bb.runqueue: fix unexpected process death logic
PATCH 1/1 bb.runqueue: fix unexpected process death logic
From: Christopher Larson <[email protected]>
if w in self.rq.worker when w *is* self.rq.worker doesn't make a great deal of sense, and results in this error:
File ".../poky/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py", line 2372, in runQueuePipe.read():
name = None
> if w in self.rq.worker:
name = "Worker"
TypeError: unhashable type: 'dict'
Most likely this was meant to be 'is' rather than 'in', but rather than checking after the fact, just include the name in the iteration, instead.
While we're here, also clean up and fix the broken error message.
--- lib/bb/runqueue.py | 15 +++++---------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
lib/bb/runqueue.py +5 -10
@@ -2365,16 +2365,11 @@ class runQueuePipe(): self.rqexec = rqexec def read(self): - for w in [self.rq.worker, self.rq.fakeworker]: - for mc in w: - w[mc].process.poll() - if w[mc].process.returncode is not None and not self.rq.teardown: - name = None - if w in self.rq.worker: - name = "Worker" - elif w in self.rq.fakeworker: - name = "Fakeroot" - bb.error("%s process (%s) exited unexpectedly (%s), shutting down..." % (name, w.pid, str(w.returncode))) + for workers, name in [(self.rq.worker, "Worker"), (self.rq.fakeworker, "Fakeroot")]: + for worker in workers.values(): + worker.process.poll() + if worker.process.returncode is not None and not self.rq.teardown: + bb.error("%s process (%s) exited unexpectedly (%s), shutting down..." % (name, worker.process.pid, str(worker.process.returncode))) self.rq.finish_runqueue(True) start = len(self.queue)
Signature · 1 line
2.8.0
Quoted 13 lines · Christopher Larson
From: Christopher Larson <[email protected]>
if w in self.rq.workerwhen w *is* self.rq.worker doesn't make a great deal
of sense, and results in this error:File ".../poky/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py", line 2372, in
runQueuePipe.read():
name = None
> if w in self.rq.worker:
name = "Worker"
TypeError: unhashable type: 'dict'
Quoted 7 lines
Most likely this was meant to be 'is' rather than 'in', but rather than checking after the fact, just include the name in the iteration, instead.
While we're here, also clean up and fix the broken error message.
Signed-off-by Christopher Larson <[email protected]>
Ah, no, it wasn’t meant to be is, clearly this was a missed w -> w[mc] replacement, so it was meant to be in, just with a different value. Still worth simplifying that handling a bit, regardless :)
Signature · 5 lines
Christopher Larson kergoth at gmail dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics