Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Add support for Stratix 10 SoC

PATCH New Chin Liang See 4 participants 46 messages Oct 13, 2016 – Oct 18, 2016

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v3 cover Add support for Stratix 10 SoC

Add support for Stratix 10 SoC which is ARM64 based. This series of patches are tested with Stratix 10 SOC Virtual Platform that is available today.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
Chin Liang See (12):
arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address
arm: socfpga: rstmgr: Add Reset Manager for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: rstmgr: Separate the Reset Manager for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: misc: Separate the misc.c for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: sysmgr: Disable System Manager for Stratix 10
arm: socfpga: mmu: Add memory map layout for Stratix 10 SoC
arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add board directory for Stratix 10 socdk
arm: dts: socfpga: Add dts for Stratix 10 socdk
arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC
arm: socfpga: Add support for Stratix 10 SoC dev kit

 arch/arm/Kconfig                                   |   4 +-
 arch/arm/dts/Makefile                              |   3 +-
 arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts           |  71 +++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig                      |  10 ++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile                     |  13 +-
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c              |   8 +
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h |  48 ++++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h |  32 ++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c                       |  12 ++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mmu-arm64.c                  |  71 +++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager.c              |  12 ++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c                        |  13 +-
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS           |   7 +
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile              |   7 +
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c             |   7 +
 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig                |  21 +++
 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h          | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++
 17 files changed, 498 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mmu-arm64.c
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c
 create mode 100644 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
 create mode 100644 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h

--
2.2.2

#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address

Add base address header file for Stratix10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h new file +48 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd29a59
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#ifndef _SOCFPGA_S10_BASE_HARDWARE_H_
+#define _SOCFPGA_S10_BASE_HARDWARE_H_
+
+#define SOCFPGA_SMMU_ADDRESS			0xfa000000
+#define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS			0xff800000
+#define SOCFPGA_EMAC1_ADDRESS			0xff802000
+#define SOCFPGA_EMAC2_ADDRESS			0xff804000
+#define SOCFPGA_SDMMC_ADDRESS			0xff808000
+#define SOCFPGA_USB0_ADDRESS			0xffb00000
+#define SOCFPGA_USB1_ADDRESS			0xffb40000
+#define SOCFPGA_NANDREGS_ADDRESS		0xffb80000
+#define SOCFPGA_NANDDATA_ADDRESS		0xffb90000
+#define SOCFPGA_UART0_ADDRESS			0xffc02000
+#define SOCFPGA_UART1_ADDRESS			0xffc02100
+#define SOCFPGA_I2C0_ADDRESS			0xffc02800
+#define SOCFPGA_I2C1_ADDRESS			0xffc02900
+#define SOCFPGA_I2C2_ADDRESS			0xffc02a00
+#define SOCFPGA_I2C3_ADDRESS			0xffc02b00
+#define SOCFPGA_I2C4_ADDRESS			0xffc02c00
+#define SOCFPGA_SPTIMER0_ADDRESS		0xffc03000
+#define SOCFPGA_SPTIMER1_ADDRESS		0xffc03100
+#define SOCFPGA_GPIO0_ADDRESS			0xffc03200
+#define SOCFPGA_GPIO1_ADDRESS			0xffc03300
+#define SOCFPGA_SYSTIMER0_ADDRESS		0xffd00000
+#define SOCFPGA_SYSTIMER1_ADDRESS		0xffd00100
+#define SOCFPGA_L4WD0_ADDRESS			0xffd00200
+#define SOCFPGA_L4WD1_ADDRESS			0xffd00300
+#define SOCFPGA_L4WD2_ADDRESS			0xffd00400
+#define SOCFPGA_L4WD3_ADDRESS			0xffd00500
+#define SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS			0xffd10000
+#define SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS			0xffd11000
+#define SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS			0xffd12000
+#define SOCFPGA_PINMUX_DEDICATED_IO_ADDRESS	0xffd13000
+#define SOCFPGA_DMANONSECURE_ADDRESS		0xffda0000
+#define SOCFPGA_DMASECURE_ADDRESS		0xffda1000
+#define SOCFPGA_SPIS0_ADDRESS			0xffda2000
+#define SOCFPGA_SPIS1_ADDRESS			0xffda3000
+#define SOCFPGA_SPIM0_ADDRESS			0xffda4000
+#define SOCFPGA_SPIM1_ADDRESS			0xffda5000
+#define SOCFPGA_OCRAM_ADDRESS			0xffe00000
+
+#endif /* _SOCFPGA_S10_BASE_HARDWARE_H_ */
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address

Quoted 8 lines · Chin Liang See

Add base address header file for Stratix10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
Quoted 5 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h

OK, V3 patch, but where's the changelog ? ;-)

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#3 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address

Quoted 17 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 9 lines · Chin Liang See

Add base address header file for Stratix10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h | 48
++++++++++++++++++++++
?1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
?create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach- socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h

Quoted 2 lines

OK, V3 patch, but where's the changelog ? ;-)

Oh I just added the changelog if particular patch is modified. For this patch 1/12, no change for v2 to v3 :)

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 14 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#4 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address

Quoted 18 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 17 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 16 lines · Chin Liang See

Add base address header file for Stratix10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h | 48
++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-

socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

OK, V3 patch, but where's the changelog ? ;-)

Oh I just added the changelog if particular patch is modified. For this patch 1/12, no change for v2 to v3 :)

OK, got it.

[...]

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

Confidentiality Notice.

Oh yeah ?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#5 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add SOCFPGA Stratix10 base address

Quoted 27 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 21 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 19 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 17 lines · Chin Liang See

Add base address header file for Stratix10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h | 48
++++++++++++++++++++++
?1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
?create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach- socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_s10.h

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

OK, V3 patch, but where's the changelog ? ;-)

Oh I just added the changelog if particular patch is modified. For this
patch 1/12, no change for v2 to v3 :)

Quoted 9 lines

OK, got it.

[...]

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Confidentiality Notice.

Oh yeah ?

Strange as I didn't see this when using Intel email send to my gmail. In this case, better use back my old altera.com while sorting with IT.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines

This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#6 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/12 arm: socfpga: rstmgr: Add Reset Manager for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add Reset Manager registers structure for Stratix 10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h +32 -0
index 2f070f2..1f868da 100644
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ void socfpga_bridges_reset(int enable);
 void socfpga_per_reset(u32 reset, int set);
 void socfpga_per_reset_all(void);
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 struct socfpga_reset_manager {
 	u32	status;
 	u32	ctrl;
@@ -28,11 +29,42 @@ struct socfpga_reset_manager {
 	u32	padding2[12];
 	u32	tstscratch;
 };
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+struct socfpga_reset_manager {
+	u32	status;
+	u32	mpu_rst_stat;
+	u32	misc_stat;
+	u32	padding1;
+	u32	hdsk_en;
+	u32	hdsk_req;
+	u32	hdsk_ack;
+	u32	hdsk_stall;
+	u32     mpu_mod_reset;
+	u32     per_mod_reset;  /* stated as per0_mod_reset in S10 datasheet */
+	u32     per2_mod_reset; /* stated as per1_mod_reset in S10 datasheet */
+	u32     brg_mod_reset;
+	u32	padding2;
+	u32     cold_mod_reset;
+	u32	padding3;
+	u32     dbg_mod_reset;
+	u32     tap_mod_reset;
+	u32	padding4;
+	u32	padding5;
+	u32     brg_warm_mask;
+	u32	padding6[3];
+	u32     tst_stat;
+	u32	padding7;
+	u32     hdsk_timeout;
+	u32     mpul2flushtimeout;
+	u32     dbghdsktimeout;
+};
+#endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SOCFPGA_VIRTUAL_TARGET)
 #define RSTMGR_CTRL_SWWARMRSTREQ_LSB 2
 #else
 #define RSTMGR_CTRL_SWWARMRSTREQ_LSB 1
+#define RSTMGR_MPUMODRST_CORE0 1
 #endif
 
 /*
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#7 lore raw

PATCH v3 3/12 arm: socfpga: rstmgr: Separate the Reset Manager for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Separate the Reset Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager.c +12 -0
index b6beaa2..0fa5f1a 100644
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
 static const struct socfpga_reset_manager *reset_manager_base =
 		(void *)SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS;
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs =
 	(struct socfpga_system_manager *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS;
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) */
 
 /* Assert or de-assert SoCFPGA reset manager reset. */
 void socfpga_per_reset(u32 reset, int set)
@@ -31,8 +33,10 @@ void socfpga_per_reset(u32 reset, int set)
 		reg = &reset_manager_base->per2_mod_reset;
 	else if (RSTMGR_BANK(reset) == 3)
 		reg = &reset_manager_base->brg_mod_reset;
+#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 	else if (RSTMGR_BANK(reset) == 4)
 		reg = &reset_manager_base->misc_mod_reset;
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) */
 	else	/* Invalid reset register, do nothing */
 		return;
 
@@ -60,9 +64,15 @@ void socfpga_per_reset_all(void)
  */
 void reset_cpu(ulong addr)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	/* request a warm reset */
 	writel((1 << RSTMGR_CTRL_SWWARMRSTREQ_LSB),
 		&reset_manager_base->ctrl);
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	writel((1 << RSTMGR_MPUMODRST_CORE0),
+		&reset_manager_base->mpu_mod_reset);
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * infinite loop here as watchdog will trigger and reset
 	 * the processor
@@ -92,6 +102,7 @@ void socfpga_bridges_reset(int enable)
 
 void socfpga_bridges_reset(int enable)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	const uint32_t l3mask = L3REGS_REMAP_LWHPS2FPGA_MASK |
 				L3REGS_REMAP_HPS2FPGA_MASK |
 				L3REGS_REMAP_OCRAM_MASK;
@@ -116,5 +127,6 @@ void socfpga_bridges_reset(int enable)
 		/* Remap the bridges into memory map */
 		writel(l3mask, SOCFPGA_L3REGS_ADDRESS);
 	}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) */
 }
 #endif
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#8 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +8 -0
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
 	(struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
 
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 	return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
 	/* identify the source of MMC clock */
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 	/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */
 	clock /= 4;
 	return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	return 25000000;
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
 	uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 	"display clocks",
 	""
 );
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#9 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 37 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +3 -0
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
 	(struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
 
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 	return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
 	/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void) · line 482

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 	/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */
 	clock /= 4;
 	return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
 	uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 	"display clocks",
 	""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions missing?

Maybe we should split the clock manager into common part and then gen5 and gen10 specific parts ?

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
 );
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#10 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 52 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 40 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++ ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base = ??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 ?unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 ?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 ??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 5 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */ ??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) +?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

Quoted 4 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 7 lines

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions missing?

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against emulation

Quoted 4 lines

Maybe we should split the clock manager into common part and then gen5
and gen10 specific parts ?

Ok, we can do that as initially we were worried too many files created within mach-socfpga.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 5 lines

?);
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#11 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 63 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 52 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 39 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +3 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
      (struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
 
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
      return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
      /* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c unsigned int · line 483

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
      /* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */
      clock /= 4;
      return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+     return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
      "display clocks",
      ""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions missing?

Quoted 2 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Maybe we should split the clock manager into common part and then gen5
and gen10 specific parts ?

Ok, we can do that as initially we were worried too many files created within mach-socfpga.

It's probably better than polluting the clock code with ifdefs.

[...]

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#12 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 70 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 69 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 67 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 43 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++ ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 ?unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 ?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 ??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 6 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */
??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) +?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

Quoted 11 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",
Quoted 1 line

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions missing?

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation platform.

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Maybe we should split the clock manager into common part and then gen5
and gen10 specific parts ?

Ok, we can do that as initially we were worried too many files created
within mach-socfpga.

It's probably better than polluting the clock code with ifdefs.

Ok, we have an consensus then

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 3 lines

[...]

