Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline() callback" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jan 9, 2017

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline() callback

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
irqchip-bcm7038-l1-implement-irq_cpu_offline-callback.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 34c535793bcbf9263cf22f8a52101f796cdfab8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:17:35 -0700
Subject: irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline() callback

From: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>

commit 34c535793bcbf9263cf22f8a52101f796cdfab8e upstream.

We did not implement an irq_cpu_offline callback for our irqchip, yet we support setting a given IRQ's affinity. This resulted in interrupts whose affinity mask included CPUs being taken offline not to work correctly once the CPU had been put offline.

---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c +26 -0
@@ -216,6 +216,31 @@ static int bcm7038_l1_set_affinity(struc
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct cpumask *mask = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	cpumask_t new_affinity;
+
+	/* This CPU was not on the affinity mask */
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
+		return;
+
+	if (cpumask_weight(mask) > 1) {
+		/*
+		 * Multiple CPU affinity, remove this CPU from the affinity
+		 * mask
+		 */
+		cpumask_copy(&new_affinity, mask);
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &new_affinity);
+	} else {
+		/* Only CPU, put on the lowest online CPU */
+		cpumask_clear(&new_affinity);
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask), &new_affinity);
+	}
+	irq_set_affinity_locked(d, &new_affinity, false);
+}
+
 static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
 				      unsigned int idx,
 				      struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc)
@@ -267,6 +292,7 @@ static struct irq_chip bcm7038_l1_irq_ch
 	.irq_mask		= bcm7038_l1_mask,
 	.irq_unmask		= bcm7038_l1_unmask,
 	.irq_set_affinity	= bcm7038_l1_set_affinity,
+	.irq_cpu_offline	= bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline,
 };
 
 static int bcm7038_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/irqchip-bcm7038-l1-implement-irq_cpu_offline-callback.patch