] layerindex: Update tinfoil to call shutdown method
PATCH 1/1 ] layerindex: Update tinfoil to call shutdown method
The new client/server API of tinfoil requires explicit call of shutdown method to send the event for finalize cooker process.
Also in update_layer remove the databuilder and cache instance now isn't needed.
--- layerindex/bulkchange.py | 1 + layerindex/recipedesc.py | 2 ++ layerindex/recipeparse.py | 6 ------ layerindex/tools/import_classic.py | 1 + layerindex/update_layer.py | 1 + 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
layerindex/bulkchange.py +1 -0
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ def main(): outp = generate_patches(tinfoil, fetchdir, changeset, sys.argv[2]) finally: + tinfoil.shutdown() utils.unlock_file(lockfile) if outp:
layerindex/recipedesc.py +2 -0
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ def main(): except Exception as e: logger.info("Unable to read %s: %s", fullpath, str(e)) + tinfoil.shutdown() + sys.exit(0)
layerindex/recipeparse.py +0 -6
@@ -34,12 +34,6 @@ def _setup_tinfoil(bitbakepath, enable_tracking): tinfoil.cooker.enableDataTracking() tinfoil.prepare(config_only = True) - # XXX: Setup databuilder - tinfoil.databuilder = bb.cookerdata.CookerDataBuilder(tinfoil.config) - tinfoil.databuilder.parseBaseConfiguration() - - tinfoil.cache = bb.cache.NoCache(tinfoil.databuilder) - return tinfoil def _parse_layer_conf(layerdir, data):
layerindex/tools/import_classic.py +1 -0
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ def main(): transaction.rollback() finally: transaction.leave_transaction_management() + tinfoil.shutdown() shutil.rmtree(tempdir) sys.exit(0)
layerindex/update_layer.py +1 -0
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ def main(): import traceback traceback.print_exc() + tinfoil.shutdown() shutil.rmtree(tempdir) sys.exit(0)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
Hi Aníbal,
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:21:36 Aníbal Limón wrote:
The new client/server API of tinfoil requires explicit call of shutdown method to send the event for finalize cooker process.
Also in
update_layerremove the databuilder and cache instance now isn't needed.
This patch didn't apply against master - the databuilder piece does not appear to be there.
Since it was a simple patch, I've remade the changes (with most of your commit message) and pushed it to the paule/django18 branch that hopefully we'll be moving over to soon.
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Quoted 11 lines · Paul Eggleton
Hi Aníbal,
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:21:36 Aníbal Limón wrote:
The new client/server API of tinfoil requires explicit call of shutdown method to send the event for finalize cooker process.
Also in
update_layerremove the databuilder and cache instance now isn't needed.This patch didn't apply against master - the databuilder piece does not appear to be there.
Great may be was my own changes against RRS,
Only a comment if your layerindex scripts don't call shutdown the update script seems blocked because never arrives the event.
Cheers,
alimon
Quoted 8 lines
Since it was a simple patch, I've remade the changes (with most of your commit message) and pushed it to the paule/django18 branch that hopefully we'll be moving over to soon.
Cheers,
Paul
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:42:46 Aníbal Limón wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Paul Eggleton
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:21:36 Aníbal Limón wrote:
The new client/server API of tinfoil requires explicit call of shutdown method to send the event for finalize cooker process.
Also in
update_layerremove the databuilder and cache instance now isn't needed.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
This patch didn't apply against master - the databuilder piece does not appear to be there.
Great may be was my own changes against RRS,
Only a comment if your layerindex scripts don't call shutdown the update script seems blocked because never arrives the event.
On the paule/django18 branch the update_layer.py script already calls shutdown(), and your patch takes care of the rest.
However this seems like a bug to me - if the client neglects to call shutdown() it would be nice if it didn't break things. Earlier I did use a destructor within the Tinfoil class to call shutdown() if it hadn't already been called, but I don't think that's reliable.
Cheers,
Paul
Signature · 2 lines
Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre