 512 sect (256k) */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 1000 /* 512 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
#endif
#endif
AFAIK, there were two mistakes:
1) FS_BOOT_PARTITION instead of RAW_MODE_U_BOOT
2) CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT was missing
(I edited the offset to be able to use u-boot-with-spl.sfp directly)
With these settings, I think we run into the size problem reported previously in the ML.
So, enabling tiny printf could help, but we now get:
disk/built-in.o: In function `part_get_info_extended':...u-boot/disk/part_dos.c:236: undefined reference to `sprintf'
So I think we can just put "info->name[0] = 0;" instead of the snprintf() calls, when using tiny printf.
I can submit those changes as two patches if it makes sense.
Thanks,
Sylvain
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 1 line · Sylvain Lesne
Hi,
Hi,
Quoted 24 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 7 lines
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>I tried to use the raw MMC boot (on the sockit, with current master
+ your patches), so I changed the following:include/configs/socfpga_common.h +0
-2@@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void);#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot-dtb.img"#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT #else -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 3 -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0xa00/* offset 2560 sect (1M+256k) */
include/configs/socfpga_common.h +2
-1-#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 800/* 400 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION 3 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0x200/* offset 512
Quoted 2 lines
sect (256k) */
+#defineCONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS1000 /* 512 KB */
This should be 0x800 (was probably a typo in the original). Otherwise this should not break anything, yeah.
Quoted 7 lines
+#define
CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
#endif
#endifAFAIK, there were two mistakes:
1)FS_BOOT_PARTITIONinstead ofRAW_MODE_U_BOOT
2)CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORTwas missing
In fact, LIBDISK support was not used before you added the CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION into the board config. The libdisk functions are needed for determining the start of the partition. Looking through the SPL MMC, the code originally loaded the u-boot image from a fixed offset on the card (2560 sectors), which is indeed not optimal.
So yes, please send the above patch, it'd be a nice improvement.
Quoted 5 lines
(I edited the offset to be able to use u-boot-with-spl.sfp directly)
With these settings, I think we run into the size problem reported previously in the ML.
Quoted 7 lines
So, enabling tiny printf could help, but we now get:
disk/built-in.o: In function `part_get_info_extended':...u-boot/disk/part_dos.c:236: undefined reference to `sprintf'So I think we can just put "info->name[0] = 0;" instead of the
snprintf()calls, when using tiny printf.
There is more of that stuff in disk/ , at least part_efi.c and part_iso.c suffer from the exact same problem. I am not sure if setting the name to '\0' wouldn't break anything, CCing Simon as he was recently digging in those areas.
Also, take a look at this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626760/
Quoted 1 line
I can submit those changes as two patches if it makes sense.
Please do.
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks,
Sylvain
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Marek Vasut
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 26 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 1 line · Sylvain Lesne
Hi,
Hi,
Quoted 21 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 7 lines
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>I tried to use the raw MMC boot (on the sockit, with current master
+ your patches), so I changed the following:include/configs/socfpga_common.h +0
-2@@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void);#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot-dtb.img"#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT #else -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 3 -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0xa00/* offset 2560 sect (1M+256k) */
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
include/configs/socfpga_common.h +2
-1-#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 800/* 400 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION 3 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0x200/* offset 512 sect (256k) */
+#defineCONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS1000 /* 512 KB */This should be
0x800(was probably a typo in the original). Otherwise this should not break anything, yeah.
I might be missing something obvious, but it actually seems that this define isn't used outside of the include/configs/ folder...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
+#define
CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
#endif
#endifAFAIK, there were two mistakes:
1)FS_BOOT_PARTITIONinstead ofRAW_MODE_U_BOOT
2)CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORTwas missing
Quoted 7 lines
In fact, LIBDISK support was not used before you added the
CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITIONinto the board config. The libdisk functions are needed for determining the start of the partition. Looking through the SPL MMC, the code originally loaded the u-boot image from a fixed offset on the card (2560 sectors), which is indeed not optimal.
I agree, but I thought that the CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION option was a bit confusing in this context! And I did not realise the behaviour would be to load from a fixed offset.
As soon as the tiny printf "issue" is solved, I'll send this patch (as I don't want to break the build).
Quoted 15 lines
So yes, please send the above patch, it'd be a nice improvement.
Quoted 5 lines
(I edited the offset to be able to use u-boot-with-spl.sfp directly)
With these settings, I think we run into the size problem reported previously in the ML.
Quoted 7 lines
So, enabling tiny printf could help, but we now get:
disk/built-in.o: In function `part_get_info_extended':...u-boot/disk/part_dos.c:236: undefined reference to `sprintf'So I think we can just put "info->name[0] = 0;" instead of the
snprintf()calls, when using tiny printf.
Quoted 7 lines
There is more of that stuff in disk/ , at least
part_efi.candpart_iso.csuffer from the exact same problem. I am not sure if setting the name to '\0' wouldn't break anything, CCing Simon as he was recently digging in those areas.Also, take a look at this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626760/
Ah yes, I naively only looked at the part_dos.c file. Actually a tiny snprintf implementation by Simon was already merged!
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=5c411d88be8df5f6a8a1ea0c961f7c35ba82c064
If I implement a naive sprintf() using this as a basis, I can boot from MMC without tweaking anything else, but it adds ~730 bytes to tiny-printf.o.
Thanks!
Sylvain
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I can submit those changes as two patches if it makes sense.
Please do.
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
Quoted 37 lines · Sylvain Lesne
Quoted 26 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 1 line · Sylvain Lesne
Hi,
Hi,
Quoted 21 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 7 lines
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>I tried to use the raw MMC boot (on the sockit, with current master
+ your patches), so I changed the following:include/configs/socfpga_common.h +0
-2@@ -349,9 +349,10 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void);#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME "u-boot-dtb.img"#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT #else -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION 3 -#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0xa00/* offset 2560 sect (1M+256k) */
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
include/configs/socfpga_common.h +2
-1-#define CONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS 800/* 400 KB */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITION 3 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR 0x200/* offset 512 sect (256k) */
+#defineCONFIG_SYS_U_BOOT_MAX_SIZE_SECTORS1000 /* 512 KB */This should be
0x800(was probably a typo in the original). Otherwise this should not break anything, yeah.
Quoted 2 lines
I might be missing something obvious, but it actually seems that this define isn't used outside of the
include/configs/folder...
Oh heh, good catch. If you want to nuke that one in include/configs/, be my guest. The mmc spl is now parsing the uImage header to load the right amount of data.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
+#define
CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
#endif
#endifAFAIK, there were two mistakes:
1)FS_BOOT_PARTITIONinstead ofRAW_MODE_U_BOOT
2)CONFIG_SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORTwas missingQuoted 7 lines
In fact, LIBDISK support was not used before you added the
CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_PARTITIONinto the board config. The libdisk functions are needed for determining the start of the partition. Looking through the SPL MMC, the code originally loaded the u-boot image from a fixed offset on the card (2560 sectors), which is indeed not optimal.
Quoted 6 lines
I agree, but I thought that the
CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITIONoption was a bit confusing in this context! And I did not realise the behaviour would be to load from a fixed offset.As soon as the tiny printf "issue" is solved, I'll send this patch (as I don't want to break the build).
I think I will just pick these patches here, you can apply them and send whatever you have.
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 15 lines
So yes, please send the above patch, it'd be a nice improvement.
Quoted 5 lines
(I edited the offset to be able to use u-boot-with-spl.sfp directly)
With these settings, I think we run into the size problem reported previously in the ML.
Quoted 7 lines
So, enabling tiny printf could help, but we now get:
disk/built-in.o: In function `part_get_info_extended':...u-boot/disk/part_dos.c:236: undefined reference to `sprintf'So I think we can just put "info->name[0] = 0;" instead of the
snprintf()calls, when using tiny printf.Quoted 7 lines
There is more of that stuff in disk/ , at least
part_efi.candpart_iso.csuffer from the exact same problem. I am not sure if setting the name to '\0' wouldn't break anything, CCing Simon as he was recently digging in those areas.Also, take a look at this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626760/
Quoted 8 lines
Ah yes, I naively only looked at the
part_dos.cfile. Actually a tiny snprintf implementation by Simon was already merged!http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=5c411d88be8df5f6a8a1ea0c961f7c35ba82c064
If I implement a naive
sprintf()using this as a basis, I can boot from MMC without tweaking anything else, but it adds ~730 bytes to tiny-printf.o.
I suppose the naive implementation would be calling snprintf() with size = ~0 ? Go for it.
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards, Marek Vasut
PATCH 2/2 arm: socfpga: Enable tiny printf and simple malloc in SPL
In reply to Marek VasutQuoted 5 lines · Marek Vasut
Enable both features to reduce the SPL size by 6 kiB.
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
PATCH 1/2 spl: Remove bogus GD_FLG_SPL_INIT check
In reply to Marek VasutQuoted 9 lines · Marek Vasut
Remove the check for
GD_FLG_SPL_INITinspl_relocate_stack_gd(). The check will always fail. This is becausespl_relocate_stack_gd()is called from ARM'scrt0.Sand it is called beforeboard_init_r(). Theboard_init_r()callsspl_init(), which sets theGD_FLG_SPL_INITflag.Note that reserving the malloc area in RAM is not a problem even if the
GD_FLG_SPL_INITflag is not set.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Hans de Goede <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>Cc Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Stefan
PATCH 1/2 spl: Remove bogus GD_FLG_SPL_INIT check
Quoted 18 lines · Stefan Roese
Quoted 9 lines · Marek Vasut
Remove the check for
GD_FLG_SPL_INITinspl_relocate_stack_gd(). The check will always fail. This is becausespl_relocate_stack_gd()is called from ARM'scrt0.Sand it is called beforeboard_init_r(). Theboard_init_r()callsspl_init(), which sets theGD_FLG_SPL_INITflag.Note that reserving the malloc area in RAM is not a problem even if the
GD_FLG_SPL_INITflag is not set.Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Hans de Goede <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>Cc Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Quoted 2 lines
Reviewed-by Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
Thanks
Chin Liang
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks,
Stefan
PATCH 1/2 spl: Remove bogus GD_FLG_SPL_INIT check
In reply to Marek VasutQuoted 9 lines · Marek Vasut
Remove the check for
GD_FLG_SPL_INITinspl_relocate_stack_gd(). The check will always fail. This is becausespl_relocate_stack_gd()is called from ARM'scrt0.Sand it is called beforeboard_init_r(). Theboard_init_r()callsspl_init(), which sets theGD_FLG_SPL_INITflag.Note that reserving the malloc area in RAM is not a problem even if the
GD_FLG_SPL_INITflag is not set.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>Cc Chin Liang See <[email protected]>Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>Cc Hans de Goede <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Stefan Roese <[email protected]>Cc Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html