#13 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 71 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 70 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 69 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 67 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 47 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base

=

      (struct socfpga_clock_manager *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
      return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
      /* identify the source of MMC clock */
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
      /* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at

wrapper */

      clock /= 4;
      return clock;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void) · line 482

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+     return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 12 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
      "display clocks",
      ""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions missing?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation platform.

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values from registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Maybe we should split the clock manager into common part and then gen5
and gen10 specific parts ?

Ok, we can do that as initially we were worried too many files created
within mach-socfpga.

It's probably better than polluting the clock code with ifdefs.

Ok, we have an consensus then

OK

Quoted 7 lines

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 3 lines

[...]

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#14 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 84 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 83 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 81 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 79 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 63 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 46 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++ ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
*clock_manager_base
=
??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 ?unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 ?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 ??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 6 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at wrapper */
??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) +?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

Quoted 6 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against
emulation

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation
platform.

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values from registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take some significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Thanks
Chin Liang

[..]

#15 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 90 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 89 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 88 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 78 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 76 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 73 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 50 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
 *clock_manager_base

=
(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
      return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
      /* identify the source of MMC clock */
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
      /* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at

wrapper */

      clock /= 4;
      return clock;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+     return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP specific ?

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 13 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
      "display clocks",
      ""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation
platform.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values from registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take some significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not needed on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That should be simple, right ?

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#16 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 111 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 102 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 100 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 98 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 86 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 83 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 79 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 48 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++ ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
*clock_manager_base
=
??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 ?unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 ?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 ??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 7 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider at
wrapper */
??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) +?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 13 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",
Quoted 1 line

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation
platform.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Quoted 5 lines

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That should be
simple, right ?

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not sound right.?

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 5 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

#17 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 118 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 111 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 102 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 100 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 98 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 86 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 83 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 79 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 53 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
 *clock_manager_base

=
(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
      return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
      /* identify the source of MMC clock */
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
      /* further divide by 4 as we have fixed divider

at
wrapper */

      clock /= 4;
      return clock;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+     return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 12 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
      "display clocks",
      ""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in emulation
platform.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Quoted 5 lines

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That should be
simple, right ?

Quoted 3 lines

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not sound right.

Ha, I see. Is there some sane default for the SoCVP ?

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#18 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 136 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 135 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 133 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 119 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 107 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 104 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 100 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 89 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 74 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 50 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and
Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++ ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
*clock_manager_base
=
??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 ?unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 ?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 ??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 8 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed
divider
at
wrapper */
??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 8 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Quoted 4 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in
emulation
platform.

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values
from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Quoted 6 lines

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock
Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take
some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That should
be
simple, right ?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not sound
right.

Ha, I see. Is there some sane default for the SoCVP ?

It will not meaningful as performance is same even with frequency change :) But definitely will address this in coming weeks as I am already working on the emulation.?

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 4 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

#19 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 141 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 140 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 139 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 127 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 119 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 107 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 104 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 100 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 89 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 74 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 56 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5 SoC and
Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
 *clock_manager_base

=
(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
      return clock;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 unsigned int cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
 
      /* identify the source of MMC clock */
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
      /* further divide by 4 as we have fixed

divider
at
wrapper */

      clock /= 4;
      return clock;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +2 -0
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+     return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 8 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
}

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c U_BOOT_CMD( · line 564

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
 {
      uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
      "display clocks",
      ""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are some functions
missing?

Quoted 4 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage when testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing functionality now ?

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole in
emulation
platform.

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values
from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Quoted 6 lines

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full Clock
Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part take
some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Quoted 6 lines

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That should
be
simple, right ?

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not sound
right.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Ha, I see. Is there some sane default for the SoCVP ?

It will not meaningful as performance is same even with frequency change :) But definitely will address this in coming weeks as I am already working on the emulation.

I understand that, but I believe it is still better to provide some sensible value rather than just ifdef the whole code out.

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#20 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 172 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 171 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 169 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 167 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 150 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 139 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 130 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 121 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 107 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 102 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 95 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 57 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5
SoC
and
Stratix 10 SoC.

Quoted 1 line
Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]
Quoted 1 line
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8
++++++++
?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

(quoted diff) +0 -0

socfpga/clock_manager.c
b/arch/arm/mach-
socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 ?DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)

?static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
*clock_manager_base
=
??????(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +1 -0
@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
 
 ??????return clock;
 ?}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 

?unsigned int
cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

??????/* identify the source of MMC clock */

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
 cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
Quoted 8 lines

??????/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed
divider
at
wrapper */
??????clock /= 4;
??????return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+?????return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 16 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
?}

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
?unsigned int
cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
?{
??????uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c +0 -0
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 ??????"display clocks",
Quoted 1 line

??????""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are
some
functions
missing?

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage
when
testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing
functionality
now ?

Quoted 5 lines

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole
in
emulation
platform.

Quoted 5 lines

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values
from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Quoted 8 lines

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full
Clock
Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part
take
some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Quoted 8 lines

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not
needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That
should
be
simple, right ?

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is
uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not
sound
right.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Ha, I see. Is there some sane default for the SoCVP ?

It will not meaningful as performance is same even with frequency change :) But definitely will address this in coming weeks as I am already working on the emulation.?

I understand that, but I believe it is still better to provide some sensible value rather than just ifdef the whole code out.

I can hardcode some sensible value for that if good.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 1 line
#21 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/12 arm: socfpga: clkmgr: Separate the Clock Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 175 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 174 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 173 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 171 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 161 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 150 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 139 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 130 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 121 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 107 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 102 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 95 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 65 lines · Chin Liang See

Separate the Clock Manager to support both GEN5
SoC
and
Stratix 10 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <[email protected]

Cc: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]

Cc: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c | 8
++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-
socfpga/clock_manager.c
b/arch/arm/mach-
socfpga/clock_manager.c
index aa71636..0d67b3c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@

DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
static const struct socfpga_clock_manager
*clock_manager_base
=
(struct socfpga_clock_manager
*)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;

@@ -446,9 +447,11 @@ unsigned int
cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)

return clock;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */

unsigned int
cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
{
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
uint32_t reg, clock = 0;

/* identify the source of MMC clock */
@@ -475,8 +478,12 @@ unsigned int
cm_get_mmc_controller_clk_hz(void)
/* further divide by 4 as we have fixed
divider
at
wrapper */
clock /= 4;
return clock;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+ return 25000000;

Is this always gonna be the case or is this S10VP
specific ?

