Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations

PATCH Superseded Tim Chen 2 participants 13 messages Nov 15, 2016 – Jan 5, 2017

Subsystems (2)

v3 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Tim Chen

author
#0 lore raw

v3 cover mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations

Andrew,

It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.

We appreciate feedback about this patch series from the community. Historically, neither the performance nor latency of the swap path mattered. The underlying I/O was slow enough to hide any latency coming from software and the low IOPS kept the overall CPU impact low.

Times have changed. Coming generation of Solid state Block device latencies are getting down to sub 100 usec, which is within an order of magnitude of DRAM, and their performance is orders of magnitude higher than the single- spindle rotational media we've swapped to historically.

This could benefit many usage scenearios. For example cloud providers who overcommit their memory (as VM don't use all the memory provisioned). Having a fast swap will allow them to be more aggressive in memory overcommit and fit more VMs to a platform.

In our testing [see footnote], the median latency that the kernel adds to a page fault is 15 usec, which comes quite close to the amount that will be contributed by the underlying I/O devices.

The software latency comes mostly from contentions on the locks protecting the radix tree of the swap cache and also the locks protecting the individual swap devices. The lock contentions already consumed 35% of cpu cycles in our test. In the very near future, software latency will become the bottleneck to swap performnace as block device I/O latency gets within the shouting distance of DRAM speed.

This patch set, plus a previous patch Ying already posted (commit: f6498b3f) reduced the median page fault latency from 15 usec to 4 usec (375% reduction) for DRAM based pmem block device.

Patch 1 is a clean up patch.
Patch 2 creates a lock per cluster, this gives us a more fine graind lock
that can be used for accessing swap_map, and not lock the whole swap device
Patch 3 splits the swap cache radix tree into 64MB chunks, reducing
the rate that we have to contende for the radix tree.
Patch 4 eliminates unnecessary page allocation for read ahead. Patch 5-8 create a per cpu cache of the swap slots, so we don't have
to contend on the swap device to get a swap slot or to release a swap slot. And we allocate and release the swap slots in batches for better efficiency.

Ying Huang & Tim Chen

Footnote:
We tested mmotm-2016-10-11-15-46 kernel with/without optimizations from this patche series plus one additional patch Ying posted earlier on removing radix tree write back tag in swap cache. Eight threads performed random memory access on a 2 socket Haswell using swap mounted on RAM based PMEM block device. This emulated a moderate load and a SWAP device unbounded by I/O speed. The aggregate working set is twice the RAM size. We instrumented the kernel to measure the page fault latency.

Change Log:
v3:
1. Fix bug that didn't check for page already in swap cache before skipping read ahead and return null page.
2. Fix bug that didn't try to allocate from global pool if allocation from swap slot cache did not succeed.
3. Fix memory allocation bug for spaces to store split up 64MB radix tree
4. Fix problems caused by races between get_swap_page, cpu online/offline and swap_on/off

v2:
1. Fix bug in the index limit used in scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster when searching for empty slots in cluster.
2. Fix bug in swap off that incorrectly determines if we still have swap devices left.
3. Port patches to mmotm-2016-10-11-15-46 branch

Huang, Ying (3):
mm/swap: Fix kernel message in swap_info_get()
mm/swap: Add cluster lock
mm/swap: Split swap cache into 64MB trunks

Tim Chen (5):
mm/swap: skip read ahead for unreferenced swap slots mm/swap: Allocate swap slots in batches mm/swap: Free swap slots in batch
mm/swap: Add cache for swap slots allocation mm/swap: Enable swap slots cache usage

 include/linux/swap.h       |  36 ++-
 include/linux/swap_slots.h |  28 +++
 mm/Makefile                |   2 +-
 mm/swap.c                  |   6 -
 mm/swap_slots.c            | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/swap_state.c            |  74 ++++++-
 mm/swapfile.c              | 542 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 7 files changed, 911 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/swap_slots.h
 create mode 100644 mm/swap_slots.c
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/8 mm/swap: Fix kernel message in swap_info_get()

From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>

swap_info_get() is used not only in swap free code path but also in page_swapcount(), etc. So the original kernel message in swap_info_get() is not correct now. Fix it via replacing "swap_free" to "swap_info_get" in the message.

