Patch "ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-reference-counting-bug-on-block-allocation-error.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77eMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:02:47 -0400
Subject: ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
From: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
commit 554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e upstream.
If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or errors=remount-ro:
EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata
then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call here since we are still actually using the allocation context.
Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems safer.
[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]
--- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 17 +++-------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/mballoc.c +3 -14
@@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_ext4_error (sb,"Allocating blocks %llu-%llu which overlap " "fs metadata" , block, block+len);/* File system mounted not to panic on error -* Fix the bitmap and repeat the block allocation +* Fix the bitmap and return EFSCORRUPTED * We leak some of the blocks here. */ ext4_lock_group (sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
@@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_ext4_unlock_group (sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); err =ext4_handle_dirty_metadata (handle,NULL , bitmap_bh);if (!err) - err = -EAGAIN ; + err = -EFSCORRUPTED ; goto out_err; }
@@ -4513,18 +4513,7 @@ repeat: }if (likely (ac->ac_status ==AC_STATUS_FOUND )) { *errp =ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used (ac, handle, reserv_clstrs); -if (*errp == -EAGAIN ) { -/* -* drop the reference that we took -* in ext4_mb_use_best_found -*/ -ext4_mb_release_context (ac); - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group =0 ; - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start =0 ; - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len =0 ; - ac->ac_status =AC_STATUS_CONTINUE ; - goto repeat; - }else if (*errp) { +if (*errp) {ext4_discard_allocated_blocks (ac); goto errout; }else {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.6/ext4-short-cut-orphan-cleanup-on-error.patch queue-4.6/block-fix-use-after-free-in-seq-file.patch queue-4.6/ext4-check-for-extents-that-wrap-around.patch queue-4.6/net-irda-fix-null-pointer-dereference-on-memory-allocation-failure.patch queue-4.6/ext4-validate-s_reserved_gdt_blocks-on-mount.patch queue-4.6/ext4-don-t-call-ext4_should_journal_data-on-the-journal-inode.patch queue-4.6/ext4-fix-reference-counting-bug-on-block-allocation-error.patch