Quoted 17 lines

+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
}

+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
unsigned int
cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
{
uint32_t reg, clock = 0;
@@ -556,3 +563,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
"display clocks",
""

Why does the clock display not work on S10 ? Are
some
functions
missing?

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Not for SOCVP. But will be added in later stage
when
testing
against
emulation

How hard would it be to add this missing
functionality
now ?

Quoted 5 lines

That will take weeks as that need to be validated as whole
in
emulation
platform.

Quoted 5 lines

You mean printing a few clock information based on some values
from
registers would take weeks ? Why ?

Quoted 8 lines

Oh actually I am referring all the managers code such as full
Clock
Manager, Reset Manager ... plus testing. Testing is the part
take
some
significant time especially slow when come to emulation.

Quoted 8 lines

Just use empty functions for the clock init code (since it's not
needed
on the socvp) and populate the clock reporting functions. That
should
be
simple, right ?

Quoted 6 lines

Can be done but the value won't be meaningful as the register is
uninitialzied. Unless we hardcode to a hard value which might not
sound
right.

Ha, I see. Is there some sane default for the SoCVP ?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

It will not meaningful as performance is same even with frequency change :) But definitely will address this in coming weeks as I am already working on the emulation.

I understand that, but I believe it is still better to provide some sensible value rather than just ifdef the whole code out.

I can hardcode some sensible value for that if good.

I think it's better, yes. Thanks

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#22 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +3 -2
index 809cd47..a8ea277 100644
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@
 #
 
 obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o system_manager.o clock_manager.o \
-	   fpga_manager.o board.o
+	   board.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
 
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
-obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
+					   fpga_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#23 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 2 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only for SoCVP instead of S10 ?

Quoted 30 lines
Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +3 -2
index 809cd47..a8ea277 100644
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@
 #
 
 obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o system_manager.o clock_manager.o \
-	   fpga_manager.o board.o
+	   board.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
 
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
-obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
+					   fpga_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#24 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 3 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only for SoCVP instead of S10 ?

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation in later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to hardware once its available.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 51 lines
Quoted 25 lines
Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 5 +++--
?1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0

socfpga/Makefile
index 809cd47..a8ea277 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@

?#

?obj-y????????+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o system_manager.o clock_manager.o \
-????????fpga_manager.o board.o
+????????board.o

?obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o

Quoted 11 lines

?# QTS-generated config file wrappers -obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)????+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)????+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
+????????????????????????????????????????fpga_manager.o ?obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o??\
?????????????????????????wrap_sdram_config.o ?CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o???+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#25 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 5 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 4 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 3 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only for SoCVP instead of S10 ?

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation in later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to hardware once its available.

This is confusing, what would happen if someone tries to use old u-boot on real hardware ?

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#26 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 13 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 12 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 10 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 4 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only for
SoCVP instead of S10 ?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation in
later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to hardware once its available.

This is confusing, what would happen if someone tries to use old u- boot
on real hardware ?

It won't work until added drivers for Clocks, Reset and DDR. Current state would be good for SOCVP only where not all hardware is simulated.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 5 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

#27 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 19 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 18 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 17 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 10 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 4 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only for
SoCVP instead of S10 ?

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation in
later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to hardware once its available.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

This is confusing, what would happen if someone tries to use old u- boot
on real hardware ?

It won't work until added drivers for Clocks, Reset and DDR. Current state would be good for SOCVP only where not all hardware is simulated.

In that case, mark it as SoCVP to prevent confusion please.

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#28 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 32 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 31 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 29 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 16 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 6 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 3 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only
for
SoCVP instead of S10 ?

Quoted 7 lines

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation
in
later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to
hardware once its available.

This is confusing, what would happen if someone tries to use old u-
boot
on real hardware ?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

It won't work until added drivers for Clocks, Reset and DDR. Current
state would be good for SOCVP only where not all hardware is simulated.

In that case, mark it as SoCVP to prevent confusion please.

In this case, I can update the config to indicate this is S10 SOCVP.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 15 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#29 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/12 arm: socfpga: fpgamgr: Disable FPGA Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 33 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 32 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 31 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 29 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 16 lines · Chin Liang
Quoted 6 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 3 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Disable the FPGA Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

If it's not used on SoCVP, then shouldn't this be disabled only
for
SoCVP instead of S10 ?

Quoted 7 lines

We will be enhancing this code to support the hardware / emulation
in
later phase. In another word, will switch the support from SOCVP to
hardware once its available.

This is confusing, what would happen if someone tries to use old u-
boot
on real hardware ?

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

It won't work until added drivers for Clocks, Reset and DDR. Current
state would be good for SOCVP only where not all hardware is simulated.

In that case, mark it as SoCVP to prevent confusion please.

In this case, I can update the config to indicate this is S10 SOCVP.

Yes please.

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#30 lore raw

PATCH v3 6/12 arm: socfpga: misc: Separate the misc.c for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Separate the misc.c to support both GEN5 SoC and Stratix 10 SoC.