---
 mm/swapfile.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
mm/swapfile.c +4 -4
index 2210de2..b745d3d 100644
@@ -753,16 +753,16 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info_get(swp_entry_t entry)
 	return p;
 
 bad_free:
-	pr_err("swap_free: %s%08lx\n", Unused_offset, entry.val);
+	pr_err("swap_info_get: %s%08lx\n", Unused_offset, entry.val);
 	goto out;
 bad_offset:
-	pr_err("swap_free: %s%08lx\n", Bad_offset, entry.val);
+	pr_err("swap_info_get: %s%08lx\n", Bad_offset, entry.val);
 	goto out;
 bad_device:
-	pr_err("swap_free: %s%08lx\n", Unused_file, entry.val);
+	pr_err("swap_info_get: %s%08lx\n", Unused_file, entry.val);
 	goto out;
 bad_nofile:
-	pr_err("swap_free: %s%08lx\n", Bad_file, entry.val);
+	pr_err("swap_info_get: %s%08lx\n", Bad_file, entry.val);
 out:
 	return NULL;
 }
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/8 mm/swap: Add cluster lock

In reply to Tim Chen

From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>

This patch is to reduce the lock contention of swap_info_struct->lock via using a more fine grained lock in swap_cluster_info for some swap operations. swap_info_struct->lock is heavily contended if multiple processes reclaim pages simultaneously. Because there is only one lock for each swap device. While in common configuration, there is only one or several swap devices in the system. The lock protects almost all swap related operations.

In fact, many swap operations only access one element of swap_info_struct->swap_map array. And there is no dependency between different elements of swap_info_struct->swap_map. So a fine grained lock can be used to allow parallel access to the different elements of swap_info_struct->swap_map.

In this patch, one bit of swap_cluster_info is used as the bin spinlock to protect the elements of swap_info_struct->swap_map in the swap cluster and the fields of swap_cluster_info. This reduced locking contention for swap_info_struct->swap_map access greatly.

To use the bin spinlock, the size of swap_cluster_info needs to increase from 4 bytes to 8 bytes on the 64bit system. This will use 4k more memory for every 1G swap space.

Because the size of swap_cluster_info is much smaller than the size of the cache line (8 vs 64 on x86_64 architecture), there may be false cache line sharing between swap_cluster_info bit spinlocks. To avoid the false sharing in the first round of the swap cluster allocation, the order of the swap clusters in the free clusters list is changed. So that, the swap_cluster_info sharing the same cache line will be placed as far as possible. After the first round of allocation, the order of the clusters in free clusters list is expected to be random. So the false sharing should be not noticeable.

---
 include/linux/swap.h |  13 ++-
 mm/swapfile.c        | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +9 -4
index 7e553e1..2e0c9ae 100644
@@ -175,11 +175,16 @@ enum {
  * protected by swap_info_struct.lock.
  */
 struct swap_cluster_info {
-	unsigned int data:24;
-	unsigned int flags:8;
+	unsigned long data;
 };
-#define CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE 1 /* This cluster is free */
-#define CLUSTER_FLAG_NEXT_NULL 2 /* This cluster has no next cluster */
+#define CLUSTER_COUNT_SHIFT		8
+#define CLUSTER_FLAG_MASK		((1UL << CLUSTER_COUNT_SHIFT) - 1)
+#define CLUSTER_COUNT_MASK		(~CLUSTER_FLAG_MASK)
+#define CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE		1 /* This cluster is free */
+#define CLUSTER_FLAG_NEXT_NULL		2 /* This cluster has no next cluster */
+/* cluster lock, protect cluster_info contents and sis->swap_map */
+#define CLUSTER_FLAG_LOCK_BIT		2
+#define CLUSTER_FLAG_LOCK		(1 << CLUSTER_FLAG_LOCK_BIT)
 
