scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check
PATCH 1/1 scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check
Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> reported this:
---
The patch 9c46b8676271: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static checker warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1531 ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok()
warn: impossible condition
'(host->testbus.select_minor > 255) => (0-255 > 255)'drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
1517 static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host) 1518 {
1519 if (host->testbus.select_major >= TSTBUS_MAX) {
1520 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1521 "%s: UFS_CFG1[TEST_BUS_SEL} may not equal 0x%05X\n",
1522 __func__, host->testbus.select_major);
1523 return false;
1524 }
1525
1526 /*
1527 * Not performing check for each individual select_major
1528 * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
1529 * configuring a non-existent select_minor
1530 */
1531 if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^It might make sense to keep this check. I don't know. But it's confusing that 0xFF is a magic number. Better to make it a define.
1532 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1533 "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
1534 __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
1535 return false;
1536 }
1537
1538 return true;
1539 }
---
As data type of "select_minor" is u8, above check is redundant. This change removes it.
--- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +0 -12
@@ -1523,18 +1523,6 @@ static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)return false; } -/* -* Not performing check for each individual select_major -* mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in -* configuring a non-existent select_minor -*/ -if (host->testbus.select_minor >0xFF ) { -dev_err (host->hba->dev, -"%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n" , - __func__, host->testbus.select_minor); -return false; - } -return true; }
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Subhash" == Subhash Jadavani <[email protected]> writes:
Subhash,
Subhash> Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> reported this: --- The Subhash> patch 9c46b8676271: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus Subhash> registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static Subhash> checker warning:
You had used "---" to enclose Dan's email. But that's also the "ignore everything beyond this point" delimiter so I ended up with an empty commit message.
I fixed it up. Applied to 4.11/scsi-queue.
Signature · 1 line
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Quoted 9 lines · Martin K. Petersen
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Subhash" == Subhash Jadavani <[email protected]> writes:
Subhash,
Subhash> Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> reported this: --- The Subhash> patch
9c46b8676271: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus Subhash> registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static Subhash> checker warning:
Quoted 5 lines
You had used "---" to enclose Dan's email. But that's also the "ignore everything beyond this point" delimiter so I ended up with an empty commit message.
I fixed it up. Applied to 4.11/scsi-queue.
Thanks and sorry about that, was skeptical about it.
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project