FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: Clear HCR_TGE when invalidating guest TLBs" failed to apply to 4.10-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
68925176296a8b995e503349200e256674bfe5acMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:32:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: Clear HCR_TGE when invalidating guest TLBs
When invalidating guest TLBs, special care must be taken to actually shoot the guest TLBs and not the host ones if we're running on a VHE system. This is controlled by the HCR_EL2.TGE bit, which we forget to clear before invalidating TLBs.
Address the issue by introducing two wrappers (__tlb_switch_to_guest and __tlb_switch_to_host) that take care of both the VTTBR_EL2 and HCR_EL2.TGE switching.
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c +55 -9
@@ -18,14 +18,62 @@#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm) +{ +u64 val; + +/* +* With VHE enabled, we have HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} = {1,1}, and +* most TLB operations target EL2/EL0. In order to affect the +* guest TLBs (EL1/EL0), we need to change one of these two +* bits. Changing E2H is impossible (goodbye TTBR1_EL2), so +* let's flip TGE before executing the TLB operation. +*/ +write_sysreg (kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2); + val =read_sysreg (hcr_el2); + val &= ~HCR_TGE ; +write_sysreg (val, hcr_el2); +isb (); +} + +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm) +{ +write_sysreg (kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2); +isb (); +} + +static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_guest, + __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe, + __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe, + ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN); + +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm) +{ +/* +* We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's +* view of HCR_EL2. +*/ +write_sysreg (0 , vttbr_el2); +write_sysreg (HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS , hcr_el2); +} + +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm) +{ +write_sysreg (0 , vttbr_el2); +} + +static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_host, + __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe, + __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe, + ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN); + void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa) {dsb (ishst);/* Switch to requested VMID */ kvm =kern_hyp_va (kvm); -write_sysreg (kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2); -isb (); +__tlb_switch_to_guest ()(kvm);/* * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
@@ -46,7 +94,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)dsb (ish);isb (); -write_sysreg (0 , vttbr_el2); +__tlb_switch_to_host ()(kvm); } void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -55,14 +103,13 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)/* Switch to requested VMID */ kvm =kern_hyp_va (kvm); -write_sysreg (kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2); -isb (); +__tlb_switch_to_guest ()(kvm);__tlbi (vmalls12e1is);dsb (ish);isb (); -write_sysreg (0 , vttbr_el2); +__tlb_switch_to_host ()(kvm); } void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -70,14 +117,13 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)struct kvm *kvm =kern_hyp_va (kern_hyp_va (vcpu)->kvm);/* Switch to requested VMID */ -write_sysreg (kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2); -isb (); +__tlb_switch_to_guest ()(kvm);__tlbi (vmalle1);dsb (nsh);isb (); -write_sysreg (0 , vttbr_el2); +__tlb_switch_to_host ()(kvm); } void __hyp_text __kvm_flush_vm_context(void)