 /*
  * We assign a cluster to each CPU, so each CPU can allocate swap entry from
mm/swapfile.c +185 -54

524 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#3 lore raw

PATCH v3 3/8 mm/swap: Split swap cache into 64MB trunks

In reply to Tim Chen

From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>

The patch is to improve the scalability of the swap out/in via using fine grained locks for the swap cache. In current kernel, one address space will be used for each swap device. And in the common configuration, the number of the swap device is very small (one is typical). This causes the heavy lock contention on the radix tree of the address space if multiple tasks swap out/in concurrently. But in fact, there is no dependency between pages in the swap cache. So that, we can split the one shared address space for each swap device into several address spaces to reduce the lock contention. In the patch, the shared address space is split into 64MB trunks. 64MB is chosen to balance the memory space usage and effect of lock contention reduction.

The size of struct address_space on x86_64 architecture is 408B, so with the patch, 6528B more memory will be used for every 1GB swap space on x86_64 architecture.

One address space is still shared for the swap entries in the same 64M trunks. To avoid lock contention for the first round of swap space allocation, the order of the swap clusters in the initial free clusters list is changed. The swap space distance between the consecutive swap clusters in the free cluster list is at least 64M. After the first round of allocation, the swap clusters are expected to be freed randomly, so the lock contention should be reduced effectively.

---
 include/linux/swap.h | 10 ++++++--
 mm/swap.c            |  6 -----
 mm/swap_state.c      | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 mm/swapfile.c        | 16 ++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +8 -2
index 2e0c9ae..6bda950 100644
@@ -370,8 +370,12 @@ int generic_swapfile_activate(struct swap_info_struct *, struct file *,
 		sector_t *);
 
 /* linux/mm/swap_state.c */
-extern struct address_space swapper_spaces[];
-#define swap_address_space(entry) (&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)])
+/* One swap address space for each 64M swap space */
+#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT	14
+#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES	(1 << SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
+extern struct address_space* swapper_spaces[];
+#define swap_address_space(entry)					\
+	(&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)][swp_offset(entry) >> SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT])
 extern unsigned long total_swapcache_pages(void);
 extern void show_swap_cache_info(void);
 extern int add_to_swap(struct page *, struct list_head *list);
@@ -425,6 +429,8 @@ extern struct swap_info_struct *page_swap_info(struct page *);
 extern bool reuse_swap_page(struct page *, int *);
 extern int try_to_free_swap(struct page *);
 struct backing_dev_info;
+extern int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
+extern void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
 
mm/swap.c +0 -6
index 4dcf852..5c2ea71 100644
@@ -969,12 +969,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag);
 void __init swap_setup(void)
 {
 	unsigned long megs = totalram_pages >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++)
-		spin_lock_init(&swapper_spaces[i].tree_lock);
-#endif
 
 	/* Use a smaller cluster for small-memory machines */
 	if (megs < 16)
mm/swap_state.c +57 -12

92 lines not on this page · raw message

mm/swapfile.c +14 -2
index 3806bce..4f1b721 100644
@@ -2076,6 +2076,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
 	vfree(frontswap_map);
 	/* Destroy swap account information */
 	swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
+	exit_swap_address_space(p->type);
 
 	inode = mapping->host;
 	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
@@ -2397,8 +2398,12 @@ static unsigned long read_swap_header(struct swap_info_struct *p,
 	return maxpages;
 }
 