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c +12 -0
index 5cbd8a4..295121f 100644
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
+
 static struct pl310_regs *const pl310 =
 	(struct pl310_regs *)CONFIG_SYS_PL310_BASE;
 static struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs =
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ static struct nic301_registers *nic301_regs =
 	(struct nic301_registers *)SOCFPGA_L3REGS_ADDRESS;
 static struct scu_registers *scu_regs =
 	(struct scu_registers *)SOCFPGA_MPUSCU_ADDRESS;
+#endif
 
 int dram_init(void)
 {
@@ -41,6 +44,7 @@ int dram_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 void enable_caches(void)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF
@@ -246,6 +250,7 @@ static int socfpga_fpga_id(const bool print_id)
 		       socfpga_fpga_model[i].name, version);
 	return i;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 
 /*
  * Print CPU information
@@ -253,14 +258,20 @@ static int socfpga_fpga_id(const bool print_id)
 #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
 int print_cpuinfo(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 	const u32 bsel = readl(&sysmgr_regs->bootinfo) & 0x7;
 	puts("CPU:   Altera SoCFPGA Platform\n");
 	socfpga_fpga_id(1);
 	printf("BOOT:  %s\n", bsel_str[bsel].name);
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	puts("CPU:   Altera SoCFPGA Platform\n");
+	puts("FPGA:  Altera Stratix 10\n");
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT
 int arch_misc_init(void)
 {
@@ -469,3 +480,4 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 	"bridge disable - Enable HPS-to-FPGA, FPGA-to-HPS, LWHPS-to-FPGA bridges\n"
 	""
 );
+#endif /* CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 */
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#31 lore raw

PATCH v3 7/12 arm: socfpga: sysmgr: Disable System Manager for Stratix 10

In reply to Chin Liang See

Disable the System Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +2 -3
index a8ea277..71c17ca 100644
@@ -7,14 +7,13 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
 #
 
-obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o system_manager.o clock_manager.o \
-	   board.o
+obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
 
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
-					   fpga_manager.o
+					   fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#32 lore raw

PATCH v3 7/12 arm: socfpga: sysmgr: Disable System Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 2 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the System Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

So I wonder, shouldn't we introduce some bool Kconfig entry, something like CONFIG_SOCFPGA_HAS_SYSTEMMANAGER and then make each target (AV, CV, S10, S10SoCVP...) select whether it has it or not ? I think this might make things a bit cleaner.

Quoted 31 lines
Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +2 -3
index a8ea277..71c17ca 100644
@@ -7,14 +7,13 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
 #
 
-obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o system_manager.o clock_manager.o \
-	   board.o
+obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
 
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
-					   fpga_manager.o
+					   fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#33 lore raw

PATCH v3 7/12 arm: socfpga: sysmgr: Disable System Manager for Stratix 10

Quoted 11 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 3 lines · Chin Liang See

Disable the System Manager for Stratix 10 SoC as we are not using this for SOCVP

So I wonder, shouldn't we introduce some bool Kconfig entry, something
like CONFIG_SOCFPGA_HAS_SYSTEMMANAGER and then make each target (AV, CV,
S10, S10SoCVP...) select whether it has it or not ? I think this might
make things a bit cleaner.

This sound a good idea. Let's do this then.

Thanks
Chin Liang

[..]

#34 lore raw

PATCH v3 8/12 arm: socfpga: mmu: Add memory map layout for Stratix 10 SoC

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add memory map layout for Stratix 10 SoC

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile    |  2 ++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mmu-arm64.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mmu-arm64.c
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +2 -0
index 71c17ca..5038919 100644
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
 
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += mmu-arm64.o
+
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
 					   fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/mmu-arm64.c new file +71 -0

71 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#35 lore raw

PATCH v3 9/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add board directory for Stratix 10 socdk

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add board folder for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile    | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c   | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..596933c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+SOCFPGA BOARD
+M:	Chin-Liang See <[email protected]>
+M:	Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
+S:	Maintained
+F:	board/altera/stratix10-socdk/
+F:	include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
+F:	configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0c8024
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
+#
+
+obj-y	:= socfpga.o
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6778c04
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#36 lore raw

PATCH v3 9/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add board directory for Stratix 10 socdk

Quoted 1 line · Chin Liang See

Add board folder

directory

Quoted 49 lines

for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile    | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c   | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..596933c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+SOCFPGA BOARD
+M:	Chin-Liang See <[email protected]>
+M:	Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
+S:	Maintained
+F:	board/altera/stratix10-socdk/
+F:	include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
+F:	configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0c8024
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
+#
+
+obj-y	:= socfpga.o
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6778c04

board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c line 7

Quoted 7 lines
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +7 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>

Is this even needed or do we still need an empty file ?

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#37 lore raw

PATCH v3 9/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add board directory for Stratix 10 socdk

Quoted 5 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 2 lines · Chin Liang See

Add board folder

directory

Will fix this.

Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 53 lines

for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---

?board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
?board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile????| 7 +++++++
?board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c???| 7 +++++++

?3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
?create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS ?create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile ?create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c

board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..596933c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+SOCFPGA BOARD
+M:???Chin-Liang See <[email protected]>
+M:???Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
+S:???Maintained
+F:???board/altera/stratix10-socdk/
+F:???include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
+F:???configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0c8024
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier:???GPL-2.0
+#
+
+obj-y????????:= socfpga.o
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +1 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6778c04
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/*
Quoted 8 lines

board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c line 7

Quoted 7 lines
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +6 -0
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:??GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>

Is this even needed or do we still need an empty file ?

As a place holder in case customization needed for socdk. Will document this as avoiding customer change the common code.

Thanks
Chin Liang

Quoted 15 lines

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

#38 lore raw

PATCH v3 9/12 arm: socfpga: stratix10: Add board directory for Stratix 10 socdk

Quoted 71 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 5 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 2 lines · Chin Liang See

Add board folder

directory

Will fix this.

Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 53 lines

for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile    | 7 +++++++
 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c   | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile
 create mode 100644 board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/MAINTAINERS new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..596933c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+SOCFPGA BOARD
+M:   Chin-Liang See <[email protected]>
+M:   Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
+S:   Maintained
+F:   board/altera/stratix10-socdk/
+F:   include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
+F:   configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/Makefile new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0c8024
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier:   GPL-2.0
+#
+
+obj-y        := socfpga.o
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +1 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6778c04
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/*
Quoted 8 lines

board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c line 7

Quoted 7 lines
board/altera/stratix10-socdk/socfpga.c new file +6 -0
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:  GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>

Is this even needed or do we still need an empty file ?

Quoted 3 lines

As a place holder in case customization needed for socdk. Will document this as avoiding customer change the common code.

Customization should go into DT. On the other hand, I am fine with having an empty file here, it's what we do for multiple boards. It would be a bit more core work to clean this up I think.

