Patch "drm/nouveau/fifo/gf100-: protect channel preempt with subdev mutex" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/nouveau/fifo/gf100-: protect channel preempt with subdev mutex
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-nouveau-fifo-gf100-protect-channel-preempt-with-subdev-mutex.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
b27add13f500469127afdf011dbcc9c649e16e54Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Skeggs <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 14:33:14 +1000
Subject: drm/nouveau/fifo/gf100-: protect channel preempt with subdev mutex
From: Ben Skeggs <[email protected]>
commit b27add13f500469127afdf011dbcc9c649e16e54 upstream.
This avoids an issue that occurs when we're attempting to preempt multiple channels simultaneously. HW seems to ignore preempt requests while it's still processing a previous one, which, well, makes sense.
Fixes random "fifo: SCHED_ERROR 0d []" + GPCCS page faults during parallel piglit runs on (at least) GM107.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gpfifogf100.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gpfifogk104.c | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gpfifogf100.c +6 -3
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ gf100_fifo_gpfifo_engine_fini(struct nvkstruct nvkm_gpuobj *inst = chan->base.inst;int ret =0 ; +mutex_lock (&subdev->mutex);nvkm_wr32 (device,0x002634 , chan->base.chid); if (nvkm_msec(device, 2000, if (nvkm_rd32(device, 0x002634) == chan->base.chid)
@@ -67,10 +68,12 @@ gf100_fifo_gpfifo_engine_fini(struct nvk ) < 0) {nvkm_error (subdev,"channel %d [%s] kick timeout\n" , chan->base.chid, chan->base.object.client->name); - ret = -EBUSY ; -if (suspend) -return ret; + ret = -ETIMEDOUT ; } +mutex_unlock (&subdev->mutex); + +if (ret && suspend) +return ret;if (offset) {nvkm_kmap (inst);
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gpfifogk104.c +5 -3
@@ -40,7 +40,9 @@ gk104_fifo_gpfifo_kick(struct gk104_fifostruct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &fifo->base.engine.subdev;struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device;struct nvkm_client *client = chan->base.object.client; +int ret =0 ; +mutex_lock (&subdev->mutex);nvkm_wr32 (device,0x002634 , chan->base.chid); if (nvkm_msec(device, 2000, if (!(nvkm_rd32(device, 0x002634) & 0x00100000))
@@ -48,10 +50,10 @@ gk104_fifo_gpfifo_kick(struct gk104_fifo ) < 0) {nvkm_error (subdev,"channel %d [%s] kick timeout\n" , chan->base.chid, client->name); -return -EBUSY ; + ret = -ETIMEDOUT ; } - -return 0 ; +mutex_unlock (&subdev->mutex); +return ret; } static u32
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-ttm-wait-for-bo-fence-to-signal-before-unmapping-vmas.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-bios-require-checksum-to-match-for-fast-acpi-shadow-method.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-gr-fallback-to-legacy-paths-during-firmware-lookup.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-kms-lvds-panel-strap-moved-again-on-maxwell.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-ltc-protect-clearing-of-comptags-with-mutex.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-fifo-gf100-protect-channel-preempt-with-subdev-mutex.patch queue-4.8/drm-nouveau-i2c-gk110b-gm10x-use-the-correct-implementation.patch