f2fs: do in batch synchronously readahead during GC
Chao Yu
maintainerPATCH 1/2 f2fs: do in batch synchronously readahead during GC
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
In order to enhance performance, we try to readahead node page during GC, but before loading node page we should get block address of node page which is stored in NAT table, so synchronously read of single NAT page block our readahead flow.
f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xa1e, oldaddr = 0xa1e, newaddr = 0xa1e, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x35e9, oldaddr = 0x72d7a, newaddr = 0x72d7a, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc1f, oldaddr = 0xc1f, newaddr = 0xc1f, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x389d, oldaddr = 0x72d7d, newaddr = 0x72d7d, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x3a82, oldaddr = 0x72d7f, newaddr = 0x72d7f, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x3bfa, oldaddr = 0x72d86, newaddr = 0x72d86, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODE
This patch adds one phase that do readahead NAT pages in batch before readahead node page for more effeciently.
f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0x1952, oldaddr = 0x1952, newaddr = 0x1952, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc34, oldaddr = 0xc34, newaddr = 0xc34, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xa33, oldaddr = 0xa33, newaddr = 0xa33, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc30, oldaddr = 0xc30, newaddr = 0xc30, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc32, oldaddr = 0xc32, newaddr = 0xc32, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc26, oldaddr = 0xc26, newaddr = 0xc26, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xa2b, oldaddr = 0xa2b, newaddr = 0xa2b, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc23, oldaddr = 0xc23, newaddr = 0xc23, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc24, oldaddr = 0xc24, newaddr = 0xc24, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xa10, oldaddr = 0xa10, newaddr = 0xa10, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_mbio: dev = (251,0), ino = 2, page_index = 0xc2c, oldaddr = 0xc2c, newaddr = 0xc2c, rw = READ_SYNC(MP), type = METAf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5db7, oldaddr = 0x6be00, newaddr = 0x6be00, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5db9, oldaddr = 0x6be17, newaddr = 0x6be17, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5dbc, oldaddr = 0x6be1a, newaddr = 0x6be1a, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5dc3, oldaddr = 0x6be20, newaddr = 0x6be20, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5dc7, oldaddr = 0x6be24, newaddr = 0x6be24, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODEf2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (251,0), ino = 1, page_index = 0x5dc9, oldaddr = 0x6be25, newaddr = 0x6be25, rw = READAHEAD ^H, type = NODE
--- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/gc.c +23 -10
@@ -423,10 +423,10 @@ static int check_valid_map(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,static void gc_node_segment (struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,struct f2fs_summary *sum,unsigned int segno,int gc_type) { -bool initial = true;struct f2fs_summary *entry;block_t start_addr;int off; +int phase =0 ; start_addr =START_BLOCK (sbi, segno);
@@ -445,10 +445,18 @@ next_step:if (check_valid_map (sbi, segno, off) ==0 )continue ; -if (initial) { +if (phase ==0 ) { +ra_meta_pages (sbi,NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET (nid),1 , +META_NAT , true); +continue ; + } + +if (phase ==1 ) {ra_node_page (sbi, nid);continue ; } + +/* phase == 2 */ node_page =get_node_page (sbi, nid);if (IS_ERR (node_page))continue ;
@@ -469,10 +477,8 @@ next_step:stat_inc_node_blk_count (sbi,1 , gc_type); } -if (initial) { - initial = false; +if (++phase <3 ) goto next_step; - } }/*
@@ -706,6 +712,7 @@ next_step:struct node_info dni;/* dnode info for the data */ unsigned int ofs_in_node, nofs;block_t start_bidx; +nid_t nid =le32_to_cpu (entry->nid);/* stop BG_GC if there is not enough free sections. */ if (gc_type ==BG_GC &&has_not_enough_free_secs (sbi,0 ))
@@ -715,7 +722,13 @@ next_step:continue ;if (phase ==0 ) { -ra_node_page (sbi,le32_to_cpu (entry->nid)); +ra_meta_pages (sbi,NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET (nid),1 , +META_NAT , true); +continue ; + } + +if (phase ==1 ) { +ra_node_page (sbi, nid);continue ; }
@@ -723,14 +736,14 @@ next_step:if (!is_alive (sbi, entry, &dni, start_addr + off, &nofs))continue ; -if (phase ==1 ) { +if (phase ==2 ) {ra_node_page (sbi, dni.ino);continue ; } ofs_in_node =le16_to_cpu (entry->ofs_in_node); -if (phase ==2 ) { +if (phase ==3 ) { inode =f2fs_iget (sb, dni.ino);if (IS_ERR (inode) ||is_bad_inode (inode))continue ;
@@ -756,7 +769,7 @@ next_step:continue ; } -/* phase 3 */ +/* phase 4 */ inode =find_gc_inode (gc_list, dni.ino);if (inode) {struct f2fs_inode_info *fi =F2FS_I (inode);
@@ -789,7 +802,7 @@ next_step: } } -if (++phase <4 ) +if (++phase <5 ) goto next_step; }
Signature · 4 lines
2.7.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chao Yu
maintainerPATCH 2/2 f2fs: fix to update node page under cp_rwsem
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Update node page under cp_rwsem in order to keep data consistency during writting checkpoint.
--- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/f2fs/inode.c +4 -1
@@ -377,8 +377,11 @@ retry: goto retry; } -if (err) +if (err) { +f2fs_lock_op (sbi);update_inode_page (inode); +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); + }sb_end_intwrite (inode->i_sb); no_delete:stat_dec_inline_xattr (inode);
Signature · 4 lines
2.7.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaegeuk Kim
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to update node page under cp_rwsem
Quoted 15 lines · Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Update node page under
cp_rwsemin order to keep data consistency during writting checkpoint.Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>--- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0
fs/f2fs/inode.c retry: · line 384
Quoted 9 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +4
-1@@ -377,8 +377,11 @@ retry: goto retry; } -if (err) +if (err) { +f2fs_lock_op (sbi);update_inode_page (inode); +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); + }
Any corner case?
Now, it allows updating node page when checkpoint is doing.
Thanks,
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0sb_end_intwrite (inode->i_sb); no_delete:stat_dec_inline_xattr (inode);Signature · 1 line
2.7.2
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to update node page under cp_rwsem
Quoted 19 lines · Jaegeuk Kim
Quoted 18 lines · Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Update node page under
cp_rwsemin order to keep data consistency during writting checkpoint.Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>--- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0@@ -377,8 +377,11 @@ retry: goto retry; }
Quoted 8 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c retry: · line 384
Quoted 6 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +4
-1-if (err) +if (err) { +f2fs_lock_op (sbi);update_inode_page (inode); +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); + }Any corner case?
No, just follow the old rule.
Quoted 1 line
Now, it allows updating node page when checkpoint is doing.
Oh, so for current rule, during checkpoint it:
1. allows updating meta info of inode which is not related to metadata of filesystem (e.g. i_size, i_block, i_nlink..)
2. does not allow updating meta info of inode which is related to metadata of filesystem (i_addr, i_nid..)
Is my understanding right?
Thanks,
Quoted 11 lines
Thanks,
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0sb_end_intwrite (inode->i_sb); no_delete:stat_dec_inline_xattr (inode);Signature · 1 line
2.7.2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaegeuk Kim
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to update node page under cp_rwsem
Quoted 31 lines · Chao Yu
Quoted 19 lines · Jaegeuk Kim
Quoted 18 lines · Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Update node page under
cp_rwsemin order to keep data consistency during writting checkpoint.Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>--- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0@@ -377,8 +377,11 @@ retry: goto retry; }Quoted 8 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c retry: · line 384
Quoted 6 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +4
-1-if (err) +if (err) { +f2fs_lock_op (sbi);update_inode_page (inode); +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); + }Any corner case?
No, just follow the old rule.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Now, it allows updating node page when checkpoint is doing.
Oh, so for current rule, during checkpoint it:
1. allows updating meta info of inode which is not related to metadata of filesystem (e.g.i_size,i_block,i_nlink..)
2. does not allow updating meta info of inode which is related to metadata of filesystem (i_addr,i_nid..)
Seems like that.
The checkpoint flushes any dirty inodes by block_operations. And, this is to allow any meta updates in its inode page which doesn't hurt current processing checkpoint.
Thanks,
Quoted 16 lines
Is my understanding right?
Thanks,
Quoted 11 lines
Thanks,
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/inode.c +0
-0sb_end_intwrite (inode->i_sb); no_delete:stat_dec_inline_xattr (inode);Signature · 1 line
2.7.2.