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#39 lore raw

PATCH v3 10/12 arm: dts: socfpga: Add dts for Stratix 10 socdk

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add device tree for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
Changes for v3
- Changed to correct file mode
- Removed trampoline code
- Fixed the DDR size to 2GB and SDMMC interrupt to 96

---
 arch/arm/dts/Makefile                    |  3 +-
 arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
arch/arm/dts/Makefile +2 -1
index 8458f6b..1809660 100644
@@ -131,7 +131,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA) +=				\
 	socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dtb			\
 	socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dtb			\
 	socfpga_cyclone5_sr1500.dtb			\
-	socfpga_cyclone5_vining_fpga.dtb
+	socfpga_cyclone5_vining_fpga.dtb		\
+	socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dtb
 
 dtb-$(CONFIG_TARGET_DRA7XX_EVM) += dra72-evm.dtb dra7-evm.dtb	\
 	dra72-evm-revc.dtb
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts new file +71 -0

71 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#40 lore raw

PATCH v3 11/12 arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 13 ++++++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +8 -5
index 5038919..2b00c8c 100644
@@ -8,17 +8,20 @@
 #
 
 obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
-
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += mmu-arm64.o
 
+ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
+obj-y += spl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) += freeze_controller.o
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
-obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
-					   fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
+obj-y	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pinmux_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pll_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_sdram_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
+endif
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +12 -1
index fec4c7a..b514a01 100644
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static struct pl310_regs *const pl310 =
 	(struct pl310_regs *)CONFIG_SYS_PL310_BASE;
 static struct scu_registers *scu_regs =
@@ -30,9 +31,11 @@ static struct nic301_registers *nic301_regs =
 	(struct nic301_registers *)SOCFPGA_L3REGS_ADDRESS;
 static struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs =
 	(struct socfpga_system_manager *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS;
+#endif
 
 u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	const u32 bsel = readl(&sysmgr_regs->bootinfo);
 
 	switch (bsel & 0x7) {
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 		printf("Invalid boot device (bsel=%08x)!\n", bsel);
 		hang();
 	}
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
+#endif
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
@@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ u32 spl_boot_mode(const u32 boot_device)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
 {
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->lwhps2fpgaregs);
@@ -77,9 +84,11 @@ static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->ocram);
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->sdrdata);
 }
+#endif
 
 void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 #ifndef CONFIG_SOCFPGA_VIRTUAL_TARGET
 	const struct cm_config *cm_default_cfg = cm_get_default_config();
 #endif
@@ -152,10 +161,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 	debug("Unfreezing/Thaw all I/O banks\n");
 	/* unfreeze / thaw all IO banks */
 	sys_mgr_frzctrl_thaw_req();
-
+#endif
 	/* enable console uart printing */
 	preloader_console_init();
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	if (sdram_mmr_init_full(0xffffffff) != 0) {
 		puts("SDRAM init failed.\n");
 		hang();
@@ -181,4 +191,5 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 
 	/* Configure simple malloc base pointer into RAM. */
 	gd->malloc_base = CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE + (1024 * 1024);
+#endif
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#41 lore raw

PATCH v3 11/12 arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c

Quoted 46 lines · Chin Liang See

Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 13 ++++++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +8 -5
index 5038919..2b00c8c 100644
@@ -8,17 +8,20 @@
 #
 
 obj-y	+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
-
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += mmu-arm64.o
 
+ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
+obj-y += spl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) += freeze_controller.o
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
-obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
-					   fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
+obj-y	+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o	\
 			   wrap_sdram_config.o
 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pinmux_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pll_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_sdram_config.o	+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
+endif
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +0 -0
index fec4c7a..b514a01 100644

It seems like the only thing which happens in the spl.c for S10 is it calls spl_console_init(). In that case, just split the spl into gen5 one and S10 one instead of polluting it with ifdefs.

Quoted 70 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +12 -1
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static struct pl310_regs *const pl310 =
 	(struct pl310_regs *)CONFIG_SYS_PL310_BASE;
 static struct scu_registers *scu_regs =
@@ -30,9 +31,11 @@ static struct nic301_registers *nic301_regs =
 	(struct nic301_registers *)SOCFPGA_L3REGS_ADDRESS;
 static struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs =
 	(struct socfpga_system_manager *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS;
+#endif
 
 u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	const u32 bsel = readl(&sysmgr_regs->bootinfo);
 
 	switch (bsel & 0x7) {
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 		printf("Invalid boot device (bsel=%08x)!\n", bsel);
 		hang();
 	}
+#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10)
+	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
+#endif
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
@@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ u32 spl_boot_mode(const u32 boot_device)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
 {
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->lwhps2fpgaregs);
@@ -77,9 +84,11 @@ static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->ocram);
 	writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->sdrdata);
 }
+#endif
 
 void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 #ifndef CONFIG_SOCFPGA_VIRTUAL_TARGET
 	const struct cm_config *cm_default_cfg = cm_get_default_config();
 #endif
@@ -152,10 +161,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 	debug("Unfreezing/Thaw all I/O banks\n");
 	/* unfreeze / thaw all IO banks */
 	sys_mgr_frzctrl_thaw_req();
-
+#endif
 	/* enable console uart printing */
 	preloader_console_init();
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
 	if (sdram_mmr_init_full(0xffffffff) != 0) {
 		puts("SDRAM init failed.\n");
 		hang();
@@ -181,4 +191,5 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 
 	/* Configure simple malloc base pointer into RAM. */
 	gd->malloc_base = CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE + (1024 * 1024);
+#endif
 }
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#42 lore raw

PATCH v3 11/12 arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC

Quoted 51 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 50 lines · Chin Liang See

Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>

---
?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 13 ++++++++----- ?arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c????| 13 ++++++++++++- ?2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0

socfpga/Makefile
index 5038919..2b00c8c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0
@@ -8,17 +8,20 @@

?#

?obj-y????????+= misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o board.o

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -3
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
-

?obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += mmu-arm64.o

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +6 -0
+ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
+obj-y += spl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) += freeze_controller.o
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5

?# QTS-generated config file wrappers -obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)????+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o \
-????????????????????????????????????????fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
+obj-y????????+= scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o fpga_manager.o system_manager.o
?obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o wrap_pinmux_config.o??\
?????????????????????????wrap_sdram_config.o ?CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o???+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR) ?CFLAGS_wrap_pinmux_config.o??+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR) ?CFLAGS_wrap_pll_config.o?????+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR) ?CFLAGS_wrap_sdram_config.o???+= -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +1 -0
+endif
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +0 -0
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c

Quoted 4 lines

socfpga/spl.c
index fec4c7a..b514a01 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +0 -0

It seems like the only thing which happens in the spl.c for S10 is it calls spl_console_init(). In that case, just split the spl into gen5 one
and S10 one instead of polluting it with ifdefs.

