Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks calculations" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Oct 28, 2016

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks calculations

to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-gen9-fix-plane_blocks_per_line-on-watermarks-calculations.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From cf6c525a31fac11b0775b8c06c00a508c6356d9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:00:32 -0300
Subject: drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks calculations

From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>

commit cf6c525a31fac11b0775b8c06c00a508c6356d9b upstream.

The confusing thing is that plane_blocks_per_line is listed as part of the method 2 calculation but is also used for other things. We calculated it in two different places and different ways: one inside skl_wm_method2() and the other inside skl_compute_plane_wm(). The skl_wm_method2() implementation is the one that matches the specification.

With this patch we fix the skl_compute_plane_wm() calculation and just pass it as a parameter to skl_wm_method2(). We also take care to not modify the value of plane_bytes_per_line since we're going to rely on it having a correct value in later patches.

This should affect the watermarks for Linear and Y-tiled.

Quoted 1 line

From my analysis, it looks like the two plane_blocks_per_line

variables got out of sync on 0fda65680e92, but we can't really say that commit was a regression, it looks like just an incomplete fix. There's always the possibility that 0fda65680e92 matched our specification at that time, and then later the specification changed.

v2: Try to add a "Fixes" tag (Maarten).

Fixes 0fda65680e92 ("drm/i915/skl: Update watermarks for Y tiling")
Cc Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7a1a8aed67e0a60772defe3f6499eb340da48634)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +15 -24
@@ -3475,30 +3475,14 @@ static uint32_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t
 }
 
 static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint32_t pipe_htotal,
-			       uint32_t horiz_pixels, uint8_t cpp,
-			       uint64_t tiling, uint32_t latency,
-			       uint32_t y_min_scanlines)
+			       uint32_t latency, uint32_t plane_blocks_per_line)
 {
 	uint32_t ret;
-	uint32_t plane_bytes_per_line, plane_blocks_per_line;
 	uint32_t wm_intermediate_val;
 
 	if (latency == 0)
 		return UINT_MAX;
 
-	plane_bytes_per_line = horiz_pixels * cpp;
-
-	if (tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
-	    tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
-		plane_bytes_per_line *= y_min_scanlines;
-		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
-		plane_blocks_per_line /= y_min_scanlines;
-	} else if (tiling == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
-		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512) + 1;
-	} else {
-		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
-	}
-
 	wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate;
 	ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, pipe_htotal * 1000) *
 				plane_blocks_per_line;
@@ -3587,17 +3571,24 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const st
 		y_min_scanlines = 4;
 	}
 
+	plane_bytes_per_line = width * cpp;
+	if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
+	    fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+		plane_blocks_per_line =
+		      DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line * y_min_scanlines, 512);
+		plane_blocks_per_line /= y_min_scanlines;
+	} else if (fb->modifier[0] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
+		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512)
+					+ 1;
+	} else {
+		plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+	}
+
 	method1 = skl_wm_method1(plane_pixel_rate, cpp, latency);
 	method2 = skl_wm_method2(plane_pixel_rate,
 				 cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
-				 width,
-				 cpp,
-				 fb->modifier[0],
 				 latency,
-				 y_min_scanlines);
-
-	plane_bytes_per_line = width * cpp;
-	plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+				 plane_blocks_per_line);
 
 	if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
 	    fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-the-watermark-res_blocks-value.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-only-add-the-planes-actually-affected-by-ddb-changes.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-the-wawmmemoryreadlatency-implementation.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-introduce-intel_has_sagv.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-fix-plane_blocks_per_line-on-watermarks-calculations.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-kbl-kbl-also-needs-to-run-the-sagv-code.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-gen9-minimum-scanlines-for-y-tile-is-not-always-4.patch queue-4.8/drm-i915-sagv-is-not-skl-only-so-rename-a-few-things.patch