-#define SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS						\
+#define SWAP_CLUSTER_INFO_COLS						\
 	DIV_ROUND_UP(L1_CACHE_BYTES, sizeof(struct swap_cluster_info))
+#define SWAP_CLUSTER_SPACE_COLS						\
+	DIV_ROUND_UP(SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER)
+#define SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS						\
+	max_t(unsigned int, SWAP_CLUSTER_INFO_COLS, SWAP_CLUSTER_SPACE_COLS)
 
 static int setup_swap_map_and_extents(struct swap_info_struct *p,
 					union swap_header *swap_header,
@@ -2461,7 +2466,10 @@ static int setup_swap_map_and_extents(struct swap_info_struct *p,
 		return nr_extents;
 
 
-	/* Reduce false cache line sharing between cluster_info */
+	/*
+	 * Reduce false cache line sharing between cluster_info and
+	 * sharing same address space.
+	 */
 	for (k = 0; k < SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS; k++) {
 		j = (k + col) % SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS;
 		for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_clusters, SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS); i++) {
@@ -2642,6 +2650,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
 		}
 	}
 
+	error = init_swap_address_space(p->type, maxpages);
+	if (error)
+		goto bad_swap;
+
 	mutex_lock(&swapon_mutex);
 	prio = -1;
 	if (swap_flags & SWAP_FLAG_PREFER)
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#4 lore raw

PATCH v3 4/8 mm/swap: skip read ahead for unreferenced swap slots

In reply to Tim Chen

We can avoid needlessly allocating page for swap slots that are not used by anyone. No pages have to be read in for these slots.

---
 include/linux/swap.h |  6 ++++++
 mm/swap_state.c      |  4 ++++
 mm/swapfile.c        | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +6 -0
index 6bda950..13bbc5f 100644
@@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ extern unsigned int count_swap_pages(int, int);
 extern sector_t map_swap_page(struct page *, struct block_device **);
 extern sector_t swapdev_block(int, pgoff_t);
 extern int page_swapcount(struct page *);
+extern int __swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry);
 extern int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry);
 extern struct swap_info_struct *page_swap_info(struct page *);
 extern bool reuse_swap_page(struct page *, int *);
@@ -518,6 +519,11 @@ static inline int page_swapcount(struct page *page)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int __swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry)
 {
 	return 0;
mm/swap_state.c +4 -0
index 9df26c9..c761104 100644
@@ -323,6 +323,10 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		if (found_page)
 			break;
 
+		/* Just skip read ahead for unused swap slot */
+		if (!__swp_swapcount(entry))
+			return NULL;
+
 		/*
 		 * Get a new page to read into from swap.
 		 */
mm/swapfile.c +41 -6

73 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#5 lore raw

PATCH v3 5/8 mm/swap: Allocate swap slots in batches

In reply to Tim Chen

Currently, the swap slots are allocated one page at a time, causing contention to the swap_info lock protecting the swap partition on every page being swapped.

This patch adds new functions get_swap_pages and scan_swap_map_slots to request multiple swap slots at once. This will reduces the lock contention on the swap_info lock. Also scan_swap_map_slots can operate more efficiently as swap slots often occurs in clusters close to each other on a swap device and it is quicker to allocate them together.

---
 include/linux/swap.h |   2 +
 mm/swapfile.c        | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +2 -0
index 13bbc5f..d2b69bd 100644
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct bio;
 #define SWAP_FLAGS_VALID	(SWAP_FLAG_PRIO_MASK | SWAP_FLAG_PREFER | \
 				 SWAP_FLAG_DISCARD | SWAP_FLAG_DISCARD_ONCE | \
 				 SWAP_FLAG_DISCARD_PAGES)
+#define SWAP_BATCH 64
 
 static inline int current_is_kswapd(void)
 {
@@ -412,6 +413,7 @@ static inline long get_nr_swap_pages(void)
 extern void si_swapinfo(struct sysinfo *);
 extern swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void);
 extern swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int);
+extern int get_swap_pages(int n, swp_entry_t swp_entries[]);
 extern int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
 extern void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
mm/swapfile.c +113 -25

222 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#6 lore raw

PATCH v3 6/8 mm/swap: Free swap slots in batch

In reply to Tim Chen

Add new functions that free unused swap slots in batches without the need to reacquire swap info lock. This improves scalability and reduce lock contention.

---
 include/linux/swap.h |   1 +
 mm/swapfile.c        | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +1 -0
index d2b69bd..7492fcc 100644
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swapcache_prepare(swp_entry_t);
 extern void swap_free(swp_entry_t);
 extern void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t);
+extern void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n);
 extern int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t);
 extern int swap_type_of(dev_t, sector_t, struct block_device **);
 extern unsigned int count_swap_pages(int, int);
mm/swapfile.c +94 -61

212 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#7 lore raw

PATCH v3 7/8 mm/swap: Add cache for swap slots allocation

In reply to Tim Chen

We add per cpu caches for swap slots that can be allocated and freed quickly without the need to touch the swap info lock.

Two separate caches are maintained for swap slots allocated and swap slots returned. This is to allow the swap slots to be returned to the global pool in a batch so they will have a chance to be coaelesced with other slots in a cluster. We do not reuse the slots that are returned right away, as it may increase fragmentation of the slots.

The swap allocation cache is protected by a mutex as we may sleep when searching for empty slots in cache. The swap free cache is protected by a spin lock as we cannot sleep in the free path.

We refill the swap slots cache when we run out of slots, and we disable the swap slots cache and drain the slots if the global number of slots fall below a low watermark threshold. We re-enable the cache agian when the slots available are above a high watermark.

---
 include/linux/swap.h       |   4 +
 include/linux/swap_slots.h |  28 ++++
 mm/Makefile                |   2 +-
 mm/swap_slots.c            | 364 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/swap_state.c            |   1 +
 mm/swapfile.c              |  26 ++--
 6 files changed, 413 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/swap_slots.h
 create mode 100644 mm/swap_slots.c
include/linux/swap.h +4 -0
index 7492fcc..6ae235a 100644
@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ extern struct page *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t, gfp_t,
 /* linux/mm/swapfile.c */
 extern atomic_long_t nr_swap_pages;
 extern long total_swap_pages;
+extern bool has_usable_swap(void);
 
 /* Swap 50% full? Release swapcache more aggressively.. */
 static inline bool vm_swap_full(void)
@@ -436,6 +437,9 @@ struct backing_dev_info;
 extern int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
 extern void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type);
 
+extern int get_swap_slots(int n, swp_entry_t *slots);
+extern void swapcache_free_batch(swp_entry_t *entries, int n);
+
 #else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
 
 #define swap_address_space(entry)		(NULL)
include/linux/swap_slots.h new file +28 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a59e6e2
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_SWAP_SLOTS_H
+#define _LINUX_SWAP_SLOTS_H
+
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+
+#define SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE			SWAP_BATCH
+#define THRESHOLD_ACTIVATE_SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE	(5*SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE)
+#define THRESHOLD_DEACTIVATE_SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE	(2*SWAP_SLOTS_CACHE_SIZE)
+
+struct swap_slots_cache {
+	bool		lock_initialized;
+	struct mutex	alloc_lock;
+	swp_entry_t	*slots;
+	int		nr;
+	int		cur;
+	spinlock_t	free_lock;
+	swp_entry_t	*slots_ret;
+	int		n_ret;
+};
+
+void disable_swap_slots_cache_lock(void);
+void reenable_swap_slots_cache_unlock(void);
+int enable_swap_slots_cache(void);
+int free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry);
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_SWAP_SLOTS_H */
mm/Makefile +1 -1
index 2ca1faf..9d51267 100644
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ obj-y			:= filemap.o mempool.o oom_kill.o \
 			   readahead.o swap.o truncate.o vmscan.o shmem.o \
 			   util.o mmzone.o vmstat.o backing-dev.o \
 			   mm_init.o mmu_context.o percpu.o slab_common.o \
-			   compaction.o vmacache.o \
+			   compaction.o vmacache.o swap_slots.o \
 			   interval_tree.o list_lru.o workingset.o \
 			   debug.o $(mmu-y)
 