Ok can split this out as already seeing different flow for S10 hardware.

Thanks
Chin Liang

#43 lore raw

PATCH v3 11/12 arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC

Quoted 62 lines · Chin Liang See
Quoted 51 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 50 lines · Chin Liang See

Add SPL support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 13 ++++++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0

socfpga/Makefile
index 5038919..2b00c8c 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +0 -0
@@ -8,17 +8,20 @@
 #
 
 obj-y        += misc.o timer.o reset_manager.o clock_manager.o

board.o

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +6 -4
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += spl.o freeze_controller.o
-
 obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += mmu-arm64.o
 
+ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
+obj-y += spl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) += freeze_controller.o
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 # QTS-generated config file wrappers
-obj-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)    += scan_manager.o

wrap_pll_config.o \
- fpga_manager.o
system_manager.o
+obj-y += scan_manager.o wrap_pll_config.o fpga_manager.o
system_manager.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) += wrap_iocsr_config.o
wrap_pinmux_config.o \
wrap_sdram_config.o

 CFLAGS_wrap_iocsr_config.o   += -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pinmux_config.o  += -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_pll_config.o     += -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
 CFLAGS_wrap_sdram_config.o   += -I$(srctree)/board/$(BOARDDIR)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile +1 -0
+endif
arch/arm/mach- renamed from arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +0 -0
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c

Quoted 4 lines

socfpga/spl.c
index fec4c7a..b514a01 100644

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c +0 -0

It seems like the only thing which happens in the spl.c for S10 is it calls spl_console_init(). In that case, just split the spl into gen5 one
and S10 one instead of polluting it with ifdefs.

Quoted 2 lines

Ok can split this out as already seeing different flow for S10 hardware.

Thanks

Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#44 lore raw

PATCH v3 12/12 arm: socfpga: Add support for Stratix 10 SoC dev kit

In reply to Chin Liang See

Add support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig                          |   4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig             |  10 ++
 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig       |  21 ++++
 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
 create mode 100644 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
arch/arm/Kconfig +3 -1
index 2d3303b..f75010a 100644
@@ -544,13 +544,15 @@ config ARCH_SNAPDRAGON
 
 config ARCH_SOCFPGA
 	bool "Altera SOCFPGA family"
-	select CPU_V7
+	select CPU_V7 if !TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
+	select ARM64 if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
 	select SUPPORT_SPL
 	select OF_CONTROL
 	select SPL_OF_CONTROL
 	select DM
 	select DM_SPI_FLASH
 	select DM_SPI
+	select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
 
 config TARGET_CM_T43
 	bool "Support cm_t43"
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +10 -0
index d91b8bb..12452a9 100644
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ config TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
 config TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 	bool
 
+config TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "Altera SOCFPGA board select"
 	optional
@@ -70,6 +73,10 @@ config TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500
 	bool "SR1500 (Cyclone V)"
 	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
 
+config TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
+	bool "Altera SOCFPGA SoCDK (Stratix 10)"
+	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
+
 config TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO
 	bool "Terasic DE0-Nano-Atlas (Cyclone V)"
 	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
@@ -89,11 +96,13 @@ config SYS_BOARD
 	default "sockit" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
 	default "socrates" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_EBV_SOCRATES
 	default "sr1500" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500
+	default "stratix10-socdk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
 	default "vining_fpga" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SAMTEC_VINING_FPGA
 
 config SYS_VENDOR
 	default "altera" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA5_SOCDK
 	default "altera" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5_SOCDK
+	default "altera" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
 	default "denx" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_DENX_MCVEVK
 	default "ebv" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_EBV_SOCRATES
 	default "samtec" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SAMTEC_VINING_FPGA
@@ -112,6 +121,7 @@ config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
 	default "socfpga_sockit" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
 	default "socfpga_socrates" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_EBV_SOCRATES
 	default "socfpga_sr1500" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500
+	default "socfpga_stratix10_socdk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
 	default "socfpga_vining_fpga" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SAMTEC_VINING_FPGA
 
 endif
configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig new file +21 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b72aa8e
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA=y
+CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10=y
+CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK=y
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="socfpga_stratix10_socdk"
+CONFIG_IDENT_STRING="socfpga_stratix10"
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_IMLS is not set
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_DM_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_FAT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_EXT4=y
+CONFIG_CMD_FS_GENERIC=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_SPL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_DM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_DM_SEQ_ALIAS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT=y
include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h new file +166 -0

166 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.2.2
#45 lore raw

PATCH v3 12/12 arm: socfpga: Add support for Stratix 10 SoC dev kit

Quoted 21 lines · Chin Liang See

Add support for Stratix 10 SoC development kit

Cc Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Cc Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
Cc Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Cc Tien Fong Chee <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig                          |   4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig             |  10 ++
 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig       |  21 ++++
 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig
 create mode 100644 include/configs/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.h
arch/arm/Kconfig +0 -0
index 2d3303b..f75010a 100644

arch/arm/Kconfig config ARCH_SNAPDRAGON · line 547

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/Kconfig +1 -1
@@ -544,13 +544,15 @@ config ARCH_SNAPDRAGON
 
 config ARCH_SOCFPGA
 	bool "Altera SOCFPGA family"
-	select CPU_V7
+	select CPU_V7 if !TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10

This will fail when stratix86 comes out. You should use select CPU_V7 if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 . And this will need adjustment for A10.

arch/arm/Kconfig config ARCH_SNAPDRAGON · line 555

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/Kconfig +2 -0
+	select ARM64 if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
 	select SUPPORT_SPL
 	select OF_CONTROL
 	select SPL_OF_CONTROL
 	select DM
 	select DM_SPI_FLASH
 	select DM_SPI
+	select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10

Why do you need this ?

