FAILED: patch "[PATCH] exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
f84df2a6f268de584a201e8911384a2d244876e3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:06:51 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files
When the user namespace support was merged the need to prevent ptrace from revealing the contents of an unreadable executable was overlooked.
Correct this oversight by ensuring that the executed file or files are in mm->user_ns, by adjusting mm->user_ns.
Use the new function privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid to see if the executable is a member of the user namespace, and as such if having CAP_SYS_PTRACE in the user namespace should allow tracing the executable. If not update mm->user_ns to the parent user namespace until an appropriate parent is found.
fs/exec.c +17 -2
@@ -1275,8 +1275,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flush_old_exec);void would_dump (struct linux_binprm *bprm,struct file *file) { -if (inode_permission (file_inode (file),MAY_READ ) <0 ) +struct inode *inode =file_inode (file); +if (inode_permission (inode,MAY_READ ) <0 ) { +struct user_namespace *old, *user_ns; bprm->interp_flags |=BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP ; + +/* Ensure mm->user_ns contains the executable */ + user_ns = old = bprm->mm->user_ns; +while ((user_ns != &init_user_ns) && + !privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid (user_ns, inode)) + user_ns = user_ns->parent; + +if (old != user_ns) { + bprm->mm->user_ns =get_user_ns (user_ns); +put_user_ns (old); + } + } }EXPORT_SYMBOL (would_dump);
@@ -1306,7 +1320,6 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) !gid_eq(bprm->cred->gid, current_egid())) { current->pdeath_signal = 0; } else { -would_dump (bprm, bprm->file);if (bprm->interp_flags &BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP )set_dumpable (current->mm, suid_dumpable); }
@@ -1741,6 +1754,8 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, struct filename *filename,if (retval <0 ) goto out; +would_dump (bprm, bprm->file); + retval =exec_binprm (bprm);if (retval <0 ) goto out;
include/linux/capability.h +1 -0
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) return true; }#endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */ +extern bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid (struct user_namespace *ns,const struct inode *inode);extern bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid (const struct inode *inode,int cap);extern bool file_ns_capable (const struct file *file,struct user_namespace *ns,int cap);extern bool ptracer_capable (struct task_struct *tsk,struct user_namespace *ns);
kernel/capability.c +14 -2
@@ -457,6 +457,19 @@ bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace *ns,EXPORT_SYMBOL (file_ns_capable);/** +* privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid - Do capabilities in the namespace work over the inode? +* @ns: The user namespace in question +* @inode: The inode in question +* +* Return true if the inode uid and gid are within the namespace. +*/ +bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid (struct user_namespace *ns,const struct inode *inode) +{ +return kuid_has_mapping (ns, inode->i_uid) && +kgid_has_mapping (ns, inode->i_gid); +} + +/** * capable_wrt_inode_uidgid - Check nsown_capable and uid and gid mapped * @inode: The inode in question * @cap: The capability in question
@@ -469,8 +482,7 @@ bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap) {struct user_namespace *ns =current_user_ns (); -return ns_capable (ns, cap) &&kuid_has_mapping (ns, inode->i_uid) && -kgid_has_mapping (ns, inode->i_gid); +return ns_capable (ns, cap) &&privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid (ns, inode); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (capable_wrt_inode_uidgid);