mm/swap_slots.c new file +364 -0

364 lines not on this page · raw message

mm/swap_state.c +1 -0
index c761104..785df7f 100644
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/pagevec.h>
 #include <linux/migrate.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/swap_slots.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 
mm/swapfile.c +15 -11
index f135680..0bd105d 100644
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/frontswap.h>
 #include <linux/swapfile.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/swap_slots.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -861,14 +862,6 @@ noswap:
 	return n_ret;
 }
 
-swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void)
-{
-	swp_entry_t entry;
-
-	get_swap_pages(1, &entry);
-	return entry;
-}
-
 /* The only caller of this function is now suspend routine */
 swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int type)
 {
@@ -1059,7 +1052,7 @@ void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
 	p = _swap_info_get(entry);
 	if (p) {
 		if (!__swap_entry_free(p, entry, 1))
-			swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
+			free_swap_slot(entry);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1073,7 +1066,7 @@ void swapcache_free(swp_entry_t entry)
 	p = _swap_info_get(entry);
 	if (p) {
 		if (!__swap_entry_free(p, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE))
-			swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
+			free_swap_slot(entry);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1281,7 +1274,7 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
 				page = NULL;
 			}
 		} else if (!count)
-			swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
+			free_swap_slot(entry);
 	}
 	if (page) {
 		/*
@@ -2110,6 +2103,17 @@ static void reinsert_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p)
 	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 }
 
+bool has_usable_swap(void)
+{
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+	if (plist_head_empty(&swap_active_head))
+		ret = false;
+	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
 {
 	struct swap_info_struct *p = NULL;
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#8 lore raw

PATCH v3 8/8 mm/swap: Enable swap slots cache usage

In reply to Tim Chen

Initialize swap slots cache and enable it on swap on. Drain all swap slots on swap off.

---
 mm/swapfile.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
mm/swapfile.c +7 -0
index 0bd105d..9cbdbfc 100644
@@ -2184,6 +2184,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
 	spin_unlock(&p->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 
+	disable_swap_slots_cache_lock();
+
 	set_current_oom_origin();
 	err = try_to_unuse(p->type, false, 0); /* force unuse all pages */
 	clear_current_oom_origin();
@@ -2191,9 +2193,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
 	if (err) {
 		/* re-insert swap space back into swap_list */
 		reinsert_swap_info(p);
+		reenable_swap_slots_cache_unlock();
 		goto out_dput;
 	}
 
+	reenable_swap_slots_cache_unlock();
+
 	flush_work(&p->discard_work);
 
 	destroy_swap_extents(p);
@@ -2869,6 +2874,8 @@ out:
 		putname(name);
 	if (inode && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
 		inode_unlock(inode);
+	if (!error)
+		enable_swap_slots_cache();
 	return error;
 }
 
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#9 lore raw
In reply to Tim Chen
Quoted 6 lines · Tim Chen

Andrew,

It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in moreA depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.

Hi Andrew,

Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?

Thanks.

Ying & Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

maintainer
#10 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 6 lines · Tim Chen

Andrew,

It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.

Quoted 4 lines

Hi Andrew,

Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?

Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree. So I have them buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

author
#11 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Tim Chen

Andrew,

It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Hi Andrew,

Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?

Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.A A So I have them buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.

Thanks. A That will be great if the patchset can go into 4.10-rc1.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

author
#12 lore raw
In reply to Andrew Morton
Quoted 12 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Tim Chen

Andrew,

It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Hi Andrew,

Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?

Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.A A So I have them buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.

Andrew,

We've updated the patchset to v4. A

Is there anything we need to modify for the patch set to beA picked up for mm tree?

Thanks.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>