Quoted 17 lines
arch/arm/Kconfig +0 -0
 config TARGET_CM_T43
 	bool "Support cm_t43"
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +3 -0
index d91b8bb..12452a9 100644
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ config TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
 config TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
 	bool
 
+config TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "Altera SOCFPGA board select"
 	optional

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig config TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500 · line 78

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -70,6 +73,10 @@ config TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500
 	bool "SR1500 (Cyclone V)"
 	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
 
+config TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
+	bool "Altera SOCFPGA SoCDK (Stratix 10)"
+	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10

Is what you are adding really a SoCDK or SoCVT ?

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +1 -0
 config TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO
 	bool "Terasic DE0-Nano-Atlas (Cyclone V)"
 	select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
@@ -89,11 +96,13 @@ config SYS_BOARD
 	default "sockit" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
 	default "socrates" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_EBV_SOCRATES
 	default "sr1500" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SR1500
+	default "stratix10-socdk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10_SOCDK
 	default "vining_fpga" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_SAMTEC_VINING_FPGA

[...]

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +5 -0
+/*
+ * U-Boot environment configurations
+ */
+#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE		1
+#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE			0x1000

Since you support MMC, place the env into MMC .

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +6 -0
+/*
+ * Boot arguments passed to the boot command. The value of
+ * CONFIG_BOOTARGS goes into the environment value "bootargs".
+ * Do note the value will overide also the chosen node in FDT blob.
+ */
+#define CONFIG_BOOTARGS "rdinit=/sbin/init mem=2048M"

I believe these whole bootargs are bogus, the mem= shouldn't be needed unless there is a problem with passing this information from u-boot. And the rdinit is just default value.

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +2 -0
+#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \
+	"verify=n\0" \

Is this verify=n needed?

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +3 -0
+	"loadaddr=" __stringify(CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR) "\0" \
+	"bootimage=Image\0" \
+	"fdt_addr=100\0" \

You should load the FDT onto some more sensible address, not right below the kernel. Something like loading kernel to +64MB from start of RAM and fdt to +96M might make sense.

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +5 -0
+	"fdtimage=socfpga_stratix10_swvp.dtb\0" \
+	"mmcroot=/dev/mmcblk0p2\0" \
+	"mmcboot=setenv bootargs " CONFIG_BOOTARGS \
+		" root=${mmcroot} rw rootwait;" \
+		"booti ${loadaddr} - ${fdt_addr}\0" \

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +10 -0
+	"mmcload=mmc rescan;" \
+		"load mmc 0:1 ${loadaddr} ${bootimage};" \
+		"load mmc 0:1 ${fdt_addr} ${fdtimage}\0" \
+
+/*
+ * Generic Interrupt Controller Definitions
+ */
+#define CONFIG_GICV2
+#define GICD_BASE			0xFFFC1000
+#define GICC_BASE			0xFFFC2000

This should be in the base address file, no ?

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +9 -0
+/*
+ * External memory configurations
+ */
+#define PHYS_SDRAM_1			0x0
+#define PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE		0x80000000
+#define CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE		0
+#define CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS		1
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START	0
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END		0x100000

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +10 -0
+
+/*
+ * Serial / UART configurations
+ */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_SERIAL
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE	-4
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1		SOCFPGA_UART0_ADDRESS
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_CLK		1000000
+#define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX		1
+#define CONFIG_BAUDRATE			115200

I _think_ you can pull those from DT nowadays.

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +7 -0
+/*
+ * Timer & watchdog configurations
+ */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_TIMERBASE		SOCFPGA_SYSTIMER0_ADDRESS
+#define TIMER_LOAD_VAL			0xFFFFFFFF
+
+/*

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +10 -0
+ * SDMMC configurations
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_MMC
+#define CONFIG_MMC
+#define CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER
+#define CONFIG_GENERIC_MMC
+#define CONFIG_DWMMC
+#define CONFIG_SOCFPGA_DWMMC
+#define CONFIG_SOCFPGA_DWMMC_FIFO_DEPTH		1024
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MMC_MAX_BLK_COUNT		256

Isn't this defined in the socfpga_common.h already ?

Quoted 45 lines
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +44 -0
+#endif
+/*
+ * Flash configurations
+ */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	1
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
+
+
+/*
+ * SPL memory layout
+ *
+ * On chip RAM
+ * 0xFFE0_0000 ...... Start of OCRAM
+ * SPL code, rwdata
+ * 0xFFEx_xxxx ...... Top of stack (grows down)
+ * 0xFFEy_yyyy ...... Global Data
+ * 0xFFEz_zzzz ...... Malloc prior relocation (size CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN)
+ * 0xFFE3_FFFF ...... End of OCRAM
+ *
+ * SDRAM
+ * 0x0000_0000 ...... Start of SDRAM_1
+ * unused / empty space for image loading
+ * Size 64MB   ...... MALLOC (size CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE)
+ * Size 1MB    ...... BSS (size CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE)
+ * 0x8000_0000 ...... End of SDRAM_1 (assume 2GB)
+ *
+ */
+#define CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK
+#define CONFIG_SPL_RAM_DEVICE
+#define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE		CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR
+#define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE		CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE
+#define CONFIG_SPL_STACK		CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR
+#define CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE		0x100000	/* 1 MB */
+#define CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR	(PHYS_SDRAM_1 + PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE \
+					- CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE)
+#define CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE	(CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN)
+#define CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START	(CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR \
+					- CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE)
+
+/* SPL SDMMC boot support */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_FS_BOOT_PARTITION	1
+#define CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME		"u-boot-dtb.img"
+
+#endif	/* __CONFIG_H */
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut