Patch "arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-hugetlb-fix-the-wrong-address-for-several-functions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
0c2f0afe3582c58efeef93bc57bc07d502132618Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Huang Shijie <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:44:39 +0800
Subject: arm64: hugetlb: fix the wrong address for several functions
From: Huang Shijie <[email protected]>
commit 0c2f0afe3582c58efeef93bc57bc07d502132618 upstream.
The libhugetlbfs meets several failures since the following functions do not use the correct address:
huge_ptep_get_and_clear()
huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
huge_ptep_set_wrprotect()
huge_ptep_clear_flush()
This patch fixes the wrong address for them.
--- arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c +4 -4
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ pte_t huge_ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_ ncontig =find_num_contig (mm, addr, cpte, *cpte, &pgsize);/* save the 1st pte to return */ pte =ptep_get_and_clear (mm, addr, cpte); -for (i =1 ; i < ncontig; ++i) { +for (i =1 , addr += pgsize; i < ncontig; ++i, addr += pgsize) {/* * If HW_AFDBM is enabled, then the HW could * turn on the dirty bit for any of the page
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ int huge_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm pfn =pte_pfn (*cpte); ncontig =find_num_contig (vma->vm_mm, addr, cpte, *cpte, &pgsize); -for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte) { +for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte, addr += pgsize) { changed = ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, cpte, pfn_pte(pfn, hugeprot),
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ void huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_s cpte =huge_pte_offset (mm, addr); ncontig =find_num_contig (mm, addr, cpte, *cpte, &pgsize); -for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte) +for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte, addr += pgsize)ptep_set_wrprotect (mm, addr, cpte); }else {ptep_set_wrprotect (mm, addr, ptep);
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_are cpte =huge_pte_offset (vma->vm_mm, addr); ncontig =find_num_contig (vma->vm_mm, addr, cpte, *cpte, &pgsize); -for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte) +for (i =0 ; i < ncontig; ++i, ++cpte, addr += pgsize)ptep_clear_flush (vma, addr, cpte); }else {ptep_clear_flush (vma, addr, ptep);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.9/arm64-hugetlb-fix-the-wrong-address-for-several-functions.patch queue-4.9/arm64-hugetlb-remove-the-wrong-pmd-check-in-find_num_contig.patch queue-4.9/arm64-hugetlb-fix-the-wrong-return-value-for-huge_ptep_set_access_flags.patch